Literature DB >> 26712616

Lymph node dissection in bladder cancer: Where do we stand?

Cory M Hugen1, Siamak Daneshmand2.   

Abstract

Radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the standard-of-care treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Lymphadenectomy is a central component of the operation because it continues to play both diagnostic and therapeutic roles. Routinely available preoperative imaging has limited diagnostic accuracy as it relies mostly on size to identify nodal metastasis increasing the value of lymphadenectomy. While the merits of lymphadenectomy are not in question, the extent of lymphadenectomy required to provide maximum benefit while limiting morbidity remains controversial. Furthermore, although robotic-assisted surgery has gained popularity in many centers, concern remains regarding the learning curve required and skill needed to replicate the quality of an open lymphadenectomy. Research efforts have been focused on these unresolved issues, and several trials are currently ongoing to help address these knowledge deficit areas. In this update, we will focus on the current state of lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer and highlight recent advances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Radical cystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712616     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1751-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  33 in total

1.  Variability in surgical quality in a phase III clinical trial of radical cystectomy in patients with organ-confined, node-negative urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Douglas A Mata; Susan Groshen; Friedrich-Carl Von Rundstedt; Donald G Skinner; Walter M Stadler; Richard J Cote; John P Stein; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Lymphadenectomy for invasive bladder cancer: I. historical perspective and contemporary rationale.

Authors:  John P Stein; Marcus L Quek; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Oncologic outcomes for lymph node-positive urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robot assisted radical cystectomy: with mean follow-up of 3.5 years.

Authors:  Chinedu O Mmeje; Rafael Nunez-Nateras; Matthew E Nielsen; Raj S Pruthi; Angela Smith; Eric M Wallen; Mitchell R Humphreys; Michael E Woods; Erik P Castle
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Prospective evaluation of MRI, ¹¹C-acetate PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for staging of bladder cancer.

Authors:  H A Vargas; O Akin; H Schöder; S Olgac; G Dalbagni; H Hricak; B H Bochner
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Lymph node dissection technique is more important than lymph node count in identifying nodal metastases in radical cystectomy patients: a comparative mapping study.

Authors:  Ryan P Dorin; Siamak Daneshmand; Manuel S Eisenberg; Shahin Chandrasoma; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Peter W Nichols; Donald G Skinner; Eila C Skinner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Variation in use of lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ryan C Hedgepeth; Yun Zhang; Ted A Skolarus; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Temporal trends in receipt of adequate lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer 1988 to 2010.

Authors:  Alexander P Cole; Deepansh Dalela; Julian Hanske; Stephanie A Mullane; Toni K Choueiri; Christian P Meyer; Paul L Nguyen; Mani Menon; Adam S Kibel; Mark A Preston; Joaquim Bellmunt; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  The impact of lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis on the outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Karl; Peter R Carroll; Jürgen E Gschwend; Ruth Knüchel; Francesco Montorsi; Christian G Stief; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.

Authors:  John P Stein; Jie Cai; Susan Groshen; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Long-term oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

Authors:  Syed Johar Raza; Timothy Wilson; James O Peabody; Peter Wiklund; Douglas S Scherr; Ali Al-Daghmin; Shiva Dibaj; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Alex Mottrie; Mani Menon; Bertram Yuh; Lee Richstone; Matthias Saar; Michael Stoeckle; Abolfazl Hosseini; Jihad Kaouk; James L Mohler; Koon-Ho Rha; Gregory Wilding; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  4 in total

1.  Lymph node dissection in urological cancers: one topic, many controversies.

Authors:  Avinash Nehra; R Jeffrey Karnes; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Risks and benefits of pelvic lymphadenectomy in octogenarians undergoing radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  M Grabbert; T Grimm; A Buchner; A Kretschmer; M Apfelbeck; G Schulz; F Jokisch; B-S Schneevoigt; C G Stief; A Karl
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Advances in surgical management of muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Janet Baack Kukreja; Jay B Shah
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  Editorial concerning "Pelvic lymph node dissection may be limited on the contralateral side in strictly unilateral bladder cancer without compromising oncological radicality".

Authors: 
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.