Literature DB >> 17337198

Clinical advantages of using mini-bypass systems in terms of blood product use, postoperative bleeding and air entrainment: an in vivo clinical perspective.

Mathias Perthel1, Lémir El-Ayoubi, Andreas Bendisch, Joachim Laas, Markus Gerigk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to minimize the effect of extracorporeal circulation (ECC), mini-bypass is gaining clinical acceptance in routine coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). These small circuits target combine the clinical advantages of reduced prime, 100% bio-coating and suction blood separation. We demonstrate that the use of mini-bypass in routine CABG reduces homologous blood product use and postoperative bleeding. Our goal was to also demonstrate that these small systems are effective in gaseous microemboli (GME) management as compared to a conventional extracorporeal system.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized study comparing 30 mini-bypass (Dideco ECC.O) to 30 conventional systems (n=30, Dideco 903 Avant). Study included CABG cases only, independent of preoperative coagulative status; clinic ethical committee approval and informed patient consent was obtained before initiating study.
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in terms of patient demographics. Statistically significant differences were seen in transfusion frequency (27% of the study group vs 43% in the control group, p=0.05), transfused volume (133.3+/-244.5 ml vs 325+/-483.1 ml, p<0.05), fresh frozen plasma (0 unit vs 3 units, p<0.001), postoperative bleeding (301.8+/-531.9 ml vs 785.5+/-1000.4 ml, p<0.05) and GME activity post-arterial filter (0.14 microl vs 5.32 microl, p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of mini-bypass significantly potentially reduces hemodilution, donor blood usage, postoperative bleeding and exposure to GME in routine CABG patients as compared to the use of conventional extracorporeal circulation circuits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337198     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass in major aortic surgery.

Authors:  Aziz U Momin; Mansour T A Sharabiani; Emadin Kidher; Ali Najefi; John W Mulholland; Barnaby C Reeves; Gianni D Angelini; Jon R Anderson
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-28

2.  The effects of conventional extracorporeal circulation versus miniaturized extracorporeal circulation on microcirculation during cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Koray Yuruk; Rick Bezemer; Mariska Euser; Dan M J Milstein; Hilde H R de Geus; Evert W Scholten; Bas A J M de Mol; Can Ince
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-14

3.  A randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery performed with the Resting Heart™ System utilizing a low vs a standard dosage of heparin.

Authors:  Johan Nilsson; Sara Scicluna; Gunnar Malmkvist; Leif Pierre; Lars Algotsson; Per Paulsson; Henrik Bjursten; Per Johnsson
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-21

Review 4.  Mini cardiopulmonary bypass: Anesthetic considerations.

Authors:  Raed A Alsatli
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Jun

5.  Counteracting negative venous line pressures to avoid arterial air bubbles: an experimental study comparing two different types of miniaturized extracorporeal perfusion systems.

Authors:  Anas Aboud; Hendrikje Mederos-Dahms; Kai Liebing; Armin Zittermann; Harald Schubert; Edward Murray; Andre Renner; Jan Gummert; Jochen Börgermann
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.