Literature DB >> 12578063

Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer.

F E Block1, G T Schulte.   

Abstract

The creation of agent mixtures from the addition of the wrong agent to a vaporizer might pose a risk to the patient. Patient injury would be more likely if the anesthesia gas monitor displayed erroneous concentration values. Conventional inhalation agent monitors do not necessarily distinguish anesthetic agents. Some modern monitors have that ability but its clinical significance has not been determined. We wanted to simulate such an erroneous mixture in a laboratory setup. Six comparisons were made. Isoflurane, Enflurane, and Halothane vaporizers were first filled with the correct agent. They were run at 5 liters/minute fresh oxygen flow at a vaporizer dial setting of 5% until it reached the "refill" line. Then, one of two incorrect agents was added to the "full" line. Thereafter, the vaporizer continued at the same flow and the same dial setting until it was exhausted. Vaporizer output was recorded or calculated by using three methods of measurement: mass spectrometry, conventional infrared analysis (at 3.3 micrometer wave length), and piezoelectric crystal analysis. Additional calculations were used to estimate measurements that could not be made because of lack of available equipment. In a Halothane vaporizer: Enflurane added--not a significant problem; Isoflurane added--not a significant problem. In an Isoflurane vaporizer: Halothane added--not a significant problem; Enflurane added--not a significant problem. In an Enflurane vaporizer: Isoflurane added--not a significant problem; Halothane added--the sum of the delivered Halothane MAC and the delivered Enflurane MAC was twice the expected Enflurane MAC output from vaporizer, with conventional agent monitor reading which showed decreasing agent concentration. Patient injury could be more likely in this last case. In this last case and in all cases, piezoelectric crystal monitoring correctly displayed the sum of the two agent concentrations in volumes percent. Automatic agent identification can identify erroneous agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12578063     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009979531850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  6 in total

1.  Infrared analysis of volatile anesthetics: impact of monitor agent setting, volatile mixtures, and alcohol.

Authors:  D C Guyton; N Gravenstein
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-07

2.  Inadvertent change of volatile anesthetics in anesthesia machines.

Authors:  J H Karis; D B Menzel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Hazards of agent-specific vaporizers: a case report of successful resuscitation after massive isoflurane overdose.

Authors:  S T Martin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Hazards of mis-filled vaporizers: summary tables.

Authors:  R T Chilcoat
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Vaporization of mixed anesthetic liquids.

Authors:  D L Bruce; H W Linde
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Consequences of misfilling contemporary vaporizers with desflurane.

Authors:  J J Andrews; R V Johnston; G C Kramer
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.063

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of oxygen, anaesthesia agent and flows in anaesthesia machine.

Authors:  Rakesh Garg; Ramesh Chand Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.