This account focuses on the application of ω-transaminases, lyases, and oxidases for the preparation of amines considering mainly work from our own lab. Examples are given to access α-chiral primary amines from the corresponding ketones as well as terminal amines from primary alcohols via a two-step biocascade. 2,6-Disubstituted piperidines, as examples for secondary amines, are prepared by biocatalytical regioselective asymmetric monoamination of designated diketones followed by spontaneous ring closure and a subsequent diastereoselective reduction step. Optically pure tert-amines such as berbines and N-methyl benzylisoquinolines are obtained by kinetic resolution via an enantioselective aerobic oxidative C-C bond formation.
This account focuses on the application of ω-transaminases, lyases, and oxidases for the preparation of amines considering mainly work from our own lab. Examples are given to access α-chiral primary amines from the corresponding ketones as well as terminal amines from primary alcohols via a two-step biocascade. 2,6-Disubstituted piperidines, as examples for secondary amines, are prepared by biocatalytical regioselective asymmetric monoamination of designated diketones followed by spontaneous ring closure and a subsequent diastereoselective reduction step. Optically pure tert-amines such as berbines and N-methyl benzylisoquinolines are obtained by kinetic resolution via an enantioselective aerobic oxidative C-C bond formation.
Biocatalysis, thus applying enzymes for
organic synthesis, has
become a vivid alternative for established organic methods.[1,2] Tailoring biocatalysts by protein engineering and design allows
to adapt the catalyst for the desired reaction conditions.[3] Several biocatalytic methods have been established
to access optically pure amines and derivates which play a pivotal
role as building blocks for pharmaceutical drugs, agrochemicals, natural
products, and as chiral ligands.[4] Whilst
originally mainly hydrolases were broadly applied for the preparation
of amines in optically pure form,[5] other
types of enzymes like ω-transaminases, lyases, and oxidases
came into focus for this purpose more recently. This account discusses
the application of these three types of enzymes for the preparation
of optically pure amines with special emphasis on the work performed
in our own laboratories. The account is divided into three main sections
according to the type of the obtained final product, namely primary-,
secondary-, and tertiary-amines.
Primary Amines
Within the past few years, the asymmetric synthesis of α-chiral prim-amines from the corresponding ketones was heavily investigated
by employing ω-transaminases (ωTAs).[6,7] The
asymmetric amination of the prochiral ketone is favored over the reverse
reaction, namely the kinetic resolution of racemic amines with these
enzymes.[8] ωTAs catalyze the reductive
amination of the substrate ketone using an aminedonor which serves
as nitrogen source and provides the required electrons, thereby the
aminedonor gets oxidized to the corresponding ketone (Scheme 1). The required cofactor pyridoxal 5′-phosphate
(PLP) acts thereby as electron and nitrogen shuttle and is added to
the reaction mixture in general at a concentration of 0.1 to 1 mM
for 50 mM substrate concentration.
Scheme 1
Asymmetric amination of ketones employing
ω-transaminases
Even though various amines can be applied as amine source,
2-propylamine
seems to be an ideal, achiral, and cheap reagent, as was recently
demonstrated on industrial scale for the preparation of the diabetes
type 2 drug sitagliptin (performed on a multikilogram scale with a
substrate concentration of ca. 200 g/L).[9] Nevertheless, even for this privileged product the oxidized aminedonor (acetone) had to be removed via gas flow at elevated temperature
(45 °C); alternatively, the formed acetone can be removed at
reduced pressure[10] or reduced to the corresponding
alcohol.[11] On the other hand, using alanine
as the aminedonor, the formed coproduct pyruvate is commonly removed
either by recycling it back to alanine[6d,12] or by reduction
to lactate.[12b] In the first case, an alanine
dehydrogenase (AlaDH) is required, while in the second one a lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) is employed. Because NAD(P)H is consumed in stoichiometric
amounts in both methods, established systems for NAD(P)H recycling
are employed (formate dehydrogenase, glucose dehydrogenase, phosphite
dehydrogenase). Notably, removal of the coproduct pyruvate is required
due to the nonfavored equilibrium of the amination reaction.[13d] In the case of using 2-propylamine in excess
as aminedonor (e.g., 10 equivalents), full conversion is not reached
in general, except for selected substrates, where the product amine
is thermodynamically favored.[9,10,14,15] Consequently, the approaches
employing LDH or AlaDH might be preferred for general substrates because
it allows full conversion; nevertheless, the search for ideal amine
donors is still ongoing.[16]Testing
various substrates and ωTAs,[17] the
(S)-enantiomer as well as the (R)-enantiomer of each amine was accessible in most cases in optically
pure form (>99% ee) at 50 mM substrate concentration
(Table 1). A number of ω-TAs turned out
to be rather useful in our own studies like the (S)-stereoselective ωTAs from Vibrio fluvialis (VF-ωTA),[18]Chromobacterium
violaceum (CV-ωTA),[19]Bacillus megaterium (BM-ωTA),[20]Paracoccus denitrificans (PD-ωTA),[21]Pseudomonas
fluorescens (PF-ωTA),[22]Alcaligenes denitrificans (AD-ωTA),[23] as well as a variant from Arthrobacter
citreus (ArS-ωTA).[24] (R)-Selective ωTAs of interest originated
from Aspergillus terreus (AT-ωTA),[25]Hyphomonas neptunium (HN-ωTA),[25]Arthrobacter sp. (ArR-ωTA)[26] as well as its
variant ArRmut11-ωTA.[9a] All enzymes
were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and employed in general as permeabilized (freeze-dried) cell preparation;
thus neither enzyme purification was not required nor cell disruption.
