Literature DB >> 23807776

HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity.

Wedad M Hanna1, Josef Rüschoff2, Michael Bilous3, Renata A Coudry4, Mitch Dowsett5, Robert Y Osamura6, Frédérique Penault-Llorca7, Marc van de Vijver8, Giuseppe Viale9.   

Abstract

Trastuzumab-containing therapy is a standard of care for patients with HER2+ breast cancer. HER2 status is routinely assigned using in situ hybridization to assess HER2 gene amplification, but interpretation of in situ hybridization results may be challenging in tumors with chromosome 17 polysomy or intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Apparent chromosome 17 polysomy, defined by increased chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) signal number, is a common genetic aberration in breast cancer and represents an alternative mechanism for increasing HER2 copy number. Some studies have linked elevated CEP17 count ('polysomy') with adverse clinicopathologic features and HER2 overexpression, although there are numerous discrepancies in the literature. There is evidence that elevated CEP17 ('polysomy') count might account for trastuzumab response in tumors with normal HER2:CEP17 ratios. Nonetheless, recent studies establish that apparent 'polysomy' (CEP17 increase) is usually related to focal pericentromeric gains rather than true polysomy. Assigning HER2 status may also be complex where multiple cell subclones with distinct HER2 amplification characteristics coexist within the same tumor. Such genetic heterogeneity affects up to 40% of breast cancers when assessed according to a College of American Pathologists guideline, although other definitions have been proposed. Recent data have associated heterogeneity with unfavorable clinicopathologic variables and poor prognosis. Genetically heterogeneous tumors harboring HER2-amplified subclones have the potential to benefit from trastuzumab, but this has yet to be evaluated in clinical studies. In this review, we discuss the implications of apparent polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity for assigning HER2 status in clinical practice. Among our recommendations, we support the use of mean HER2 copy number rather than HER2:CEP17 ratio to define HER2 positivity in cases where coamplification of the centromere might mask HER2 amplification. We also highlight a need to harmonize in situ hybridization scoring methodology to support accurate HER2 status determination, particularly where there is evidence of heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807776     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  76 in total

1.  Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations.

Authors:  S Bianchi; S Caini; M Paglierani; C Saieva; V Vezzosi; G Baroni; A Simoni; D Palli
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer--re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data.

Authors:  Oliver C Stoss; Andreas Scheel; Iris Nagelmeier; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Thomas Henkel; Giuseppe Viale; Bharat Jasani; Michael Untch; Josef Rüschoff
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.

Authors:  António Polónia; Dina Leitão; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Breast cancer: updated guideline recommendations for HER2 testing.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Characterization of HER2 gene amplification heterogeneity in invasive and in situ breast cancer using bright-field in situ hybridization.

Authors:  António Polónia; Guilherme Oliveira; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  'Non-classical' HER2 FISH results in breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Morgan Ballard; Florencia Jalikis; Gregor Krings; Rodney A Schmidt; Yunn-Yi Chen; Mara H Rendi; Suzanne M Dintzis; Kristin C Jensen; Robert B West; Richard K Sibley; Megan L Troxell; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  A significant subgroup of resectable gallbladder cancer patients has an HER2 positive status.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshida; Kazuaki Shimada; Tomoo Kosuge; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Impact of polysomy 17 on HER2 testing of invasive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Li Ma; Dequan Liu; Zhibing Yang; Chengang Yang; Zaoxiu Hu; Wenlin Chen; Zhuangqing Yang; Sijun Chen; Zhuoni Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15

9.  Agreement of Different Methods for Tissue Based Detection of HER2 Signal in Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gaurav Thakral; Andrew Wey; Mobeen Rahman; Rui Fang; Christopher Lum
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Monosomy of chromosome 17 in breast cancer during interpretation of HER2 gene amplification.

Authors:  Matteo Brunelli; Alessia Nottegar; Giuseppe Bogina; Anna Caliò; Luca Cima; Albino Eccher; Caterina Vicentini; Lisa Marcolini; Aldo Scarpa; Serena Pedron; Eleonora Brunello; Sakari Knuutila; Anna Sapino; Caterina Marchiò; Emilio Bria; Annamaria Molino; Luisa Carbognin; Giampaolo Tortora; Bharat Jasani; Keith Miller; Ibrahim Merdol; Lucia Zanatta; Licia Laurino; Tiina Wirtanen; Giuseppe Zamboni; Marcella Marconi; Marco Chilosi; Erminia Manfrin; Guido Martignoni; Franco Bonetti
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.