Literature DB >> 23796763

'Born in Michigan? You're in the biobank': engaging population biobank participants through Facebook advertisements.

J E Platt1, T Platt, D Thiel, S L R Kardia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite a broad call for biobanks to use social media, data is lacking regarding the capacity of social media tools, especially advertising, to engage large populations on this topic.
METHODS: We used Facebook advertising to engage Michigan residents about the BioTrust for Health. We conducted a low-budget (<USD 5,000), 26-day social media campaign targeting Michigan residents aged 18-28. We placed 25 Facebook advertisements and analyzed their performance in terms of reach and cost across 3 engagement types: passive, active and interactive. We compared engagement before, during and after the campaign.
RESULTS: The Facebook page was viewed 1,249 times during the month of the advertising campaign, versus once in the month prior. 779,004 Michigan residents saw ads an average of 25.8 times; 4,275 clicked ads; the average click-through-ratio was 0.021%. Interactions included 516 'likes' and 30 photo contest entries. Cost per outcome ranged from <USD 0.005 per exposure to USD 182 per photo entry. The average cost per click was USD 1.04.
CONCLUSION: A social media strategy to build public awareness about biobanking is not likely to be effective without a promotional 'push' to distribute content. Social media advertisements have the capacity to scale-up engagement on biobanking while keeping costs manageable. Facebook advertisements provide necessary access points for unaware participants, with implications for public trust.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23796763      PMCID: PMC4961047          DOI: 10.1159/000351451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  26 in total

1.  Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  "Broad" consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose.

Authors:  Carlo Petrini
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The Michigan BioTrust for Health: using dried bloodspots for research to benefit the community while respecting the individual.

Authors:  Denise Chrysler; Harry McGee; Janice Bach; Ed Goldman; Peter D Jacobson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  A randomized trial to assess the effect of a research informational pamphlet on telephone survey completion rates among older Latinos.

Authors:  Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Lisa Phan; Anita L Stewart; Celia Kaplan; Gina Moreno-John; Anna M Nápoles
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; Michael M Burgess; Kelly Edwards; Richard P Gallagher; Alice K Hawkins; Jane Kaye; Veronica McCaffrey; David E Winickoff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  The effects of priming on a public health campaign targeting cardiovascular risks.

Authors:  Mindy Ma; Katherine M Dollar; Jeffrey L Kibler; Daniel Sarpong; Deanne Samuels
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-09

Review 7.  From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.

Authors:  Jane Kaye; Liam Curren; Nick Anderson; Kelly Edwards; Stephanie M Fullerton; Nadja Kanellopoulou; David Lund; Daniel G MacArthur; Deborah Mascalzoni; James Shepherd; Patrick L Taylor; Sharon F Terry; Stefan F Winter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

Authors:  John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication.

Authors:  Wen-ying Sylvia Chou; Yvonne M Hunt; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.

Authors:  Jodyn Platt; Juli Bollinger; Rachel Dvoskin; Sharon L R Kardia; David Kaufman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  'Cool! and creepy': engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank.

Authors:  Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Daniel B Thiel; Nicole Fisher; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-12

2.  Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research.

Authors:  Daniel B Thiel; Jodyn Platt; Tevah Platt; Susan B King; Nicole Fisher; Robert Shelton; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Engaging a state: Facebook comments on a large population biobank.

Authors:  Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Daniel Thiel; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Community perspectives on public health biobanking: an analysis of community meetings on the Michigan BioTrust for Health.

Authors:  Daniel B Thiel; Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Susan B King; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-27

5.  Facebook Advertising Across an Engagement Spectrum: A Case Example for Public Health Communication.

Authors:  Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Daniel B Thiel; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-05-30

6.  Systematic Review on Information Technology Approaches to Evaluate the Impact of Public Health Campaigns: Real Cases and Possible Directions.

Authors:  Rafael Pinto; Lyrene Silva; Ricardo Valentim; Vivekanandan Kumar; Cristine Gusmão; Carlos Alberto Oliveira; Juciano Lacerda
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-11

7.  The impact of interactive advertising on consumer engagement, recall, and understanding: A scoping systematic review for informing regulatory science.

Authors:  Kristen Giombi; Catherine Viator; Juliana Hoover; Janice Tzeng; Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Brian G Southwell; Leila C Kahwati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.

Authors:  Jodyn Platt; Juli Bollinger; Rachel Dvoskin; Sharon L R Kardia; David Kaufman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.