Literature DB >> 23811231

A new approach for diagnosis of bovine coronavirus using a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay.

H M Amer1, A Abd El Wahed, M A Shalaby, F N Almajhdi, F T Hufert, M Weidmann.   

Abstract

Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) is an economically significant cause of calf scours and winter dysentery of adult cattle, and may induce respiratory tract infections in cattle of all ages. Early diagnosis of BCoV helps to diminish its burden on the dairy and beef industry. Real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of BCoV has been described, but it is relatively expensive, requires well-equipped laboratories and is not suitable for on-site screening. A novel assay, using reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA), for the detection of BCoV is developed. The BCoV RT-RPA was rapid (10-20 min) and has an analytical sensitivity of 19 molecules. No cross-reactivity with other viruses causing bovine gastrointestinal and/or respiratory infections was observed. The assay performance on clinical samples was validated by testing 16 fecal and 14 nasal swab specimens and compared to real-time RT-PCR. Both assays provided comparable results. The RT-RPA assay was significantly more rapid than the real-time RT-PCR assay. The BCoV RT-RPA constitutes a suitable accurate, sensitive and rapid alternative to the common measures used for BCoV diagnosis. In addition, the use of a portable fluorescence reading device extends its application potential to use in the field and point-of-care diagnosis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCoV; Bovine coronavirus; LAMP; MEM; Molecular diagnostic techniques; PCR; Point-of-care systems; RPA; RT; bovine coronavirus; loop-mediated isothermal amplification; minimal essential medium; polymerase chain reaction; recombinase polymerase amplification; reverse transcriptase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811231      PMCID: PMC7113639          DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


Introduction

Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) is an important pathogen of livestock causing enteric disease in newly born calves (neonatal calf diarrhea), and adult cattle (winter dysentery) (Clark, 1993). The virus is also implicated in respiratory tract infections of growing calves and shipping fever pneumonia in feedlot cattle (Saif, 2010, Storz et al., 2000). Some BCoV virus strains may also be responsible for simultaneous enteric and respiratory tract infections (Decaro et al., 2008a). Although BCoV infections have a high morbidity that may reach 100%, it rarely causes death. However, the economic losses are substantial in dairy and beef farms due to sudden and dramatic reduction in milk production and loss of body weight (Svensson et al., 2003, Traven et al., 2001). The current measures used for BCoV diagnosis consist mostly of the detection of viral RNA by conventional and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011, Decaro et al., 2008b, Takiuchi et al., 2006). Samples collected from animals in the field are sent to the laboratory for testing as mobile real-time PCR is rarely available, complex technically and expensive. Therefore, a portable, simple, rapid nucleic acid detection test, and accurate as PCR is needed to detect the virus at the site where infections occur. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is an isothermal DNA amplification and detection technology (Piepenburg et al., 2006). In contrast to PCR, amplification depends on a specific combination of enzymes and proteins (recombinase, single strand binding protein, and strand displacing DNA polymerase) used at a constant temperature (Euler et al., 2012a, Euler et al., 2012b). Real-time detection of the amplification process is contingent on RPA exo probes and the fluorescence signal is measured in real-time via a simple point-of-care scanner weighing only 1.2 kg including a laptop computer (ESEQuant Tubescanner device, QiagenLake Constance GmbH, Stockach, Germany). In this report, the development of a real-time RT-RPA assay for rapid, simple and portable detection of BCoV in field samples was described.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and virus strains

BCoV, Mebus strain (provided by Ohio State University, USA), was grown for 3 days on MDBK cells, and maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with a mixture of penicillin and streptomycin (1%) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Other viruses utilized in the study to ascertain the specificity of the assay included bovine rotaviruses (UK strain from Montreal University, Canada, NCDC strain from Ohio State University, USA), bovine viral diarrhea virus (Osolss strain from South Dakota State University, USA), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (Cooper strain, from Cairo University, Egypt), bovine parainfluenza type 3 virus (SF strain from Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Egypt) and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (Egyptian strain from Central Laboratories for Control of Veterinary Biologics, Egypt).

