Literature DB >> 31792609

Coding and prescription rates of osteoporosis are low among distal radius fracture patients in Japan.

Natsumi Saka1, Kyoko Nomura2,3, Hoichi Amano3,4, Kenichi Fujimoto3, Yoshinobu Watanabe1, Hirotaka Kawano1, Shinichi Tanihara5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify the coding and prescription rates for osteoporosis in distal radius fracture patients and to investigate the associated factors to help prevent subsequent osteoporotic fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2014-2015, among 294,374 eligible individuals (42% female) aged 50-75 years in a health insurance claims database, we identified 192 individuals (mean age: 59.8 years, 74% female), counted the coding of distal radius fracture (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10) code: S525, S526), and determined if the patient had been assigned the code for osteoporosis and been prescribed osteoporosis medications. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors related to each rate.
RESULTS: The osteoporosis coding rate and osteoporosis medication prescription rate were 17.2% (n = 33) and 10.9% (n = 21), respectively. Most codes were assigned ≤ 3 months after injury (88%) at the distal radius fracture treatment facilities (84.8%). Patients who were assigned the code for osteoporosis or treated with osteoporosis medications were older (p = 0.08, p = 0.02, respectively), female (p = 0.05, p = 0.06, respectively) and having comorbidity (p = 0.02, p = 0.07, respectively). After adjustment, being female and having comorbidity remained the independent factors for the assignment of the code for osteoporosis (OR: 3.30, 95%, CI: 1.08-10.07, OR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.24-6.12, respectively). No factor remained significant for the osteoporosis prescription. Active vitamin D analogues were most frequently prescribed medication (67%) followed by bisphosphonates (48%).
CONCLUSION: The overall coding and prescription rates for osteoporosis after distal radius fracture were low, which suggested that physician adherence to the osteoporosis guideline was low.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Distal radius fracture; Fragility fracture; Guideline; ICD-10 coding

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31792609     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-019-01067-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  26 in total

1.  Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M T Cuddihy; S E Gabriel; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity?

Authors:  K B Freedman; F S Kaplan; W B Bilker; B L Strom; R A Lowe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy's fracture clinic screening program.

Authors:  D E Beaton; S Dyer; D Jiang; R Sujic; M Slater; J E M Sale; E R Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Inadequate management for secondary fracture prevention in patients with distal radius fracture by trauma surgeons.

Authors:  T Baba; H Hagino; H Nonomiya; T Ikuta; E Shoda; A Mogami; T Sawaguchi; K Kaneko
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Nationwide Databases in Orthopaedic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Daniel D Bohl; Kern Singh; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Fracture of the distal forearm as a forecaster of subsequent hip fracture: a population-based cohort study with 24 years of follow-up.

Authors:  H Mallmin; S Ljunghall; I Persson; T Naessén; U B Krusemo; R Bergström
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Clinical effectiveness of bisphosphonates for the prevention of fragility fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean Sanderson; Marrissa Martyn-St James; John Stevens; Edward Goka; Ruth Wong; Fiona Campbell; Peter Selby; Neil Gittoes; Sarah Davis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The Number of Patients and Therapeutic Profile of Spinal Stenosis Using Health Insurance Claims in Japan.

Authors:  Izumi Kuboyama; Satoshi Toyokawa; Jun Tomio; Haruhiko Inada; Shinichi Tanihara; Yasuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis treatment after a fragility fracture in older adults: regional variation and determinants of use in Quebec.

Authors:  Alain Vanasse; Pierre Dagenais; Théophile Niyonsenga; Jean-Pierre Grégoire; Josiane Courteau; Abbas Hemiari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis--executive summary.

Authors:  Hajime Orimo; Toshitaka Nakamura; Takayuki Hosoi; Masayuki Iki; Kazuhiro Uenishi; Naoto Endo; Hiroaki Ohta; Masataka Shiraki; Toshitsugu Sugimoto; Takao Suzuki; Satoshi Soen; Yoshiki Nishizawa; Hiroshi Hagino; Masao Fukunaga; Saeko Fujiwara
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.