In most cases, the ratio of weight of substrate to freeze-dried whole
cell catalyst preparation was ∼1/2.
Table 1
Asymmetric
amination of various ketones
at 50 mM substrate concentration
Conversion was
measured by GC.
Conversion was
measured by GC.The applicability
of the ωTAs was shown in a short chemoenzymatic
synthesis of (S)-rivastigmine, which was prepared
within a linear sequence of three steps employing either PD-ωTA
or VF-ωTA in the asymmetric key step (45 mM substrate concentration;
100 mg scale) (Scheme 2).[27] The primary (S)-amine was obtained thereby
with perfect optical purity (>99% ee) and excellent
conversions (up to >99%), which was subsequently dimethylated to
a
tertiary amine by chemical means. (S)-Rivastigmine
is used for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s
disease and dementia due to Parkinson’s disease.
Scheme 2
Chemoenzymatic
asymmetric synthesis of (S)-rivastigmine
within three steps
3-Aryl-GABA (3-aryl γ-aminobutyric acid) derivatives[28] play an important role in several nervous system
functions. The precursor (4-phenylpyrrolidin-2-one) was prepared in
a dynamic kinetic resolution employing a ωTA on a 100 mg scale
giving the desired product with 92% isolated yield (Scheme 3).[29] Unfortunately, the
stereoselectivity of the employed ωTA (ATA-117, which is almost
identical to ArR-ωTA) led only to 68% ee in
this particular case. Nevertheless, the reported general synthetic
strategy allows obtaining optically enriched 4-arylpyrrolidin-2-one
within only three synthetic steps with 54% overall yield, which represents
a significant improvement compared to previous approaches.
Scheme 3
Dynamic
kinetic resolution of a racemic α-chiral aldehyde to
prepare a 3-phenyl-GABA precursor
For some cases, the racemic amine is easier to access
than the
corresponding prochiral ketone. Consequently, deracemization[30] of the racemic amine to yield the amine with
theoretically quantitative yield and >99% ee is
of
interest. For example, deracemization of the drug mexiletine (an orally
effective antiarrhythmic agent) was achieved by combining the reverse
reaction, namely the enantioselective deamination with the stereoselective
amination employing stereocomplementary enzymes up to a 100 mg scale
(Scheme 4).[31] The
deracemization was successfully performed in a one-pot two-step process.[32] By using appropriate enzymes, (R)- as well as (S)-mexiletine could be prepared in
optically pure form (>99% ee) and 97% isolated
yield.
For the deamination, pyruvate was recycled using an amine oxidase.[33] The efficiency of the process could be further
improved by immobilizing the ωTA of the first step by encapsulation
in a sol–gel/Celite matrix to remove it prior to the second
step.[34]
Scheme 4
Deracemization of rac-mexiletine via a two-step
procedure
Preparation of amines
in an aqueous environment at neutral pH turns
the isolation of the product amine cumbersome because it requires
additionally the adjustment of the pH to basic conditions prior to
extraction. Consequently, it would be desirable to perform the transformation
in an organic environment, similar to reactions with lipases and proteases
which are extensively employed in nonaqueous solvents.[35] A recent study suggested that ωTAs need
to be engineered and immobilized to be able to employ them in a purely
organic environment.[36] However, we found
that by employing an appropriate cell-free freeze-dried ωTA
preparation and by careful tuning the water activity, every ωTA,
as far as tested, can indeed be employed in organic solvents.[15] The solvents methyl t-butyl
ether (MTBE) and ethyl acetate (EtOAc)[37] turned out to be best suited. The maximum enzymatic activity was
found at the same water activity aw of
0.6 for both solvents, which corresponded to a water concentration cw of 2% v/v and 0.65% v/v in EtOAc and MTBE,
respectively. The ωTAs showed increased stability in organic
solvents compared to buffer; for instance, the enzyme was still active
after incubation in EtOAc for 24 h at 60 °C. In contrast, the
ωTA was completely inactive after 5 min of incubation in aqueous
buffer at the same temperature. Furthermore, all nine enzymes investigated
accepted efficiently 2-propylamine as aminedonor. As an example,
methoxy-acetone (50 mM) was quantitatively aminated to enantiopure
(R)-methoxy-2-propylamine in just two hours in MTBE
using 3 equiv of 2-propylamine as aminedonor (Scheme 5). Conversely, the amination in aqueous buffer at pH 7 afforded
just 30% conversion employing 3 equiv of 2-propylamine after one day.
