Literature DB >> 23811412

Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems.

Katy A Cross1, Salvatore Torrisi, Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin, Marco Iacoboni.   

Abstract

Humans have an automatic tendency to imitate others. Although several regions commonly observed in social tasks have been shown to be involved in imitation control, there is little work exploring how these regions interact with one another. We used fMRI and dynamic causal modeling to identify imitation-specific control mechanisms and examine functional interactions between regions. Participants performed a pre-specified action (lifting their index or middle finger) in response to videos depicting the same two actions (biological cues) or dots moving with similar trajectories (non-biological cues). On congruent trials, the stimulus and response were similar (e.g. index finger response to index finger or left side dot stimulus), while on incongruent trials the stimulus and response were dissimilar (e.g. index finger response to middle finger or right side dot stimulus). Reaction times were slower on incongruent compared to congruent trials for both biological and non-biological stimuli, replicating previous findings that suggest the automatic imitative or spatially compatible (congruent) response must be controlled on incongruent trials. Neural correlates of the congruency effects were different depending on the cue type. The medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis (IFGpo) and the left anterior insula were involved specifically in controlling imitation. In addition, the IFGpo was also more active for biological compared to non-biological stimuli, suggesting that the region represents the frontal node of the human mirror neuron system (MNS). Effective connectivity analysis exploring the interactions between these regions, suggests a role for the mPFC and ACC in imitative conflict detection and the anterior insula in conflict resolution processes, which may occur through interactions with the frontal node of the MNS. We suggest an extension of the previous models of imitation control involving interactions between imitation-specific and general cognitive control mechanisms.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic imitation; Cognitive control; Dynamic causal modeling; Mirror neuron system; Spatial compatibility; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811412      PMCID: PMC4004608          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  95 in total

1.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement.

Authors:  Paola Borroni; Marcella Montagna; Gabriella Cerri; Fausto Baldissera
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.

Authors:  Bennett I Bertenthal; Matthew R Longo; Adam Kosobud
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A critique of functional localisers.

Authors:  K J Friston; P Rotshtein; J J Geng; P Sterzer; R N Henson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Dynamic causal modeling: a generative model of slice timing in fMRI.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Stefan Klöppel; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Margaret Delano; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala.

Authors:  Amit Etkin; Tobias Egner; Daniel M Peraza; Eric R Kandel; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times.

Authors:  Michael D Aicken; Andrew D Wilson; Justin H G Williams; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition.

Authors:  David M Amodio; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; Tor D Wager; John Jonides
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  27 in total

1.  Sex differences in somatomotor representations of others' pain: a permutation-based analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Christov-Moore; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study.

Authors:  B Rauchbauer; C Lorenz; C Lamm; D M Pfabigan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self-other distinction.

Authors:  Daniel Joel Shaw; Kristína Czekóová; Michaela Porubanová
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Neural systems for preparatory control of imitation.

Authors:  Katy A Cross; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Brain and psychological mediators of imitation: sociocultural versus physical traits.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin; Choong-Wan Woo; Anjali Krishnan; Tor D Wager; Marco Iacoboni; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2015-03-25

6.  Increasing generosity by disrupting prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Leonardo Christov-Moore; Taisei Sugiyama; Kristina Grigaityte; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance.

Authors:  Katy A Cross; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Imitation or Polarity Correspondence? Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence for the Confounding Influence of Orthogonal Spatial Compatibility on Measures of Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Kristína Czekóová; Daniel Joel Shaw; Martin Lamoš; Beáta Špiláková; Miguel Salazar; Milan Brázdil
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Observation and imitation of actions performed by humans, androids, and robots: an EMG study.

Authors:  Galit Hofree; Burcu A Urgen; Piotr Winkielman; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Complementary actions.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Sonia Betti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.