Literature DB >> 23813210

Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance.

Michael W Smith1, Traber Davis Giardina, Daniel R Murphy, Archana Laxmisan, Hardeep Singh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Systemic issues can adversely affect the diagnostic process. Many system-related barriers can be masked by 'resilient' actions of frontline providers (ie, actions supporting the safe delivery of care in the presence of pressures that the system cannot readily adapt to). We explored system barriers and resilient actions of primary care providers (PCPs) in the diagnostic evaluation of cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of interviews of PCPs involved in diagnostic evaluation of 29 lung and colorectal cancer cases. Cases covered a range of diagnostic timeliness and were analysed to identify barriers for rapid diagnostic evaluation, and PCPs' actions involving elements of resilience addressing those barriers. We rated these actions according to whether they were usual or extraordinary for typical PCP work.
RESULTS: Resilient actions and associated barriers were found in 59% of the cases, in all ranges of timeliness, with 40% involving actions rated as beyond typical. Most of the barriers were related to access to specialty services and coordination with patients. Many of the resilient actions involved using additional communication channels to solicit cooperation from other participants in the diagnostic process. DISCUSSION: Diagnostic evaluation of cancer involves several resilient actions by PCPs targeted at system deficiencies. PCPs' actions can sometimes mitigate system barriers to diagnosis, and thereby impact the sensitivity of 'downstream' measures (eg, delays) in detecting barriers. While resilient actions might enable providers to mitigate system deficiencies in the short run, they can be resource intensive and potentially unsustainable. They complement, rather than substitute for, structural remedies to improve system performance. Measures to detect and fix system performance issues targeted by these resilient actions could facilitate diagnostic safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic errors; Medical error, measurement/epidemiology; Patient safety; Primary care; Quality measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813210      PMCID: PMC3833904          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  33 in total

1.  Human error: models and management.

Authors:  J Reason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Adverse events in health care: issues in measurement.

Authors:  K Walshe
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

3.  Institutional resilience in healthcare systems.

Authors:  J Carthey; M R de Leval; J T Reason
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

4.  The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality.

Authors:  H R Rubin; P Pronovost; G B Diette
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Dissatisfaction with medical practice.

Authors:  Abigail Zuger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Measuring errors and adverse events in health care.

Authors:  Eric J Thomas; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.

Authors:  M Maclure; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards.

Authors:  J B Battles; R J Lilford
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

10.  The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction.

Authors:  Alissa L Russ; Rollin J Fairbanks; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Laura G Militello; Jason J Saleem; Robert L Wears
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cancer care coordination: opportunities for healthcare delivery research.

Authors:  Sallie J Weaver; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Resilient Practices in Maintaining Safety of Health Information Technologies.

Authors:  Michael W Smith; Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Cogn Eng Decis Mak       Date:  2014-09

3.  Variation in electronic test results management and its implications for patient safety: A multisite investigation.

Authors:  Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Julie Li; Peter Smith; Jacqui Irvine; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.