BACKGROUND: Equitable distribution of health care resources relies on accurate morbidity and mortality data, classified by race. Accurate classification is a problem, particularly for non-federally recognized American Indians (AI) receiving care outside of the Indian Health Service. METHODS: We identified counties in North Carolina that had the majority of AIs belonging to the 7 state-recognized, non-federally recognized tribes. We collaborated with the tribe in each county and compared the incident cases of cancer in the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (NCCCR) to the tribal rolls. Data were analyzed to calculate what percent of names on both lists were not correctly identified as AI in the NCCCR. We corrected the NCCCR classification and calculated the percentage misclassified, then recalculated the cancer incidence rates for 4 major cancers (prostate, female breast, lung, and colorectal). We compared the recalculated rate to the original rate. RESULTS: There were 626 AIs on the tribal rolls; 112 (17.9%) were not identified as AI on the NCCCR list. Comparing 1996-2000 age-adjusted cancer incidence rates before and after reclassification, the increase in rates were prostate 41%, female breast 18%, lung 10%, and 11% for colorectal cancers. There was less than a 2% increase in cancer rates for the combined 4 sites for Blacks and Whites, before and after reclassification, and 19% for AIs. CONCLUSIONS: The study estimated 18% misclassification of non-federally recognized AIs in cancer registration in North Carolina, and determined an underestimation of cancer rates in the population. The underestimation of cancer burden among AIs in North Carolina may affect resources allocated for prevention, screening, and treatment programs, as well as funding for research.
BACKGROUND: Equitable distribution of health care resources relies on accurate morbidity and mortality data, classified by race. Accurate classification is a problem, particularly for non-federally recognized American Indians (AI) receiving care outside of the Indian Health Service. METHODS: We identified counties in North Carolina that had the majority of AIs belonging to the 7 state-recognized, non-federally recognized tribes. We collaborated with the tribe in each county and compared the incident cases of cancer in the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (NCCCR) to the tribal rolls. Data were analyzed to calculate what percent of names on both lists were not correctly identified as AI in the NCCCR. We corrected the NCCCR classification and calculated the percentage misclassified, then recalculated the cancer incidence rates for 4 major cancers (prostate, female breast, lung, and colorectal). We compared the recalculated rate to the original rate. RESULTS: There were 626 AIs on the tribal rolls; 112 (17.9%) were not identified as AI on the NCCCR list. Comparing 1996-2000 age-adjusted cancer incidence rates before and after reclassification, the increase in rates were prostate 41%, female breast 18%, lung 10%, and 11% for colorectal cancers. There was less than a 2% increase in cancer rates for the combined 4 sites for Blacks and Whites, before and after reclassification, and 19% for AIs. CONCLUSIONS: The study estimated 18% misclassification of non-federally recognized AIs in cancer registration in North Carolina, and determined an underestimation of cancer rates in the population. The underestimation of cancer burden among AIs in North Carolina may affect resources allocated for prevention, screening, and treatment programs, as well as funding for research.
Authors: Melissa A Jim; Elizabeth Arias; Dean S Seneca; Megan J Hoopes; Cheyenne C Jim; Norman J Johnson; Charles L Wiggins Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tyler M Dougherty; Amanda E Janitz; Mary B Williams; Sydney A Martinez; Michael T Peercy; David F Wharton; Julie Erb-Alvarez; Janis E Campbell Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2019 Sep/Oct
Authors: Melissa K Filippi; Aimee S James; Sarah Brokenleg; Myrietta Talawyma; David G Perdue; Won S Choi; K Allen Greiner; Christine M Daley Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2012-08-14
Authors: Sydney A Martinez; Amanda E Janitz; Julie Erb-Alvarez; Dana S Mowls; Janis E Campbell; Tom Anderson Journal: J Okla State Med Assoc Date: 2016 Jul-Aug
Authors: Janis E Campbell; Sydney A Martinez; Amanda E Janitz; Anne E Pate; Julie Erb-Alvarez; David F Wharton; David Gahn; Vicki L Tall; Cuyler Snider; Tom Anderson; Michael Peercy Journal: J Okla State Med Assoc Date: 2014-03
Authors: Melissa K Filippi; Stacy Braiuca; Lance Cully; Aimee S James; Won S Choi; K Allen Greiner; Christine M Daley Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Danielle R Gartner; Paul L Delamater; Robert A Hummer; Jennifer L Lund; Brian W Pence; Whitney R Robinson Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Dorothy A Rhoades; John Farley; Stephen M Schwartz; Kimberly M Malloy; Wenyu Wang; Lyle G Best; Ying Zhang; Tauqeer Ali; Fawn Yeh; Everett R Rhoades; Elisa Lee; Barbara V Howard Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.890