Literature DB >> 23813785

A comparison of cancer survivors from the PROMIS study selecting telephone versus online questionnaires.

Megan Scull Williams1, Denise C Snyder, Richard Sloane, Justin Levens, Kathryn E Flynn, Carrie B Dombeck, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Kevin P Weinfurt.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; data collection; internet; oncology; surveys; telephone

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23813785      PMCID： PMC3808510          DOI： 10.1002/pon.3330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN： 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches.

Authors:  M Couper
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Comparison of telephone with World Wide Web-based responses by parents and teens to a follow-up survey after injury.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Jin Wang; Dennis Durbin; Kenneth M Jaffe; Monica Vavilala; Andrea Dorsch; Maria Roper-Caldbeck; Eileen Houseknecht; Nancy Temkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.

Authors:  Michael W Link; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

4.  Collecting data on alcohol use and alcohol-related victimization: a comparison of telephone and Web-based survey methods.

Authors:  Kathleen A Parks; Ann M Pardi; Clara M Bradizza
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-03

5.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Technology and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Eileen Danaher Hacker
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.315

7.  Eight self-administered 24-hour dietary recalls using the Internet are feasible in African Americans and Whites: the energetics study.

Authors:  Lenore Arab; Kate Wesseling-Perry; Patricia Jardack; Judith Henry; Ashley Winter
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-06

8.  Comparing the reliability of responses to telephone-administered versus self-administered Web-based surveys in a case-control study of adult malignant brain cancer.

Authors:  Kristin M Rankin; Garth H Rauscher; Bridget McCarthy; Serap Erdal; Pat Lada; Dora Il'yasova; Faith Davis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  High acceptance of an early dyslexia screening test involving genetic analyses in Germany.

Authors:  Arndt Wilcke; Bent Müller; Gesa Schaadt; Holger Kirsten; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Participation in questionnaire studies among couples affected by breast cancer.

Authors:  Helene Terp; Nina Rottmann; Pia Veldt Larsen; Mariët Hagedoorn; Henrik Flyger; Niels Kroman; Christoffer Johansen; Susanne Dalton; Dorte Gilså Hansen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Adapting MultiPLe behavior Interventions that eFfectively Improve (AMPLIFI) cancer survivor health: program project protocols for remote lifestyle intervention and assessment in 3 inter-related randomized controlled trials among survivors of obesity-related cancers.

Authors:  Dori Pekmezi; Kevin Fontaine; Laura Q Rogers; Maria Pisu; Michelle Y Martin; Yu-Mei Schoenberger-Godwin; Robert A Oster; Kelly Kenzik; Nataliya V Ivankova; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of PROMIS upper extremity after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dan Gordon; Yaniv Pines; Erel Ben-Ari; Rokito As; Young W Kwon; Joseph D Zuckerman; Mandeep S Virk
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Rationale and Methods for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Weight Loss Intervention among Cancer Survivors and Partners: The DUET Study.

Authors:  Dorothy W Pekmezi; Tracy E Crane; Robert A Oster; Laura Q Rogers; Teri Hoenemeyer; David Farrell; William W Cole; Kathleen Wolin; Hoda Badr; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  Correction: Pekmezi et al. Rationale and Methods for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic, Web-Based, Weight Loss Intervention among Cancer Survivors and Partners: The DUET Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3472.

Authors:  Dorothy W Pekmezi; Tracy E Crane; Robert A Oster; Laura Q Rogers; Teri Hoenemeyer; David Farrell; William W Cole; Kathleen Wolin; Hoda Badr; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.706
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.