Literature DB >> 23801396

Inappropriateness of breast imaging: cost analysis.

Chiara Adriana Pistolese1, Anna Micaela Ciarrapico, Francesca della Gatta, Giovanni Simonetti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess how an incorrect indication for an examination may affect the diagnostic workup and diagnosis as well as healthcare expenditure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered all the requests for breast imaging (mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging) received by our radiology department between October 2010 and December 2010, and assessed their appropriateness based on the patient's age and the clinical question, if present. We then analysed the unnecessary costs resulting from inappropriate requests.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 1500 requests for ultrasound examination, the request was appropriate in 855 (57%) cases; out of a total of 2350 requests for mammography, the request was appropriate in 493 (21%) cases; out of a total of 100 requests for magnetic resonance imaging, the request was appropriate in 83 (83%) cases. The cost deriving from inappropriate requests was 51,235.04 Euros.
CONCLUSIONS: Improving the timeliness of diagnosis is an important goal to be pursued by enhancing the available health services, improving communication and coordination of the different professionals involved and optimising diagnostic pathways in order to reduce healthcare spending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801396     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0948-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  11 in total

1.  Breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Stephen P Fitzgerald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Effect of population-based screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Karin Bock; Bettina Borisch; Jenny Cawson; Berit Damtjernhaug; Chris de Wolf; Peter Dean; Ard den Heeten; Gregory Doyle; Rosemary Fox; Alfonso Frigerio; Fiona Gilbert; Gerold Hecht; Walter Heindel; Sylvia Helen Heywang-Köbrunner; Roland Holland; Fran Jones; Anders Lernevall; Silvia Madai; Adrian Mairs; Jennifer Muller; Patric Nisbet; Ann O'Doherty; Julietta Patnick; Nick Perry; Lisa Regitz-Jedermann; Mary Rickard; Vitor Rodrigues; Marco Rosselli Del Turco; Astrid Scharpantgen; Walter Schwartz; Brigitte Seradour; Per Skaane; Laszlo Tabar; Sven Tornberg; Giske Ursin; Erik Van Limbergen; Anne Vandenbroucke; Linda J Warren; Lee Warwick; Martin Yaffe; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  [Breast cancer mortality versus breast cancer survival].

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2010-02-11

Review 4.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christiane Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Value of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound) in evaluating breast disease.

Authors:  C A Pistolese; T Perretta; E Cossu; F Della Gatta; S Giura; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  The role of ultrasound in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ginger P Hatfield; Michael T Hogan
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2009-10

8.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Kathleen A Cronin; Sylvia K Plevritis; Dennis G Fryback; Lauren Clarke; Marvin Zelen; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Andrei Y Yakovlev; J Dik F Habbema; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Contribution of early detection and adjuvant treatments to breast cancer mortality reduction in Catalonia, Spain.

Authors:  Ester Vilaprinyo; Teresa Puig; Montserrat Rue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.