Literature DB >> 21517195

Delay discounting is associated with treatment response among cocaine-dependent outpatients.

Yukiko Washio1, Stephen T Higgins, Sarah H Heil, Todd L McKerchar, Gary J Badger, Joan M Skelly, Robert L Dantona.   

Abstract

Delay discounting (DD) describes the rate at which reinforcers lose value as the temporal delay to their receipt increases. Steeper discounting has been positively associated with vulnerability to substance use disorders, including cocaine use disorders. In the present study, we examined whether DD of hypothetical monetary reinforcers is associated with the duration of cocaine abstinence achieved among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Participants were 36 adults who were participating in a randomized controlled trial examining the efficacy of voucher-based contingency management (CM) using low-magnitude (N = 18) or high-magnitude (N = 18) voucher monetary values. DD was associated with the number of continuous weeks of cocaine abstinence achieved, even after adjusting for treatment condition during the initial 12-week, t(33) = 2.48, p = .045 and entire recommended 24-week of treatment, t(33) = 2.40, p = .022. Participants who exhibited steeper discounting functions achieved shorter periods of abstinence in the Low-magnitude voucher condition (12-week: t(16) = 2.48, p = .025; 24-week: t(16) = 2.68, p = .017), but not in the High-magnitude voucher condition (12-week: t(16) = 0.51, p = .618; 24-week: t(16) = 1.08, p = .298), although the interaction between DD and treatment condition was not significant (12-week: t(32) = -1.12, p = .271; 24-week: t(32) = -0.37, p = .712). These results provide further evidence on associations between DD and treatment response and extend those observations to a new clinical population (i.e., cocaine-dependent outpatients), while also suggesting that a more intensive intervention like the High-magnitude CM condition may diminish this negative relationship between DD and treatment response. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517195      PMCID: PMC3476946          DOI: 10.1037/a0023617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  22 in total

Review 1.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Delay discounting in currently using and currently abstinent cocaine-dependent outpatients and non-drug-using matched controls.

Authors:  Sarah H Heil; Matthew W Johnson; Stephen T Higgins; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers.

Authors:  Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Brady Reynolds; Amy M Duhig; Anne Smith; Thomas Liss; Amanda McFetridge; Dana A Cavallo; Kathleen M Carroll; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Turning k on its head: comments on use of an ED50 in delay discounting research.

Authors:  Jin H Yoon; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting.

Authors:  Matthe W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers.

Authors:  R E Vuchinich; C A Simpson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Community reinforcement therapy for cocaine-dependent outpatients.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Stacey C Sigmon; Conrad J Wong; Sarah H Heil; Gary J Badger; Robert Donham; Robert L Dantona; Stacey Anthony
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-10

8.  Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking?

Authors:  Janet Audrain-McGovern; Daniel Rodriguez; Leonard H Epstein; Jocelyn Cuevas; Kelli Rodgers; E Paul Wileyto
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Multidimensional assessment of impulsivity in undergraduate hazardous drinkers and controls.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Richard E Mattson; Emily J Anderson Mackillop; Bryan A Castelda; Peter J Donovick
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women.

Authors:  Jin H Yoon; Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Rena J Sugarbaker; Colleen S Thomas; Gary J Badger
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  A developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Alan J Budney; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-06-04

Review 2.  Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers.

Authors:  W K Bickel; D P Jarmolowicz; E T Mueller; C T Franck; C Carrin; K M Gatchalian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Predicting contingency management treatment outcomes for adolescent smokers.

Authors:  Arit M Harvanko; Justin C Strickland; Stacey A Slone; Brent J Shelton; Brady A Reynolds
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Baseline cocaine demand predicts contingency management treatment outcomes for cocaine-use disorder.

Authors:  Jin H Yoon; Robert Suchting; Sarah A McKay; Guadalupe G San Miguel; Anka A Vujanovic; Angela L Stotts; Scott D Lane; Jessica N Vincent; Michael F Weaver; Austin Lin; Joy M Schmitz
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-06-24

6.  Alternate versions of a fixed-choice, delay-discounting assessment for repeated-measures designs.

Authors:  Jinyi Kuang; Hannah Milhorn; Allison Stuppy-Sullivan; Soyeon Jung; Richard Yi
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Male, But Not Female, Alcohol-Dependent African Americans Discount Delayed Gains More Steeply than Propensity-Score Matched Controls.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Leonard Green; Carissa van den Berk-Clark; Richard A Grucza
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

9.  Delay discounting in adults receiving treatment for marijuana dependence.

Authors:  Erica N Peters; Nancy M Petry; Donna M Lapaglia; Brady Reynolds; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  Quantifying reinforcement value and demand for psychoactive substances in humans.

Authors:  Adrienne J Heinz; Todd C Lilje; Jon D Kassel; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.