Literature DB >> 21431300

Value of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound) in evaluating breast disease.

C A Pistolese1, T Perretta, E Cossu, F Della Gatta, S Giura, G Simonetti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the role of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging in evaluating breast disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred patients aged between 35 and 75 years were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent detailed history and clinical examination, ultrasound (US) and mammography. US scans were repeated after mammography. All suspicious lesions were studied by cytological and histological characterisation and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
RESULTS: The first US scan showed 147 solid lesions, 67 lesions characterised by posterior acoustic shadowing and 193 areas of heterogeneous echostructure. The second US scan, performed after mammography, confirmed 123/147 solid nodular lesions, 53/67 lesions characterised by posterior acoustic shadowing and 183/193 areas of heterogeneous echostructure; it also showed 13 nodular lesions not seen on the first scan and two cases of nodular lesions with irregular calcifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that US not performed in conjunction with mammography gives rise to incorrect diagnostic interpretations (either false positive or false negative results). The detection rate of the US scan performed after mammography increases from 4.16% to 5.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21431300     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0657-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  14 in total

1.  Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.

Authors:  Se Yeong Chung; Woo Kyung Moon; Ji Won Choi; Nariya Cho; Mijung Jang; Kwang Gi Kim
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Breast density analysis for whole breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Kuang-Che Chang Chien; Etsuo Takada; Woo Kyung Moon; Jeffery H K Wu; Nariya Cho; Yi-Fa Wang; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Breast cancer and aging. Clinical interactions.

Authors:  G G Kimmick; L Balducci
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.722

4.  Comparison of conventional, compounding, computer enhancement, and compounding with computer enhancement in ultrasound imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Roberto L Maldonado; Dianne Georgian-Smith
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.657

5.  Effect of clinical information on diagnostic performance in breast sonography.

Authors:  Song-Ee Baek; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Hye-Jeong Lee; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients.

Authors:  M McCavert; M E O'Donnell; S Aroori; S A Badger; M A Sharif; J G Crothers; R A J Spence
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease.

Authors:  L Ballesio; C Maggi; S Savelli; M Angeletti; P Rabuffi; L Manganaro; L M Porfiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone.

Authors:  Ayumi Izumori; Koji Takebe; Akira Sato
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 10.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inappropriateness of breast imaging: cost analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Francesca della Gatta; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinic.

Authors:  V Palazzetti; F Guidi; L Ottaviani; G Valeri; S Baldassarre; G M Giuseppetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.469

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.