Literature DB >> 2380073

Appropriateness of admissions and discharges among readmitted patients.

R L Ludke1, N M MacDowell, B M Booth, S A Hunter.   

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between appropriateness of readmission within two weeks of discharge and appropriateness of previous admission and discharge, bed section, type of readmission, and patient demographic, medical condition, and hospital stay characteristics. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Patient Treatment File and medical records, 445 readmissions to a highly affiliated midwestern VA Medical Center in fiscal year 1984 were examined. Appropriateness was determined by four trained medical record abstractors using InterQual admission and discharge standards. Type of readmission was based on a pilot-tested flowchart. Appropriateness of readmission was significantly associated with that of the previous admission and discharge, with the relationship varying by admission, discharge, and readmission bed sections. Reasons for inappropriate admissions, discharges, and readmissions also varied by bed section. For the majority of inappropriate readmissions, there was clear written evidence in the medical record during the previous hospital stay that the patient was directed to return for readmission. Inappropriate readmissions were more likely than appropriate readmissions to have a primary diagnosis of neoplasm or digestive disorder. These results indicate the importance of examining both the operational efficiencies during the previous admission and the clinical criteria for admitting, discharging, and readmitting patients in assessing the appropriateness of readmissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2380073      PMCID: PMC1065641     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  6 in total

1.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care.

Authors:  P M Gertman; J D Restuccia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  High-cost users of medical care.

Authors:  C J Zook; F D Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Repeated hospitalization for the same disease: a multiplier of national health costs.

Authors:  C J Zook; S F Savickis; F D Moore
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1980

5.  Hospital readmissions in the Medicare population.

Authors:  G F Anderson; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Can readmissions to a geriatric medical unit be prevented?

Authors:  H Graham; B Livesley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-02-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?

Authors:  N Kalant; M Berlinguet; J G Diodati; L Dragatakis; F Marcotte
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review.

Authors:  C DeCoster; N P Roos; K C Carrière; S Peterson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Classifying general medicine readmissions. Are they preventable? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies in Health Services Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmissions.

Authors:  E Z Oddone; M Weinberger; M Horner; C Mengel; F Goldstein; P Ginier; D Smith; J Huey; N J Farber; D A Asch; L Loo; E Mack; A G Hurder; W Henderson; J R Feussner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Towards a patient journey perspective on causes of unplanned readmissions using a classification framework: results of a systematic review with narrative synthesis.

Authors:  R G Singotani; F Karapinar; C Brouwers; C Wagner; M C de Bruijne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.