OBJECTIVE: Many adolescents with substance use problems show poor response to evidence-based treatments. Treatment outcome has been associated with individual differences in impulsive decision making as reflected by delay discounting (DD) rates (preference for immediate rewards). Adolescents with higher rates of DD were expected to show greater neural activation in brain regions mediating impulsive/habitual behavioral choices and less activation in regions mediating reflective/executive behavioral choices. METHOD: Thirty adolescents being treated for substance abuse completed a DD task optimized to balance choices of immediate versus delayed rewards, and a control condition accounted for activation during magnitude valuation. A group independent component analysis on functional magnetic resonance imaging time courses identified neural networks engaged during DD. Network activity was correlated with individual differences in discounting rate. RESULTS: Higher discounting rates were associated with diminished engagement of an executive attention control network involving the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, cingulate cortex, and precuneus. Higher discounting rates also were associated with less deactivation in a "bottom-up" reward valuation network involving the amygdala, hippocampus, insula, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These 2 networks were significantly negatively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Results support relations between competing executive and reward valuation neural networks and temporal decision making, an important, potentially modifiable risk factor relevant for the prevention and treatment of adolescent substance abuse. Clinical trial registration information-The Neuroeconomics of Behavioral Therapies for Adolescent Substance Abuse, http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT01093898.
OBJECTIVE: Many adolescents with substance use problems show poor response to evidence-based treatments. Treatment outcome has been associated with individual differences in impulsive decision making as reflected by delay discounting (DD) rates (preference for immediate rewards). Adolescents with higher rates of DD were expected to show greater neural activation in brain regions mediating impulsive/habitual behavioral choices and less activation in regions mediating reflective/executive behavioral choices. METHOD: Thirty adolescents being treated for substance abuse completed a DD task optimized to balance choices of immediate versus delayed rewards, and a control condition accounted for activation during magnitude valuation. A group independent component analysis on functional magnetic resonance imaging time courses identified neural networks engaged during DD. Network activity was correlated with individual differences in discounting rate. RESULTS: Higher discounting rates were associated with diminished engagement of an executive attention control network involving the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, cingulate cortex, and precuneus. Higher discounting rates also were associated with less deactivation in a "bottom-up" reward valuation network involving the amygdala, hippocampus, insula, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These 2 networks were significantly negatively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Results support relations between competing executive and reward valuation neural networks and temporal decision making, an important, potentially modifiable risk factor relevant for the prevention and treatment of adolescent substance abuse. Clinical trial registration information-The Neuroeconomics of Behavioral Therapies for Adolescent Substance Abuse, http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT01093898.
Authors: J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Yukiko Washio; Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Todd L McKerchar; Gary J Badger; Joan M Skelly; Robert L Dantona Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Mark L Rubinstein; Tracy L Luks; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Wendy Dryden; Michelle A Rait; Gregory V Simpson Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Elizabeth A Olson; Paul F Collins; Catalina J Hooper; Ryan Muetzel; Kelvin O Lim; Monica Luciana Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Mikhail N Koffarnus; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Jonathan M Lisinski; Anders Eklund; Warren K Bickel; Stephen M LaConte Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kara L Kerr; Jason A Avery; Joel C Barcalow; Scott E Moseman; Jerzy Bodurka; Patrick S F Bellgowan; W Kyle Simmons Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Hedy Kober; Elise E DeVito; Cameron M DeLeone; Kathleen M Carroll; Marc N Potenza Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Marieta Pehlivanova; Daniel H Wolf; Aristeidis Sotiras; Antonia N Kaczkurkin; Tyler M Moore; Rastko Ciric; Philip A Cook; Angel Garcia de La Garza; Adon F G Rosen; Kosha Ruparel; Anup Sharma; Russell T Shinohara; David R Roalf; Ruben C Gur; Christos Davatzikos; Raquel E Gur; Joseph W Kable; Theodore D Satterthwaite Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Kyle M Baumbauer; Erin E Young; Angela R Starkweather; Jessica W Guite; Beth S Russell; Renee C B Manworren Journal: Med Clin North Am Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.456