| Literature DB >> 23805214 |
Yoshihiro Kamada1, Maaya Akita, Yuri Takeda, Shin Yamada, Hideki Fujii, Yoshiyuki Sawai, Yoshinori Doi, Hitomi Asazawa, Kotarosumitomo Nakayama, Kayo Mizutani, Hironobu Fujii, Takayuki Yakushijin, Masanori Miyazaki, Hisao Ezaki, Naoki Hiramatsu, Yuichi Yoshida, Shinichi Kiso, Yasuharu Imai, Norifumi Kawada, Tetsuo Takehara, Eiji Miyoshi.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a growing medical problem around the world. NAFLD patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The ability to distinguish NASH from simple steatosis would be of great clinical significance. Ballooning hepatocytes are characteristic of typical pathological NASH; here, the polarized secretion of proteins is disrupted due to destruction of the cytoskeleton. We previously reported that fucosylated glycoproteins are secreted into bile, but not into sera in normal liver. Therefore, we hypothesized that the fucosylation-based sorting machinery would be disrupted in ballooning hepatocytes, and serum fucosylated glycoproteins would increase in NASH patients. To confirm our hypothesis, we evaluated serum fucosylated haptoglobin (Fuc-Hpt) levels in biopsy-proven NAFLD patients (n = 126) using a lectin-antibody ELISA kit. Fuc-Hpt levels were significantly increased in NASH patients compared with non-NASH (NAFLD patients without NASH) patients. Interestingly, Fuc-Hpt levels showed a significant stepwise increase with increasing hepatocyte ballooning scores. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that Fuc-Hpt levels were independent and significant determinants of the presence of ballooning hepatocytes. Moreover, Fuc-Hpt levels were useful in monitoring liver fibrosis staging. Next, to investigate the significance of serum Fuc-Hpt in a larger population, we measured Fuc-Hpt levels in ultrasound-diagnosed NAFLD subjects (n = 870) who received a medical health checkup. To evaluate NAFLD disease severity, we used the FIB-4 index (based on age, serum AST and ALT levels, and platelet counts). Fuc-Hpt levels increased stepwise with increasing FIB-4 index.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23805214 PMCID: PMC3689816 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical and serological characteristics of the biopsy-proven NAFLD patients.
| Factor | All subjects (n = 126) | nonNASH (n = 19) | NASH (n = 107) |
|
|
| 54.4±12.8 | 46.9±13.6 | 55.7±12.3 | <0.01 |
|
| 70/56 | 13/6 | 57/50 | 0.2207 |
|
| 27.5±5.1 | 27.0±4.1 | 27.5±5.2 | 0.5646 |
|
| 62.9±39.3 | 44.2±36.5 | 66.3±39.0 | <0.01 |
|
| 95.8±72.0 | 71.9±48.8 | 100.1±74.7 | 0.0809 |
|
| 0.74±0.28 | 0.64±0.21 | 0.76±0.29 | 0.0752 |
|
| 111.8±117.2 | 146.5±172.8 | 105.5±104.2 | 0.8392 |
|
| 200.2±38.7 | 209.5±27.8 | 198.6±40.2 | 0.1690 |
|
| 152.8±78.7 | 145.4±60.6 | 154.2±81.8 | 0.8933 |
|
| 113.3±36.8 | 110.3±35.3 | 113.9±37.2 | 0.5067 |
|
| 13.7±11.3 | 9.28±4.69 | 14.38±11.84 | <0.05 |
|
| 4.14±0.43 | 4.26±0.30 | 4.12±0.44 | 0.1187 |
|
| 334.1±358.1 | 181.4±140.8 | 362.6±379.0 | <0.05 |
|
| 200.3±64.3 | 248.8±67.1 | 191.7±60.1 | <0.01 |
|
| 73.0±91.9 | 26.5±17.8 | 81.1±97.1 | <0.01 |
|
| 2.11±1.47 | 1.02±0.70 | 2.30±1.49 | <0.01 |
|
| 573.8±965.7 | 111.1±202.1 | 655.9±1023.6 | <0.01 |
|
| 811.3±780.8 | 573.6±511.1 | 854.3±814.6 | <0.05 |
|
| 89.3±29.5 | 89.4±29.9 | 89.3±29.5 | 0.9945 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase; IRI, immunoreactive insulin; Fuc-Hpt, fucosylated haptoglobin.
