OBJECTIVE: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates in the US population have shown a decline, American Indian (AI) CRC mortality rates appear to be increasing. CRC screening rates of AIs remain low when compared with other ethnic groups. The research team explored women's perceptions toward CRC screening, existing barriers, and suggestions to promote education and screening among AI women in Kansas and Missouri. METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, the authors conducted 7 focus groups with AI women older than 50 years (N = 52) to better understand their perceptions of and attitudes toward CRC screening. RESULTS: Women recognized barriers to screening, such as embarrassment, privacy issues, fear, insurance, and cost. They countered perceived barriers through inventive suggestions for education and awareness via social support systems and intergenerational relationships. DISCUSSION: CRC screening interventions for AI must be culturally tailored.
OBJECTIVE: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates in the US population have shown a decline, American Indian (AI) CRC mortality rates appear to be increasing. CRC screening rates of AIs remain low when compared with other ethnic groups. The research team explored women's perceptions toward CRC screening, existing barriers, and suggestions to promote education and screening among AI women in Kansas and Missouri. METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, the authors conducted 7 focus groups with AI women older than 50 years (N = 52) to better understand their perceptions of and attitudes toward CRC screening. RESULTS:Women recognized barriers to screening, such as embarrassment, privacy issues, fear, insurance, and cost. They countered perceived barriers through inventive suggestions for education and awareness via social support systems and intergenerational relationships. DISCUSSION: CRC screening interventions for AI must be culturally tailored.
Entities:
Keywords:
American Indian; colorectal cancer; colorectal cancer screening; community-based participatory research
Authors: Nancy Pandhi; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Shalini Kanekar; Daniel G Petereit; Maureen A Smith Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-11-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christine Makosky Daley; Aimee S James; Melissa Filippi; Maria Weir; Stacy Braiuca; Baljit Kaur; Won S Choi; K Allen Greiner Journal: J Health Dispar Res Pract Date: 2012
Authors: David G Perdue; Carin Perkins; Jeannette Jackson-Thompson; Steven S Coughlin; Faruque Ahmed; Donald S Haverkamp; Melissa A Jim Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Yamile Molina; Katherine J Briant; Janeth I Sanchez; Mary A O'Connell; Beti Thompson Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Melissa K Filippi; David G Perdue; Christina Hester; Angelia Cully; Lance Cully; K Allen Greiner; Christine M Daley Journal: J Cult Divers Date: 2016
Authors: Melanie Nadeau; Anne Walaszek; David G Perdue; Kristine L Rhodes; Donald Haverkamp; Jean Forster Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: R Brian Woodbury; Scott Ketchum; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Paul Spicer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-18 Impact factor: 3.390