Especially substrates carrying an oxygen atom in the vicinity of the
ketone moiety, enabling the formation of an internal hydrogen bond
between NH2 and O in the product amine, were aminated in
general with high conversion with just 3 equiv of amine. These products
are probably thermodynamically favored. Another important observation
was that no substrate inhibition was found in MTBE (aw 0.6) (up to 500 mM), while in aqueous buffer inhibition
occurred typically at 10 mM substrate concentration. Finally, because
the catalyst forms a solid phase, it could be easily separated by
filtration and recycled several times without loss of activity.
Scheme 5
Asymmetric bio-amination of ketones in MTBE at defined water activity aw = 0.6
In contrast to the amination of ketones, the direct amination
of
alcohols would not require any reducing agents in the ideal case due
to the same oxidation state of alcohol and amine, as already demonstrated
with metal catalysts via the “borrowing hydrogen” approach.[38] Because no enzyme is known, to the best of our
knowledge, which aminates an alcohol, we designed an artificial biocatalyst
cascade/network to accomplish this task (Scheme 6).[39] In the first step, the alcohol was
oxidized by an alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) consuming NAD+, leading to the formation of the aldehyde and NADH. In the second
sequential step, a ωTA aminated the intermediate aldehyde at
the expense of l-alanine. For the regeneration of l-alanine from pyruvate, a l-alanine dehydrogenase (AlaDH)
was employed, consuming ammonia and NADH. The latter was provided
from the oxidation step where NADH was liberated. Thus, the AlaDH
connected the oxidation with the reductive amination by transferring
the hydride from NADH, the byproduct of the oxidation, to the amination
step by regenerating the aminedonoralanine from pyruvate. Careful
optimization of temperature and cosolvent allowed the diamination
of 1,ω-alkanediols, leading to 99% conversion to the diamines.
For example, the diamination of 1,10-decanediol on preparative scale
(174 mg substrate) led to 94% conversion and 70% isolated yield. Alternatively,
the alcohol can be oxidized by employing an oxidase followed by amination
with a ωTA,[40] however, in this case,
additional redox reagents are required.
Scheme 6
Biocatalyst network
for the amination of alcohols in water
Conditions: water 10% v/v
1,2-dimethoxyethane, 0.35 mM PLP, pH 8.5, 25 °C, 20 h.
Biocatalyst network
for the amination of alcohols in water
Conditions: water 10% v/v
1,2-dimethoxyethane, 0.35 mM PLP, pH 8.5, 25 °C, 20 h.Other options employing oxidases or lyases to prepare
optically
pure primary amines established by other groups include (i) the deracemization
employing a monoamine oxidase (MAO)[41] and
an achiral reducing agent or (ii) via addition of ammonia to alkenes.
The deracemization employing MAO, will be described with examples
in the chapters below.The asymmetric addition of ammonia to
a C=C-double bond
is catalyzed by various lyases,[42] whereby
the addition of NH3 to unsaturated acids can be utilized
for the synthesis of chiral α-amino acids. For example, the
closely related methylaspartate and phenyl ammonium lyase (MAL and
PAL) are used on an industrial scale for production of amino acides
like l-phenyl alanine and l-aspartate on a multiton
scale since the 1980s. Furthermore, MAL has been coupled with an aspartate-4-decarboxylase
in a continuous process to yield l-alanine.[43] Whilst the substrate spectrum of the wild type MAL is narrow,
engineered methylaspartate ammonia lyase (MAL) accepted a broader
spectrum of nucleophiles beside ammonia[44] compared to its wild type.[45] A single
variant (Q73A) accepted various nucleophiles, including linear and
cyclic alkylamines, giving also access to secondary amines (Scheme 7) (see also chapter below).
