| Literature DB >> 23805269 |
Wenlan Zhang1, Martina Bielaszewska, Lisa Kunsmann, Alexander Mellmann, Andreas Bauwens, Robin Köck, Annelene Kossow, Agnes Anders, Sören Gatermann, Helge Karch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli O104:H4 that caused the large German outbreak in 2011 is a highly virulent hybrid of enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteroaggregative (EAEC) E. coli. The strain displays "stacked-brick" aggregative adherence to human intestinal epithelial cells mediated by aggregative adherence fimbriae I (AAF/I) encoded on the pAA plasmid. The AAF/I-mediated augmented intestinal adherence might facilitate systemic absorption of Shiga toxin, the major virulence factor of EHEC, presumably enhancing virulence of the outbreak strain. However, the stability of pAA in the outbreak strain is unknown. We therefore tested outbreak isolates for pAA, monitored pAA loss during infection, and determined the impact of pAA loss on adherence and clinical outcome of infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23805269 PMCID: PMC3689698 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of pAA-positive and pAA-negative EHEC O104:H4 isolatesa and clinical outcomes of infection in the respective patients.
| Patient designation (Diagnosis) | Isolate no. | Presence of pAA-encoded virulence loci (PCR/plasmid hybridization with probe) | Plasmid profile (kb) |
| Stx2atiter | AA | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| A (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 128 | yes | ||
| 2 (7) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
| B (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 256 | yes | ||
| 2 (3) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
| C (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 64 | yes | ||
| 2 (2) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 64 | no | |||
| D (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 256 | yes | ||
| 2 (4) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 256 | no | |||
| E (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 128 | yes | ||
| 2 (8) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
| F (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 64 | yes | ||
| 2 (2) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
| G (HUS) | 1 | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | 88; 75 | + | 128 | yes | ||
| 2 (5) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 256 | no | |||
| H (BD) | 1 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | ||
| 2 (5) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
| I (D) | 1 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | ||
| 2 (3) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
| J (BD) | 1 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 64 | no | ||
| 2 (6) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 64 | no | |||
| K (D) | 1 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 256 | no | ||
| 2 (4) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 256 | no | |||
| L (D) | 1 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | ||
| 2 (5) | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | 88 | + | 128 | no | |||
The identity of all isolates as EHEC O104:H4 outbreak strain was confirmed using the multiplex real-time PCR targeting rfb O104, fliC H4, and stx 2a [24] and multilocus sequence typing, which demonstrated that all belong to ST678 typical for the outbreak strain [8].
HUS, hemolytic uremic syndrome; BD, bloody diarrhea; D, diarrhea without visible blood.
1, initial isolate; 2, follow-up isolate; the number in parenthesis indicates the time interval between recovery of the initial and the follow-up isolate.
+/+, PCR amplicon of corresponding size and hybridization signal on the 75-kb plasmid present; −/−, no PCR amplicon, no hybridization signal present.
Sizes of plasmids in kilobase pairs (kb).
Stx2a titers were defined as the highest dilutions of sterile culture filtrates that caused cytotoxicity in 50% Vero cells after 72 h.
AA, aggregative adherence pattern (HCT-8 cells).
Figure 1Loss of pAA by EHEC O104:H4 outbreak strain as demonstrated by plasmid profiling.
Isolated plasmids were separated using 0.6% agarose gel, visualized by staining with Midori green and photographed. Lane M, molecular size marker (plasmids from E. coli 39r861). In lanes 1 to 10, plasmid profiles of EHEC O104:H4 outbreak isolates from the following patients are shown (patients’ designations refer to Table 1): Lane 1, initial isolate from patient A (pAA-positive); lane 2, follow-up isolate from patient A (pAA-negative); lane 3, initial isolate from patient C (pAA-positive); lane 4, follow-up isolate from patient C (pAA-negative); lane 5, initial isolate from patient G (pAA-positive); lane 6, follow-up isolate from patient G (pAA-negative); lane 7, reference EHEC O104:H4 outbreak isolate LB226692 [8]; lane 8, initial isolate from patient H (pAA-negative); lane 9, follow-up isolate from patient H (pAA-negative). Sizes of the pAA (75 kb) and pESBL (88 kb) plasmids are indicated on the right side.