Clinical samples and RNA preparation

Thirty bovine samples, 16 fecal swabs and 14 nasal swabs, were collected from suspected cases of gastrointestinal and/or respiratory tract infections form farms around Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. BCoV free swabs were obtained from non-infected calves, and tested by real-time RT-PCR, to serve as negative controls. Swabs were placed immediately after collection in 2 ml MEM containing 1000 U penicillin, and 1 mg streptomycin. After transportation on dry ice, samples were mixed by pulse-vortexing for 15 s, and swabs were discarded. Sample suspensions were diluted 1:10 in MEM and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The clarified supernatants were transferred to sterile vials, and aliquots of 140 μl were separated for RNA extraction using QIAamp viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer instructions.

Generation of RNA standard

The isolated RNA of BCoV was reverse transcribed and amplified using the QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). The forward primer: 5′-TGGATCAAGATT AGAGTTGGC-3′, and the reverse primer: 5′-CCTTGTCCATTCTTCTGACC-3′ were used to amplify 236 nt of the nucleocapsid (N) gene of BCoV (30371–30607 of Genbank accession number U00735) (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011). The RT-PCR reaction was set as follows: RT step at 50 °C for 30 min, initial activation at 95 °C for 15 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 60 s, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified fragment was ligated into pCR®II using TA-cloning kit dual promoter with One shot® chemically competent Escherichia coli (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany). The ligated fragment was confirmed by sequencing (Seqlab, Goettingen, Germany), and RNA was transcribed and quantified using the RiboGreen reagent kit (Invitrogen) as previously described (Weidmann et al., 2003). The standard was tested by a published real-time RT-PCR protocol (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011) using Light Cycler 2.0 and the LightCycler RNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche, Manheim, Germany). The assay performance showed the same sensitivities (103) as reported in the original publication and the specificity of the real-time RT-PCR was confirmed depending on the melting curve (T : 78 ± 0.5) (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011).

Real-time RT-RPA amplicon design

The RT-RPA forward primer 5′-GCTATAATGGTGCAATTAGATTTGACAGT-3′, and reverse primer 5′-GCTGACGCTGTGGTTTTGGACTCATATTC-3′ for the detection of BCoV N gene were designed using the following available GenBank sequences (EF193073–EF193074). The RT-RPA amplicon was placed between nt 30451 and 30585 of the GenBank accession number U00735 (length 135 nt). The RPA exo probe was synthesized by TIB MOLBIOL (Berlin, Germany) as following 5′-GGACTCATATTCATCATACCATCTTGTTGT (BHQ1-dT) (THF) (FAM-dT) ATGC ATTCAAATTCTC-Phosphate.

RT-RPA reaction condition

The BCoV RT-RPA was performed in a 50 μl volume using TwistAmp™ exo lyophilized kit (TwistDx, Cambridge, UK). 420 nM RT-RPA primers, 120 nM RT-RPA exo probe, 2 U Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), 20 U RiboLock RNase inhibitor (Fisher, Schwerte, Germany), 2 μM DTT (Roche), 14 mM Mg acetate, 4× TwistAmp™ rehydration buffer (TwistDx), and 1 μl RNA template were added to the RPA strips containing a dried enzyme pellet. Fluorescence measurements in the FAM channel (Excitation 470 nm, Detection 520 nm) were performed in an ESEQuant tubescanner (Qiagen) at 42 °C for 20 min 8 (Euler et al., 2012a). A combined threshold and signal slope analysis offered by the tubescanner software, was used for signal interpretation that can be confirmed by 2nd derivative analysis.

Determination of sensitivity and specificity

A dilution range from 107 to 101 molecules/μl of the BCoV RNA standard was prepared as described previously (Weidmann et al., 2008). The BCoV RT-RPA was tested using the quantitative RNA standard in 8 replicates, the threshold time was plotted against molecules detected and a semi-log regression was calculated. For exact determination, a probit regression was performed using the Statistica software (StatSoft, Hamburg, Germany). To determine the relationship between real-time RT-PCR CT value and RT-RPA threshold time, a linear regression analysis using Prism software (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, California) was performed. The target sequence of GenBank accession number EU401981 was synthesized (Life Technologies/GeneArt AG, Regensburg, Germany) to check a sequence mismatch at position 11 of the upstream primer, which occurs in sequences GenBank accession number FJ938063, EU401980-82, and DQ811784. The assay specificity was evaluated against a panel of viruses considered for differential diagnosis with BCoV. The final assay performance was validated by testing RNA extracts of bovine clinical samples as compared to real-time RT-PCR results.