Scheme 7
Ammonia lyases catalyze
the reversible addition of ammonia to α,β-unsaturated
acids
Secondary Amines
Because ωTAs have not been described so far to transfer any
substituted amine group to a ketone to yield the secondary amine directly,
we designed special substrates leading to amino ketones which spontaneously
cyclized to yield, after reduction, a cyclic secondary amine. The
interesting question was whether the ωTA will be capable of
discriminating between two ketone moieties within the same molecule.
Indeed, in transforming various 1,5-diketones, it was found that the
asymmetric reductive amination proceeds with perfect regio- as well
as with perfect stereoselectivity and high conversion at 50 mM substrate
concentration (Schemes 8 and 9). Exclusively the sterically less demanding (ω-1)-ketone-moiety
within each molecule of the investigated 1,5-diketones was aminated,
leading to spontaneous ring-closure to afford the optically pure Δ1-piperideine
(ee > 99%), which was diasteroselectively reduced
to the corresponding cis- and trans-piperidines, respectively.[46] Notably,
most of the investigated amino-transferases were able to discriminate
between very small differences in size (e.g., methyl vs cyclopropyl),
yielding one regioisomer in optically pure form.
Scheme 8
Chemoenzymatic synthesis
of optically pure cis-2,6-disubstituted
piperidines via regio- and stereoselective mono-amination of 1,5-diketones
yielding Δ1-piperideines followed by diastereoselective reduction
Scheme 9
Chemoenzymatic synthesis of all four
stereoisomers of the alkaloids
dihydropinidine and epi-dihydropinidine
Reaction conditions: (a) diketone
(78 mg, 0.5 mmol, 50 mM), CV-ωTA, PLP (1 mM), NAD+ (1 mM), l-alanine (10 equiv), NH4HCOO (150 mM),
11 U FDH, 12 U AlaDH; 26 h, 30 °C, 120 rpm; (b) analogue to (a)
but with ArR-ωTA and d-alanine; (c) Pd/C, H2, 4 h, 22 °C; (d) Et3Al in hexane (5.0 mmol), LiAlH4 in THF (2.5 mmol), THF, −78 °C, 2 h.
Chemoenzymatic synthesis of all four
stereoisomers of the alkaloids
dihydropinidine and epi-dihydropinidine
Reaction conditions: (a) diketone
(78 mg, 0.5 mmol, 50 mM), CV-ωTA, PLP (1 mM), NAD+ (1 mM), l-alanine (10 equiv), NH4HCOO (150 mM),
11 U FDH, 12 U AlaDH; 26 h, 30 °C, 120 rpm; (b) analogue to (a)
but with ArR-ωTA and d-alanine; (c) Pd/C, H2, 4 h, 22 °C; (d) Et3Al in hexane (5.0 mmol), LiAlH4 in THF (2.5 mmol), THF, −78 °C, 2 h.This strategy was employed for the shortest and highest
yielding
route to all four diastereomers of the natural alkaloidsdihydropinine
(cis) and epi-dihydropinidine (anti) (Scheme 9). Starting from nonane-2,6-dione,
which can be obtained within one chemical step from commercial compounds,
the (R)- and (S)-Δ1-piperideine,
respectively, were obtained under perfect regio- and enantiocontrol
at full conversion using enantiocomplementary ωTAs (50 mM substrate
concentraiton; 78 mg). The cis-isomers were obtained
via subsequent Pd/C catalyzed hydrogenation whereas the anti-isomers were prepared by reduction of a Lewis-acid-mediated conformationally
changed Δ1-piperideine.[47]Approaches
to sec-amines from other groups employing
oxidases and lyases include for instance the application of the already
mentioned monoamine oxidase (MAO) as well as lyases, such as the norcoclaurine
or strictosidine synthase. The norcoclaurine synthase (NCS) catalyses
an asymmetric Pictet–Spengler condensation[48] and is located at the beginning of the secondary metabolic
pathway of plants, yielding benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. It condenses
stereoselectively a tyrosine derived aldehyde with dopamine to give
(S)-norcoclaurine (Scheme 10).[49] Recently, the substrate tolerance
was shown to be rather broad, especially concerning the aldehyde[50] and preparative scale experiments with non-natural
substrates were demonstrated (up to 2.2 g product).[51] A related enzyme catalyzing a Pictet–Spengler reaction
is the strictosidine synthase, which seems to be more substrate specific
especially regarding the aldehyde.[52]
Scheme 10
Stereoselective enzymatic condensation of dopamine and 4-hydroxyphenyl
acetaldehyde to (S)-norcoclaurine
Reaction conditions taken
from ref (48).
