Literature DB >> 23795798

Unaltered oncological outcomes of radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy over three decades.

Pascal Zehnder1, Urs E Studer, Eila C Skinner, George N Thalmann, Gus Miranda, Beat Roth, Jie Cai, Frédéric D Birkhäuser, Anirban P Mitra, Fiona C Burkhard, Ryan P Dorin, Siamak Daneshmand, Donald G Skinner, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate oncological outcome trends over the last three decades in patients after radical cystectomy (RC) and extended pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the University of Southern California (USC) RC cohort of patients (1488 patients) operated with intent to cure from 1980 to 2005 for biopsy confirmed muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. To focus on outcomes of unexpected (cN0M0) LN-positive patients, the USC subset was extended with unexpected LN-positive patients from the University of Berne (UB) (combined subgroup 521 patients). Patients were grouped and compared according to decade of surgery (1980-1989/1990-1999/≥2000). Survival probabilities were calculated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests compared outcomes according to decade of surgery, followed by multivariable verification.
RESULTS: The 10-year recurrence-free survival was 78-80% in patients with organ-confined, LN-negative disease, 53-60% in patients with extravesical, yet LN-negative disease and ≈30% in LN-positive patients. Although the number of patients receiving systemic chemotherapy increased, no survival improvement was noted in either the entire USC cohort, or in the combined LN-positive USC-UB cohort. In contrast, patient age at surgery increased progressively, suggesting a relative survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgery remains the mainstay of therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Yet, our study reveals predictable outcomes but no survival improvement in patients undergoing RC over the last three decades. Any future survival improvements are likely to result from more effective systemic treatments and/or earlier detection of the disease.
© 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795798     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  30 in total

1.  Propensity-matched analysis of stage-specific efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Felix V Chen; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Joshua S Jue; Mahmoud Alameddine; Devina J Dave; Sanoj Punnen; Dipen J Parekh; Chad R Ritch; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Molecular substratification of bladder cancer: moving towards individualized patient management.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-03-28

3.  Mitochondrial DNA Content as Risk Factor for Bladder Cancer and Its Association with Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Yuanqing Ye; Maosheng Huang; David W Chang; Ashish M Kamat; Xia Pu; Colin P Dinney; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 4.  Lymph node dissection in bladder cancer: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Cory M Hugen; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Population-based assessment of racial/ethnic differences in utilization of radical cystectomy for patients diagnosed with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Jinhai Huo; Christopher D Kosarek; Karim Chamie; Selwyn O Rogers; Michele A Williams; Sharon H Giordano; Simon P Kim; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Contemporary update on neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Nguyen; George N Thalmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Impact of psychiatric illness on decreased survival in elderly patients with bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Usama Jazzar; Shan Yong; Zachary Klaassen; Jinhai Huo; Byron D Hughes; Edgar Esparza; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Simon P Kim; Douglas S Tyler; Stephen J Freedland; Ashish M Kamat; Dwight V Wolf; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predictors of oncological outcomes in T1G3 patients treated with BCG who undergo radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Francesca Pisano; Paolo Gontero; J Palou; S Joniau; V Serretta; S Larré; S Di Stasi; B van Rhijn; J A Witjes; A Grotenhuis; R Colombo; A Briganti; M Babjuk; V Soukup; P U Malmstrom; J Irani; N Malats; J Baniel; R Mano; T Cai; E Cha; P Ardelt; J Varkarakis; R Bartoletti; G Dalbagni; S F Shariat; E Xylinas; R J Karnes; R Sylvester
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Nguyen; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Xian Wu; Padraic O'Malley; Igor M Inoyatov; Abimbola Ayangbesan; Bishoy M Faltas; Paul J Christos; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Radical cystectomy in patients with disseminated disease: An assessment of perioperative outcomes using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Christopher Wallis; Suneil Khana; Mohammad Hajiha; Robert K Nam; Raj Satkunasivam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.