Results

BCoV RT-RPA sensitivity and specificity

Using a dilution range of 107 to 101  molecules/μl of the BCoV RNA standard, the sensitivity of real-time RT-PCR was confirmed at 103 molecules detected (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011), while the sensitivity of RT-RPA assay was 102 to 101 molecules (Fig. 1 A and B). A probit regression analysis using the results of 8 complete molecular standard runs calculated that in 95% of cases, BCoV RT-RPA could be detected down to 19 RNA molecules (Fig. 1C). A synthesized sequence carrying the mismatch in the upstream primer was also detected and had no influence on the performance of the assay. In recent study, up to nine mismatches within RPA primers and probe did not affect the HIV-1 RPA assay performance (Boyle et al., 2013).
Fig. 1

Performance of the real-time BCoV RT-RPA. (A) Fluorescence development over time using a dilution range of 107 to 101 molecules/μl of the BCoV RNA standard (Graph generated by ESEquant tubescanner software). (B) Semi-logarithmic regression of the data collected from 8 BCoV RT-RPA test runs on the RNA standard using Prism Software version 4.0. (C) Probit regression analysis using Statistica software on data of the 8 runs. The limit of detection at 95% probability (19 molecules) is depicted by a rhomboid.

Performance of the real-time BCoV RT-RPA. (A) Fluorescence development over time using a dilution range of 107 to 101 molecules/μl of the BCoV RNA standard (Graph generated by ESEquant tubescanner software). (B) Semi-logarithmic regression of the data collected from 8 BCoV RT-RPA test runs on the RNA standard using Prism Software version 4.0. (C) Probit regression analysis using Statistica software on data of the 8 runs. The limit of detection at 95% probability (19 molecules) is depicted by a rhomboid. The specificity of BCoV RT-RPA assay was determined by cross detection of other viruses causing bovine gastrointestinal and/or respiratory infections such as bovine rotaviruses, bovine viral diarrhea virus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, bovine parainfluenza type 3 virus, and bovine respiratory syncytial virus. No cross detections were observed.

Validation of assay performance on clinical samples

Sixteen fecal and 14 nasal swab specimens were collected from cattle showing intestinal and/or respiratory manifestations. The total RNA extracts of these samples were tested with real-time RT-PCR and RT-RPA. Both assays showed the same performance (19 positive and 11 negative cases). The cycle threshold and threshold time values of RT-PCR and RT-RPA respectively well at an R 2 value of 0.8 (Fig. 2 ).
Fig. 2

Comparison between performances of RT-RPA and real-time RT-PCR on clinical samples. Thirty RNA extracts of samples collected from suspected cases of BCoV were screened. Linear regression analysis of RT-RPA threshold time (y axis) and RT-PCR cycle threshold (CT) values (x axis) were determined by Prism software. R2 value was 0.8.

Comparison between performances of RT-RPA and real-time RT-PCR on clinical samples. Thirty RNA extracts of samples collected from suspected cases of BCoV were screened. Linear regression analysis of RT-RPA threshold time (y axis) and RT-PCR cycle threshold (CT) values (x axis) were determined by Prism software. R2 value was 0.8.