Stereoselective enzymatic condensation of dopamine and 4-hydroxyphenyl
acetaldehyde to (S)-norcoclaurine
Reaction conditions taken
from ref (48).The MAO of Aspergillus niger (MAO-N)
was subjected to random mutagenesis to broaden the substrate specificity.
Variants were obtained which oxidized compounds such as rac-1-methyl-tetrahydroisquinoline, allowing its deracemization (Scheme 11),[53] as well as the
desymmetrization of meso-pyrrolidines.[54]
Scheme 11
Examples for the deracemization of a sec- and tert-amines employing the monoamine
oxidase from Aspergillus niger and
borohydride
Tertiary Amines
By employing a monoamine oxidase, tert-amines
like crispine A could also be successfully deracemized (Scheme 11).[55] In our group, a
completely different approach was applied to obtain optically pure tert-amines: in the asymmetric key step, an enzyme catalyzed
C–C bond was formed in an aerobic oxidative enantioselective
reaction by employing the berberine bridge enzyme (BBE) (Scheme 12). BBE transforms the natural substrate (S)-reticuline to (S)-scoulerine at the
expense of molecular oxygen.
Scheme 12
Enantioselective oxidative C–C
bond formation catalysed by
BBE at the expense of O2
BBE originating from California poppy (Eschscholzia
californica)[56] can efficiently
be expressed in Pichia pastoris.[57] Just recently, the mechanism was revised,[58] and it was found that BBE possesses a biocovalently
linked FAD.[59] We showed that BBE can be
employed in a kinetic resolution starting with racemic N-methyl 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzylisoquinolines, leading to the formation
of optically pure 9-hydroxy 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroprotoberbines as well
as remaining optically pure benzylisoquinolines (Scheme 13).[60] The enzyme accepts
modifications at the isoquinoline ring at position 6 and 7, allowing
there in either position various substituents such as methoxy, hydroxy,
or just hydrogen or a bridging methylendioxy functionality. Additionally,
the presence of a methoxy group in position 8 is tolerated.
Scheme 13
Racemic
substrates resolved in a kinetic resolution by BBE
Concerning modifications at the phenol moiety,
it was observed
that the hydroxyl group in position 3′ is essential to maintain
activity. To allow efficient transformation of the barely water-soluble
benzylisoquinolines at 50–65 mM substrate concentration, cosolvents
were required. The enzyme tolerated various organic solvents at remarkable
high concentrations. Optimum conditions were found in the presence
of 70% v/v toluene at pH 9 and 40 °C, allowing substrate concentrations
up to 20 g/L.[61] By employing these conditions,
various substrates were successfully transformed on a 500 mg scale.
For instance, this asymmetric key step enabled the first asymmetric
total synthesis of (S)-scoulerine, a sedative and
muscle-relaxing agent. For selected non-natural substrates, the formation
of a minor regioisomer side product was observed, namely the 11-hydroxy
berbines. The ratio of the main product to regioisomer can be influenced
by the organic solvent used as well as by the substitution pattern
at the aromatic isoquinoline part. Moreover, it was demonstrated that
by introducing a fluoro atom in 6′ position and therefore blocking
the C–C–bond forming position for the 11-hydroxy regioisomer,
the 9-hydroxy berbines were formed exclusively as the main product.[62]
Conclusion
Biocatalysis has become
a competitive method for asymmetric synthesis.
The here presented approaches to various α-chiral prim-amines, as well as α-chiral sec- and tert-amines, demonstrate the power of enzymes with respect
to outstanding stereoselectivities and mild reaction conditions. It
clearly shows that the potential of biocatalytic methods awaits its
exploitation.
Authors: Valentin Köhler; Kevin R Bailey; Anass Znabet; James Raftery; Madeleine Helliwell; Nicholas J Turner Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Maria S Humble; Karim E Cassimjee; Maria Håkansson; Yengo R Kimbung; Björn Walse; Vahak Abedi; Hans-Jürgen Federsel; Per Berglund; Derek T Logan Journal: FEBS J Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 5.542
Authors: Thomas C Nugent; Richard Vaughan Williams; Andrei Dragan; Alejandro Alvarado Méndez; Andrei V Iosub Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 2.883
Authors: Desiree Pressnitz; Eva-Maria Fischereder; Jakob Pletz; Christina Kofler; Lucas Hammerer; Katharina Hiebler; Horst Lechner; Nina Richter; Elisabeth Eger; Wolfgang Kroutil Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: D P Gavin; F J Reen; J Rocha-Martin; I Abreu-Castilla; D F Woods; A M Foley; P A Sánchez-Murcia; M Schwarz; P O'Neill; A R Maguire; F O'Gara Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 4.379