Literature DB >> 23814138

Feasibility and safety of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass in major aortic surgery.

Aziz U Momin1, Mansour T A Sharabiani, Emadin Kidher, Ali Najefi, John W Mulholland, Barnaby C Reeves, Gianni D Angelini, Jon R Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Conventional cardiopulmonary bypass causes haemodilution and is a trigger of systemic inflammatory reactions, coagulopathy and organ failure. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass has been proposed as a way to reduce these deleterious effects of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and to promote a more physiological state. The use of miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass has been reported in low-risk patients undergoing valve and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. However, little is known about its application in major aortic surgery.
METHODS: From February 2007 to September 2010, 49 patients underwent major aortic surgery using the Hammersmith miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (ECCO, Sorin). Data were extracted from medical records to characterize preoperative comorbidities (EuroSCORE), perioperative complications and the use of blood products. The same data were collected and described for 328 consecutive patients having similar surgery with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass at the Bristol Heart Institute, our twinned centre, during the same period.
RESULTS: The miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass group had a median EuroSCORE of 8 [inter-quartile range (IQR): 5-11], 13% had preoperative renal dysfunction and 20% of operations were classified as emergency or salvage. Thirty-day mortalities were 6.4; and 69, 67 and 74% had ≥ 1 unit of red cells, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets transfused, respectively. Eight percent of patients experienced a renal complication, and 8% a neurological complication. The conventional cardiopulmonary bypass group was similar, with a EuroSCORE of 8 (IQR: 6-10); 30-day mortalities were 9.4; and 68, 62 and 74% had ≥ 1 unit of red cells, FFP and platelets transfused, respectively. The proportions experiencing renal and neurological complications were 14 and 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and feasible for use in major aortic cardiac surgery. A randomized trial is needed to evaluate miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass formally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary bypass; Heart surgery; Major aortic surgery; Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23814138      PMCID: PMC3781803          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  10 in total

1.  Minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castiglioni; Alessandro Verzini; Federico Pappalardo; Nicola Colangelo; Lucia Torracca; Alberto Zangrillo; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Aortic surgery using total miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Richard W Issitt; John W Mulholland; Martin D Oliver; Gemma J Yarham; Philippa J Borra; Paul Morrison; Ioannis Dimarakis; Jon R Anderson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Neurocognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery using minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a randomised controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Kyriakos Anastasiadis; Helena Argiriadou; Mary H Kosmidis; Kalliopi Megari; Polychronis Antonitsis; Evanthia Thomaidou; Eleni Aretouli; Christos Papakonstantinou
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass impact on blood conservation strategy in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel Aal; Nezar ElNahal; Bakir Moustafa Bakir; Mohamed Fouda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-01-20

5.  Clinical advantages of using mini-bypass systems in terms of blood product use, postoperative bleeding and air entrainment: an in vivo clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mathias Perthel; Lémir El-Ayoubi; Andreas Bendisch; Joachim Laas; Markus Gerigk
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  J P Remadi; Z Rakotoarivello; P Marticho; F Trojette; A Benamar; H Poulain; C Tribouilloy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circulation versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Andrea Colli; Claudio Fernandez; Luis Delgado; Bernardo Romero; Maria Luisa Camara; Xavier Ruyra
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-07-02

8.  Attenuated renal and intestinal injury after use of a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system.

Authors:  Rien A J M Huybregts; Aurora M Morariu; Gerhard Rakhorst; Stefan R Spiegelenberg; Hans W A Romijn; Roel de Vroege; Willem van Oeveren
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of miniaturised versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  F Biancari; R Rimpiläinen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Reduction in blood product usage associated with routine use of mini bypass systems in extracorporeal circulation.

Authors:  M Perthel; A Klingbeil; L El-Ayoubi; M Gerick; J Laas
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Metabolic derangement and cardiac injury early after reperfusion following intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery using conventional or miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Bao A V Nguyen; M-Saadeh Suleiman; Jonathan R Anderson; Paul C Evans; Francesca Fiorentino; Barnaby C Reeves; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.396

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.