Discussion

Diagnosis of BCoV as a potential cause of gastroenteritis and respiratory tract infections in cattle is hampered by the implication of a long list of pathogens in these disease syndromes (Snodgrass et al., 1986). The diagnostic difficulty of BCoV is exaggerated by its fastidious growth in cell culture and the relative inaccuracy of most utilized serological assays (Clark, 1993). Molecular approaches including conventional gel-based, nested/semi-nested, and real-time RT-PCR have proved extremely expedient for BCoV detection (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011, Decaro et al., 2008b, Fukuda et al., 2012, Park et al., 2007, Takiuchi et al., 2006, Zhu et al., 2011). However, they require expensive high-precision instruments, considerable expertise, complex optimized experimental setup and specific well-equipped laboratories. Therefore, these assays are not suitable for field use and point-of-care applications. Since the early 1990s, isothermal DNA amplification methods have been developed as a simple, rapid and cost-effective alternative to PCR-based amplification. As they maintain the higher sensitivity and specificity of real-time PCR, the use of isothermal amplification approaches in on-site screening could improve the diagnostic procedures for acute infections. Established isothermal amplification methods include transcription mediated amplification, nucleic acid sequence based amplification, strand displacement methods as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), rolling circle amplification methods, helicase dependent amplification, hybridization chain reaction and RPA (Chang et al., 2012, Gill and Ghaemi, 2008, Kim and Easley, 2011). These methods differ in terms of complexity (number of enzymes, primers and/or probes), sensitivity, specificity, speed, contamination risk, portability, and commercial availability. Compared to other isothermal amplification techniques, RPA requires no initial heating for DNA denaturation and the target is amplified exponentially at a constant low temperature (37–42 °C). Together with the availability of assay reagents in a dry pellet form and the use of a battery-charged portable instrument (ESEQuant tubescanner), RPA may be the most applicable approach for field diagnosis of infectious diseases. In a previous report, a real-time RT-PCR system for detection and quantitation of BCoV using SYBR Green I and melting curve analysis was established (Amer and Almajhdi, 2011). It was designed to target the nucleocapsid (N) gene, which is highly conserved among BCoV strains and of which the subgenomic RNA is the most abundant in coronavirus-infected cells (Spaan et al., 1988). The assay showed a distinct specificity, reproducibility and an analytical sensitivity of 103 copies of the DNA plasmid standard. In this study, an RT-RPA assay for the detection of BCoV was developed targeting the same gene. RNA standard was generated for better evaluation of the assay performance. While real-time RT-PCR assay maintained the same analytical sensitivity (103 copies) using the RNA standard, RT-RPA achieved an improved analytical sensitivity (Fig. 1A and B) of 19 molecules detected as determined by probit regression analysis (Fig. 1C). The assay was shown to be reproducible throughout 8 test runs and linear over a range of 7 orders of magnitude, from 101 to 107 RNA copies (Fig. 1A). The diagnostic applicability of the developed RT-RPA assay under field conditions was further validated by testing 30 bovine clinical samples as compared to real-time RT-PCR. The results of both assays were similar for all samples and the values of threshold time (in RT-RPA) and threshold cycles (in real-time RT-PCR) were highly compatible expect for only one sample (Fig. 2). Recently, an RT-LAMP assay was developed for the detection of BCoV in fecal specimens (Qiao et al., 2012). Although this assay is highly specific and sensitive, it seems to lack several advantages in comparison to the developed RT-RPA assay: (i) ease and flexibility of oligonucleotide design; only two primers and a single probe are required for RT-RPA, while three primer pairs are utilized in LAMP, (ii) significant assay run time advantage; 10–20 min for RT-RPA and 60–90 min for LAMP, (iii) better mobility due to smaller and lighter detection device (iv) additionally the RT-RPA was also evaluated with nasal samples. In conclusion, a novel RT-RPA assay was developed for rapid and sensitive identification of BCoV in bovine fecal and nasal samples. The applicability of this assay for onsite screening can provide an invaluable tool for prompt diagnosis of disease syndromes caused by BCoV and implementation of the proper strategic and control measures. In addition, the availability of a sensitive, specific and simple diagnostic technique like BCoV RT-RPA will aid in epidemiological surveillance of BCoV and identification of chronic shedders in beef and dairy farms.
  24 in total

1.  Recombinase polymerase amplification assay for rapid detection of Francisella tularensis.

Authors:  Milena Euler; Yongjie Wang; Peter Otto; Herbert Tomaso; Raquel Escudero; Pedro Anda; Frank T Hufert; Manfred Weidmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Coronaviruses: structure and genome expression.

Authors:  W Spaan; D Cavanagh; M C Horzinek
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.891

3.  Coronavirus and Pasteurella infections in bovine shipping fever pneumonia and Evans' criteria for causation.

Authors:  J Storz; X Lin; C W Purdy; V N Chouljenko; K G Kousoulas; F M Enright; W C Gilmore; R E Briggs; R W Loan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid and sensitive detection of bovine coronavirus and group a bovine rotavirus from fecal samples by using one-step duplex RT-PCR assay.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Jianbao Dong; Takeshi Haga; Yoshitaka Goto; Masuo Sueyoshi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Detection and molecular characterization of calf diarrhoea bovine coronaviruses circulating in South Korea during 2004-2005.

