Literature DB >> 2380750

Infrared analysis of volatile anesthetics: impact of monitor agent setting, volatile mixtures, and alcohol.

D C Guyton1, N Gravenstein.   

Abstract

Infrared analysis can determine exhaled concentrations of the three volatile anesthetics in common use because each absorbs infrared light. Many infrared analyzers use a single source of infrared light at a wavelength of 3.3 microns for measurements of all three agents but cannot identify which agent is in use. Organic gases such as ethanol also absorb infrared light. This study determined the effects on the accuracy of a single-wavelength infrared anesthetic monitor (Capnomac, Puritan-Bennett PB254) of (1) incorrect anesthetic agent setting, (2) mixtures of volatile anesthetics, and (3) ethanol vapor in the analyzed gas. Changing the agent setting on the monitor during steady-state delivery of an agent resulted in readings for the halothane setting five times higher than those for the enflurane setting, and six times higher than those for the isoflurane setting. These ratios reflect the monitor's fixed internal gain for each agent setting. Mixtures of anesthetics had a simple additive effect on the monitor's accuracy. With the monitor set for halothane, 0.2 vol% isoflurane mixed with halothane caused readings 1.2 vol% higher than the true halothane concentration. Conversely, with the monitor set for isoflurane, 1 vol% halothane mixed with isoflurane resulted in readings 0.2 vol% too high. In a model simulating alveolar gas, ethanol vapor corresponding to blood alcohol levels of 0.10, 0.30, and 0.50% had a slight but not clinically significant effect on readings for enflurane and isoflurane but increased readings with the halothane setting 3.5 times the corresponding level of blood alcohol. Clinicians can test for an interfering gas such as ethanol before induction by checking the reading in the halothane setting during preoxygenation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2380750     DOI: 10.1007/bf02832147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  3 in total

1.  "Normac" falsely recognizes "fruit extract" as an anesthetic agent.

Authors:  M Yamashita; S Tsuneto
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  An evaluation of the Datex Normac anaesthetic agent monitor.

Authors:  A D Colquhoun; W M Gray; A J Asbury
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Evaluation of the Datex 'Normac' anaesthetic agent monitor.

Authors:  N P Luff; D C White
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.955

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of three transportable multigas anesthetic monitors: the Bruel & Kjaer Anesthetic Gas Monitor 1304, the Datex Capnomac Ultima, and the Nellcor N-2500.

Authors:  J Nielsen; T Kann; J T Moller
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-04

2.  Erroneous data from an infrared anesthetic gas analyzer.

Authors:  J E Morrison; C McDonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-09

3.  Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer.

Authors:  F E Block; G T Schulte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Accuracy and cross-sensitivity of 10 different anesthetic gas monitors.

Authors:  B Walder; R Lauber; A M Zbinden
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.