| Literature DB >> 23794760 |
Alexandra Tsatsaroni1, Grigoris Zoidis, Panagiotis Zoumpoulakis, Andrew Tsotinis, Martin C Taylor, John M Kelly, George Fytas.
Abstract
An explanation for the vast difference observed in the trypanocidal activity between the new secondary (N-methylated) hydroxamic acids 5 and 6, and their primary (nonmethylated) congeners 1a and 2, based on their E/Z conformational behaviour in DMSO, is presented.Entities:
Keywords: E/Z conformational behaviour; Lipophilic hydroxamic acid derivatives; Molecular modelling studies; NMR; Trypanocidal action
Year: 2013 PMID: 23794760 PMCID: PMC3661977 DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.03.128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tetrahedron Lett ISSN: 0040-4039 Impact factor: 2.415
Figure 1Structures of the hydroxamic acid derivatives 1a–e, 2, 3a–d, 4a and 4b and the structures of the new N-methyl hydroxamate analogues 5 and 6.
Activity of acetohydroxamic acids 1a, 2, 5 and 6 tested against cultured bloodstream-form T. brucei (pH = 7.4) (see Supplementary data)
| Compd | ||
|---|---|---|
| IC50 | IC90 | |
| 90 ± 16 (79 ± 6) | 155 ± 7 (148 ± 8) | |
| 17 ± 1 (18 ± 1) | 26 ± 3 (24 ± 1) | |
| 246 × 103 (106 × 103) | 523 × 103 (198 × 103) | |
| 37 × 103 (35 × 103) | 47 × 103 (45 × 103) | |
Concentrations required to inhibit growth of T. brucei by 50% and 90%, respectively. For the active compounds 1a and 2, IC50 and IC90 data are the mean of triplicate experiments ± SEM (standard error of the mean).
IC50 and IC90 data for the respective hydrochlorides are shown in parentheses.
Scheme 1Synthesis of the new N-methyl hydroxamate analogues 5 and 6.
Figure 2Downfield region of compounds 2 and 6 including proton assignments.
Figure 3Expansion of the 2D NOESY spectrum of compound 2.
Figure 4E (left) and Z (right) low energy conformations of bioactive compound 2.
Figure 5Relative energy versus coordinate plot from a systematic study of the CONH dihedral angle of the hydroxamate group.