Authors:  S J Park; G K Lim; S I Park; H H Kim; H B Koh; K O Cho
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.702

6.  Rapid detection of important human pathogenic Phleboviruses.

Authors:  Manfred Weidmann; M Paz Sanchez-Seco; Amadou A Sall; Peinda Ogo Ly; Yaya Thiongane; Modou M Lô; Heike Schley; Frank T Hufert
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Rapid detection of HIV-1 proviral DNA for early infant diagnosis using recombinase polymerase amplification.

Authors:  David S Boyle; Dara A Lehman; Lorraine Lillis; Dylan Peterson; Mitra Singhal; Niall Armes; Mathew Parker; Olaf Piepenburg; Julie Overbaugh
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  Development of a SYBR Green I based real-time RT-PCR assay for detection and quantification of bovine coronavirus.

Authors:  Haitham M Amer; Fahad N Almajhdi
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Experimental reproduction of winter dysentery in lactating cows using BCV -- comparison with BCV infection in milk-fed calves.

Authors:  M Tråvén; K Näslund; N Linde; B Linde; A Silván; C Fossum; K O Hedlund; B Larsson
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Improved detection of bovine coronavirus N gene in faeces of calves infected naturally by a semi-nested PCR assay and an internal control.

Authors:  Elisabete Takiuchi; Danilo T Stipp; Alice F Alfieri; Amauri A Alfieri
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 2.014

View more
  50 in total

1.  Early detection of dengue virus by use of reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification.

Authors:  Boon-Teong Teoh; Sing-Sin Sam; Kim-Kee Tan; Mohammed Bashar Danlami; Meng-Hooi Shu; Jefree Johari; Poh-Sim Hooi; David Brooks; Olaf Piepenburg; Oliver Nentwich; Annelies Wilder-Smith; Leticia Franco; Antonio Tenorio; Sazaly AbuBakar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Development of a Sensitive and Rapid Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum.

Authors:  Le Jiang; Philip Ching; Chien-Chung Chao; J Stephen Dumler; Wei-Mei Ching
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multiplex isothermal solid-phase recombinase polymerase amplification for the specific and fast DNA-based detection of three bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Sebastian Kersting; Valentina Rausch; Frank F Bier; Markus von Nickisch-Rosenegk
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  Rapid Detection of Cyprinid Herpesvirus 3 in Latently Infected Koi by Recombinase Polymerase Amplification.

Authors:  Meagan A Prescott; Aimee N Reed; Ling Jin; Manoj K Pastey
Journal:  J Aquat Anim Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.625

5.  Diagnosis of COVID-19, vitality of emerging technologies and preventive measures.

Authors:  Muhammad Asif; Yun Xu; Fei Xiao; Yimin Sun
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 13.273

Review 6.  Biological characteristics and biomarkers of novel SARS-CoV-2 facilitated rapid development and implementation of diagnostic tools and surveillance measures.

Authors:  Gajanan Sampatrao Ghodake; Surendra Krushna Shinde; Avinash Ashok Kadam; Rijuta Ganesh Saratale; Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale; Asad Syed; Abdallah M Elgorban; Najat Marraiki; Dae-Young Kim
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Rapid Diagnostics of Dengue Infection.

Authors:  Ahmed Abd El Wahed; Pranav Patel; Oumar Faye; Sasikanya Thaloengsok; Doris Heidenreich; Ponpan Matangkasombut; Khajohnpong Manopwisedjaroen; Anavaj Sakuntabhai; Amadou A Sall; Frank T Hufert; Manfred Weidmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assays for Detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi or Rickettsia typhi.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chao; Tatyana Belinskaya; Zhiwen Zhang; Wei-Mei Ching
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-07-10

9.  Isolation and Characterization of Dromedary Camel Coronavirus UAE-HKU23 from Dromedaries of the Middle East: Minimal Serological Cross-Reactivity between MERS Coronavirus and Dromedary Camel Coronavirus UAE-HKU23.

Authors:  Patrick C Y Woo; Susanna K P Lau; Rachel Y Y Fan; Candy C Y Lau; Emily Y M Wong; Sunitha Joseph; Alan K L Tsang; Renate Wernery; Cyril C Y Yip; Chi-Ching Tsang; Ulrich Wernery; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Evaluation of recombinase polymerase amplification for detection of begomoviruses by plant diagnostic clinics.

Authors:  Maria A Londoño; Carrie L Harmon; Jane E Polston
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.