INTRODUCTION: There are limited data regarding the impact of marijuana (MJ) on cortical development during adolescence. Adolescence is a period of substantial brain maturation and cortical thickness abnormalities may be indicative of disruptions of normal cortical development. This investigation applied cortical-surface based techniques to compare cortical thickness measures in MJ using adolescents compared to non-using controls. METHODS: Eighteen adolescents with heavy MJ use and 18 non-using controls similar in age received MRI scans using a 3T Siemens scanner. Cortical reconstruction and volumetric segmentation was performed with FreeSurfer. Group differences in cortical thickness were assessed using statistical difference maps covarying for age and gender. RESULTS: Compared to non-users, MJ users had decreased cortical thickness in right caudal middle frontal, bilateral insula and bilateral superior frontal cortices. Marijuana users had increased cortical thickness in the bilateral lingual, right superior temporal, right inferior parietal and left paracentral regions. In the MJ users, negative correlations were found between frontal and lingual regions for urinary cannabinoid levels and between age of onset of use and the right superior frontal gyrus. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies to evaluate cortical thickness in a group of adolescents with heavy MJ use compared to non-users. Our findings are consistent with prior studies that documented abnormalities in prefrontal and insular regions. Our results suggest that age of regular use may be associated with altered prefrontal cortical gray matter development in adolescents. Furthermore, reduced insular cortical thickness may be a biological marker for increased risk of substance dependence.
INTRODUCTION: There are limited data regarding the impact of marijuana (MJ) on cortical development during adolescence. Adolescence is a period of substantial brain maturation and cortical thickness abnormalities may be indicative of disruptions of normal cortical development. This investigation applied cortical-surface based techniques to compare cortical thickness measures in MJ using adolescents compared to non-using controls. METHODS: Eighteen adolescents with heavy MJ use and 18 non-using controls similar in age received MRI scans using a 3T Siemens scanner. Cortical reconstruction and volumetric segmentation was performed with FreeSurfer. Group differences in cortical thickness were assessed using statistical difference maps covarying for age and gender. RESULTS: Compared to non-users, MJ users had decreased cortical thickness in right caudal middle frontal, bilateral insula and bilateral superior frontal cortices. Marijuana users had increased cortical thickness in the bilateral lingual, right superior temporal, right inferior parietal and left paracentral regions. In the MJ users, negative correlations were found between frontal and lingual regions for urinary cannabinoid levels and between age of onset of use and the right superior frontal gyrus. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies to evaluate cortical thickness in a group of adolescents with heavy MJ use compared to non-users. Our findings are consistent with prior studies that documented abnormalities in prefrontal and insular regions. Our results suggest that age of regular use may be associated with altered prefrontal cortical gray matter development in adolescents. Furthermore, reduced insular cortical thickness may be a biological marker for increased risk of substance dependence.
Authors: Harrison G Pope; Amanda J Gruber; James I Hudson; Geoffrey Cohane; Marilyn A Huestis; Deborah Yurgelun-Todd Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Golfo K Tzilos; Christina B Cintron; Jonas B R Wood; Norah S Simpson; Ashley D Young; Harrison G Pope; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2005 Jan-Feb
Authors: Daniel S O'Leary; Robert I Block; Julie A Koeppel; Michael Flaum; Susan K Schultz; Nancy C Andreasen; Laura Boles Ponto; G Leonard Watkins; Richard R Hurtig; Richard D Hichwa Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Heidi Terrio; Lisa A Brenner; Brian J Ivins; John M Cho; Katherine Helmick; Karen Schwab; Katherine Scally; Rick Bretthauer; Deborah Warden Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Susan F Tapert; Alecia D Schweinsburg; Sean P A Drummond; Martin P Paulus; Sandra A Brown; Tony T Yang; Lawrence R Frank Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2007-06-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Lindsay M Squeglia; Scott F Sorg; Alecia Dager Schweinsburg; Reagan R Wetherill; Carmen Pulido; Susan F Tapert Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: C Paula Lewis-de Los Angeles; Paige L Williams; Yanling Huo; Shirlene D Wang; Kristina A Uban; Megan M Herting; Kathleen Malee; Ram Yogev; John G Csernansky; Sharon Nichols; Russell B Van Dyke; Elizabeth R Sowell; Lei Wang Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Milena Radoman; Susanne S Hoeppner; Randi M Schuster; A Eden Evins; Jodi M Gilman Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Vanessa L Morris; Max M Owens; Sabrina K Syan; Tashia D Petker; Lawrence H Sweet; Assaf Oshri; James MacKillop; Michael Amlung Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: J Cobb Scott; Adon F G Rosen; Tyler M Moore; David R Roalf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Monica E Calkins; Kosha Ruparel; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Benedikt Fischer; Cayley Russell; Pamela Sabioni; Wim van den Brink; Bernard Le Foll; Wayne Hall; Jürgen Rehm; Robin Room Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Natalie Castellanos-Ryan; Jean-Baptiste Pingault; Sophie Parent; Frank Vitaro; Richard E Tremblay; Jean R Séguin Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2016-12-29