Literature DB >> 21717987

Surgical outcome following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular joint disruption with the tightrope device.

Eric Thiel1, Amar Mutnal, Gregory J Gilot.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary radiographic and clinical results of grade IV and V acromioclavicular joint disruption repair using the arthroscopic Arthrex acromioclavicular TightRope (Naples, Florida) fixation technique. Numerous procedures have been described for surgical management of acromioclavicular joint disruption. The TightRope device involves an arthroscopic technique that allows nonrigid anatomic fixation of the acromioclavicular joint. A cohort of 10 men and 2 women with a mean age of 43 years (range, 25-61 years) underwent the acromioclavicular joint TightRope procedure between April 2007 and October 2009. Eleven patients had either Rockwood grade IV or V disruptions and 1 sustained a distal third clavicle fracture with acromioclavicular joint disruption. Data was collected from a chart review. Patients were evaluated clinically, radiographically, by the simple shoulder test, and by overall satisfaction. There were 2 failures of reduction and 1 loss of reduction at final radiographic follow-up. The rate of fixation failure was 16.6%. All patients had >110° of total elevation. The majority of patients obtained satisfactory functional results according to the Simple Shoulder Test averaging 11 of 12 questions answered positively (range, 7-12; standard deviation, 1.50) and 11 of 12 patients were satisfied with the procedure. At final phone interview at approximately 2 years postoperatively, 6 patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining patients were all satisfied with the procedure and no patients reported subjective loss of reduction or deterioration of function. Simple Shoulder Test average was maintained with 11 of 12 positively answered questions (range, 7-12; standard deviation, 2.0) This case series revealed a high rate of fixation failure with the TightRope system. Still, most patients were satisfied with the procedure and achieved high functional shoulder results. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717987     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20110526-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  22 in total

1.  Arthroscopic-Assisted Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using the TightRope Device With Allograft Augmentation: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Scott W Trenhaile
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-07-06

2.  Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Steffen B Roßlenbroich; Kristian N Schneider; Christina Theisen; Wolf Petersen; Michael J Raschke; André Weimann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Ryan J Warth; Frank Martetschläger; Trevor R Gaskill; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

4.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Ashish Babhulkar; Aditya Pawaskar
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

5.  Results of Arthroscopy-Assisted TightRope Repair of Acromioclavicular Dislocations.

Authors:  Tapio E Flinkkilä; Essi Ihanainen
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2013-08-23

Review 6.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries and reconstructions: a review of expected imaging findings and potential complications.

Authors:  Andrew C Kim; George Matcuk; Dakshesh Patel; John Itamura; Deborah Forrester; Eric White; Christopher J Gottsegen
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-05-26

7.  Evaluation of coracoclavicular stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with multistrand titanium cables.

Authors:  Tianwen Ye; Yueping Ouyang; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-11

8.  Outcomes of acromioclavicular joint dislocation using tightrope arthroscopy.

Authors:  Arsalan Mahmoodian; Pedram Yavari; Pouya Moshkdar; Saeed Karimimatloub; Sepehr Eslami; Mina Shakery Boroujeni; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Nan Lu; Lei Zhu; Tianwen Ye; Aimin Chen; Xi Jiang; Zhiling Zhang; Qinghua Zhu; Qinghe Guo; Di Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.