Qualitative and quantitative analyses of pAA-positive bacteria in the paired initial and follow-up stool samples.
| Patient designation (Diagnosis) | Stool sample | pAA plasmidin isolate | Presence ofpAA+ bacteriain stool sample | % of pAA+ colonies |
|
| A (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 82.3 | |
| 2 (7) | – | + | 8.5 | 0.01 | |
| B (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 67.4 | |
| 2 (3) | – | + | 17.3 | <0.001 | |
| C (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 43.2 | |
| 2 (2) | – | + | 26.7 | 0.002 | |
| D (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 48.3 | |
| 2 (4) | – | + | 20.1 | 0.003 | |
| E (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 57.6 | |
| 2 (8) | – | + | 4.9 | 0.031 | |
| F (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 49.1 | |
| 2 (2) | – | + | 20.9 | 0.004 | |
| G (HUS) | 1 | + | + | 38.4 | |
| 2 (5) | – | + | 2.2 | 0.002 | |
| H (BD) | 1 | – | – | 0 | n.a. |
| 2 (5) | – | – | 0 | n.a. | |
| I (D) | 1 | – | – | 0 | n.a. |
| 2 (3) | – | – | 0 | n.a. | |
| J (BD) | 1 | – | – | 0 | n.a. |
| 2 (6) | – | – | 0 | n.a. | |
| K (D) | 1 | – | – | 0 | n.a. |
| 2 (4) | – | – | 0 | n.a. | |
| L (D) | 1 | – | – | 0 | n.a. |
| 2 (5) | – | – | 0 | n.a. |
HUS, hemolytic uremic syndrome; BD, bloody diarrhea; D, diarrhea without visible blood.
1, initial stool sample; 2, follow-up stool sample; the number in parenthesis indicates the time interval between collection of the initial and the follow-up stool sample.
+, the isolate contained all pAA-encoded virulence genes (aatA, aggR, aggC, aap, sepA) in PCR and harbored a 75-kb plasmid hybridizing with pCVD432, aggR, aggC, aap, and sepA probes. -, the isolate lacked all pAA-encoded virulence genes in PCR and lacked the 75-kb plasmid in plasmid profiling.
+, an amplicon of corresponding size was obtained from the whole stool culture harvested from ESBL agar in PCR with primers pCVD432/start and pCVD432/stop [30];
-, no PCR amplicon from the whole stool culture was obtained with these primers.
Determined by colony blot hybridization of stool cultures plated on ESBL agar with the pCVD432 probe and calculated from the total numbers of colonies grown on the plates.
Paired Student's t test (P<0.05 considered significant); n.a., not applicable.
Figure 2pAA is lost by the outbreak strain in the course of infection.
Enrichment cultures of the initial and follow-up stool samples from patients A to G diluted to give rise to 150–200 well-separated colonies were plated on ESBL agar and pAA-positive colonies were identified using colony hybridization with the pCVD432 probe. The percentages of pCVD432-positive colonies among all colonies grown on the plates were calculated. The numbers above the columns indicate the time interval (days) between collection of the initial (black bars) and follow-up (white bars) stool samples. In all cases the percentage of pAA-positive colonies in the follow-up stool is significantly lower than that in the initial stool (P≤0.01; Table 2).
Figure 3Loss of pAA by EHEC O104:H4 outbreak strain leads to the loss of the aggregative “stacked-brick” adherence to HCT-8 cells.
HCT-8 monolayers were incubated with overnight cultures of initial or follow-up isolates from patients A, C and F for 3 h in the presence of 0.5% D-mannose. The cells were washed, fixed and stained with 10% Giemsa. Bacterial adherence patterns were examined using light microscopy (AxioImagerA1; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). (A, C, E) adherence phenotypes of the initial pAA-positive isolates from patients A, C, and G, respectively. (B, D, F) adherence phenotypes of the pAA-negative follow-up isolates from the respective patients are shown. Data from one of three experiments are shown. Bar = 10 µm.