P values correspond to the comparison between nonNASH and NASH group. Wilcoxon test for continuous factors and Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical factors were used.
Figure 1Serum Fuc-Hpt levels were significantly elevated in biopsy-proven NASH patients.
(A) Serum Fuc-Hpt levels in each group (normal controls, non-NASH patients, NASH patients). Horizontal grey lines indicate the mean values of Fuc-Hpt in each group. NC, normal controls. (B) ROC curves for Fuc-Hpt and the M30 antigen for the discrimination of NASH.
Clinical and serological characteristics of the biopsy-proven NAFLD patients classified by hepatocyte ballooning score.
| Hepatocyte ballooning score | ||||
| Variables | 0 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
| 24 | 39 | 63 | |
|
| 46.1±12.7 | 52.9±12.2 | 58.4±11.7 | <0.01 |
|
| 13/11 | 27/12 | 29/34 | 0.0734 |
|
| 26.9±4.0 | 27.4±4.2 | 27.7±5.9 | 0.8026 |
|
| 43.5±32.6 | 66.4±42.1 | 68.2±38.1 | <0.01 |
|
| 78.0±47.0 | 106.7±84.8 | 95.9±70.9 | 0.4322 |
|
| 0.60±0.21 | 0.71±0.24 | 0.81±0.31 | <0.01 |
|
| 133.4±157.4 | 102.0±81.4 | 109.6±119.2 | 0.9181 |
|
| 214.6±29.5 | 200.1±40.0 | 194.9±40.1 | 0.0633 |
|
| 153.2±62.6 | 157.4±89.9 | 149.9±78.2 | 0.7822 |
|
| 107.1±32.2 | 112.1±41.9 | 116.5±35.3 | <0.05 |
|
| 9.45±4.97 | 10.97±5.62 | 17.20±14.55 | <0.05 |
|
| 4.27±0.28 | 4.22±0.45 | 4.04±0.44 | <0.05 |
|
| 233.3±267.9 | 301.4±286.2 | 392.0±46.0 | <0.05 |
|
| 250.2±61.5 | 193.5±55.5 | 185.6±61.8 | <0.01 |
|
| 25.1±16.1 | 58.8±61.4 | 99.9±113.5 | <0.01 |
|
| 0.97±0.64 | 2.07±1.42 | 2.57±1.50 | <0.01 |
|
| 101.5±187.0 | 365.1±573.6 | 882.9±1206.2 | <0.01 |
|
| 586.0±493.6 | 720.3±690.1 | 954.3±895.8 | 0.17 |
|
| 88.1±29.1 | 93.5±30.7 | 87.3±29.1 | 0.5526 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
Figure 2Correlation between serum Fuc-Hpt levels and hepatocyte ballooning scores in biopsy-proven NAFLD patients.
(A) Serum Fuc-Hpt levels in each group classified by hepatocyte ballooning scores. (B) ROC curves for Fuc-Hpt and the M30 antigen for the presence of ballooning hepatocytes.
Figure 3Correlation between serum Fuc-Hpt levels and liver fibrosis stage in biopsy-proven NAFLD patients.
(A) Serum Fuc-Hpt levels in each stage of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. (B) ROC curves for Fuc-Hpt and the M30 antigen for discrimination of advanced liver fibrosis in biopsy-proven NAFLD patients.
