Literature DB >> 23815252

Intraoperative neuromonitoring with MEPs and prediction of postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing surgery for cervical and cervicothoracic myelopathy.

Aaron J Clark1, John E Ziewacz, Michael Safaee, Darryl Lau, Russ Lyon, Dean Chou, Philip R Weinstein, Christopher P Ames, John P Clark, Praveen V Mummaneni.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in surgical decompression surgery for myelopathy may assist the surgeon in taking corrective measures to reduce or prevent permanent neurological deficits. We evaluated the efficacy of IONM in cervical and cervicothoracic spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) cases.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 140 cases involving patients who underwent surgery for CSM utilizing IONM during 2011 at the University of California, San Francisco. Data on preoperative clinical variables, intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and postoperative new neurological deficits were collected. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed with the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Of the 140 patients, 16 (11%) had significant intraoperative decreases in MEPs. In 8 of these cases, the MEP signal did not return to baseline values by the end of the operation. There were 8 (6%) postoperative deficits, of which 6 were C-5 palsies and 2 were paraparesis. Six of the patients with postoperative deficits had demonstrated persistent MEP signal change on IONM. There was a significant association between persistent MEP changes and postoperative deficits (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of intraoperative MEP monitoring was 75%, the specificity 98%, the positive predictive value 75%, and the negative predictive value 98%. Due to higher rates of false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 60% in the subgroup of patients with vascular disease comorbidity. The sensitivity increased to 100% in elderly patients and in patients with preoperative motor deficits. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of deltoid and biceps MEP changes in predicting C-5 palsy were 67% and 67%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a correlation between decreased intraoperative MEPs and postoperative new neurological deficits in patients with CSM. Sensitivity varies based on patient comorbidities, age, and preoperative neurological function. Monitoring of MEPs is a useful adjunct for CSM cases, and the authors have developed a checklist to standardize their responses to intraoperative MEP changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23815252     DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS13121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  13 in total

Review 1.  The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; F Brigo; V N Frey; P Lochner; S Leis; S Golaszewski; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring outcomes between cervical and thoracic spine surgery.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Yuan Tian; Xiangquan Lin; Zhifu Ren; Yu Zhao; Jiliang Zhai; Xiaojuan Zhang; Yanwei Zhao; Yingyue Dong; Congran Zhao; Ye Tian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials in a spinal cord ischaemia rabbit model.

Authors:  Yucheng Lu; Baotao Lv; Qimin Song
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2019-12-05

4.  Comparative Sensitivity of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Neurologic Deficits: Nondegenerative versus Degenerative Myelopathy.

Authors:  Aaron J Clark; Michael Safaee; Dean Chou; Philip R Weinstein; Annette M Molinaro; John P Clark; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-10-25

5.  Changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials during the early and reversible stage of permanent spinal cord ischemia predict spinal cord injury in a rabbit animal model.

Authors:  Mingguang Wang; Fanguo Meng; Qimin Song; Jian Zhang; Chao Dai; Qingyan Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Iatrogenic Spinal Cord Injury Resulting From Cervical Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; Robert A Hart; Alan S Hilibrand; David E Fish; Jeffrey C Wang; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; P Justin Tortolani; D Alex Stroh; Ahmad Nassr; Bradford L Currier; Arjun S Sebastian; Paul M Arnold; Michael G Fehlings; Thomas E Mroz; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Corticobulbar motor evoked potentials from tongue muscles used as a control in cervical spinal surgery.

Authors:  Dong-Gun Kim; Seong-Rae Jo; Minjung Youn; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim; Kyung Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2017-06-07

8.  The prediction of intraoperative cervical cord function changes by different motor evoked potentials phenotypes in cervical myelopathy patients.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Zhifu Ren; Jia Liu; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jae Meen Lee; Dong Hwan Kim; Hwan Soo Kim; Byung Kwan Choi; In Ho Han
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-03-31

10.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring team's communiqué with anesthesia professionals.

Authors:  Anurag Tewari; Lisa Francis; Ravi N Samy; Dean C Kurth; Joshua Castle; Tiffany Frye; Mohamed Mahmoud
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.