Multiple logistic regression analysis of factors associated with hepatocyte ballooning score 1–2 compared to score 0.
| 95% CI | ||||
| Factor | Odds ratio | Lower | Upper |
|
|
| 1.0737 | 1.0036 | 1.1596 | <0.05 |
|
| 1.0343 | 0.8749 | 1.2624 | 0.7053 |
|
| 1.0183 | 1.0001 | 1.0417 | <0.05 |
|
| 0.9964 | 0.9892 | 1.0022 | 0.2326 |
|
| 0.9902 | 0.9670 | 1.0143 | 0.4102 |
|
| 0.9991 | 0.9867 | 1.0128 | 0.8861 |
|
| 1.0755 | 0.9719 | 1.2688 | 0.1877 |
|
| 0.9996 | 0.9969 | 1.0033 | 0.8133 |
|
| 0.9792 | 0.9600 | 0.9940 | <0.01 |
|
| 1.4196 | 1.0171 | 2.7146 | <0.05 |
|
| 1.0000 | 0.9989 | 1.0014 | 0.9386 |
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of NAFLD subjects in the health check-up study.
| Variables | NAFLD subjects |
|
| 870 |
|
| 55.3±6.8 |
|
| 659/211 |
|
| 26.2±3.6 |
|
| 120.8±15.6 |
|
| 73.0±10.7 |
|
| 31.6±17.6 |
|
| 43.4±25.0 |
|
| 0.87±0.39 |
|
| 64.5±71.5 |
|
| 4.4±0.2 |
|
| 211.0±35.0 |
|
| 152.0±93.2 |
|
| 53.9±11.4 |
|
| 122.0±34.1 |
|
| 0.83±0.36 |
|
| 6.0±1.3 |
|
| 114.7±38.8 |
|
| 222.4±53.0 |
|
| 1.32±0.72 |
|
| 190.6±235.7 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
Clinical and serological characteristics of the NAFLD subjects in health check-up study classified by FIB-4 index categories.
| FIB-4 index (cutoff values proposed by Shah et al.) | ||||
| Variables | Low cutoff point (<1.30) | Indeterminate (1.30–2.67) | High cutoff point (>2.67) |
|
|
| 525 | 315 | 30 | |
|
| 53.2±5.7 | 58.2±6.9 | 62.2±8.7 | <0.01 |
|
| 391/134 | 244/71 | 24/6 | 0.5283 (chi square test) |
|
| 26.4±3.7 | 25.9±3.5 | 25.2±4.3 | 0.0585 |
|
| 119.7±15.7 | 122.3±15.5 | 122±15.0 | <0.05 |
|
| 73.1±11.0 | 73.2±10.2 | 70.1±10.3 | 0.201 |
|
| 26.9±9.6 | 36.3±16.7 | 64.9±53.2 | <0.01 |
|
| 41.5±22.4 | 45.9±27.8 | 52.0±32.1 | 0.0946 |
|
| 0.73±0.20 | 0.91±0.32 | 1.51±1.25 | <0.01 |
|
| 57.8±53.2 | 65.6±61.5 | 172.6±219.4 | <0.01 |
|
| 4.4±0.2 | 4.4±0.2 | 4.3±0.3 | 0.1697 |
|
| 213.8±35.0 | 208.4±34.4 | 187.8±32.5 | <0.01 |
|
| 150.6±86.5 | 152.5±99.0 | 172.7±136.4 | 0.9267 |
|
| 53.2±10.8 | 54.8±11.9 | 57.7±15.0 | 0.1211 |
|
| 122.9±35.5 | 120.7±31.9 | 121.6±32.9 | 0.5514 |
|
| 0.82±0.42 | 0.84±0.22 | 0.88±0.23 | 0.0824 |
|
| 6.0±1.3 | 6.0±1.3 | 5.7±1.2 | 0.364 |
|
| 111.5±36.5 | 116.3±37.8 | 147.5±63.3 | <0.01 |
|
| 246.2±47.8 | 190.0±35.8 | 144.8±35.7 | <0.01 |
|
| 0.95±0.21 | 1.69±0.34 | 3.92±1.61 | <0.01 |
|
| 168.3±194.0 | 200.2±231.7 | 447.7±556.5 | <0.01 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol.
P values correspond to the comparison among groups. Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous factors and Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical factors were used.