D E Beaton1,2, M Vidmar3, K B Pitzul4, R Sujic5, N K Rotondi5, E R Bogoch6,7, J E M Sale5,4, R Jain8, J Weldon8. 1. Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. beatond@smh.ca. 2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. beatond@smh.ca. 3. Analytics & Informatics: Access to Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. 6. Mobility Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
We evaluated the impact of a more intensive version of an existing post-fracture coordinator-based fracture prevention program and found that the addition of a full-risk assessment improved treatment rates. These findings provide additional support for more intensive programs aimed at reducing the risk of re-fractures. INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based guidelines support coordinator-based programs to improve post-fracture osteoporosis guideline uptake, with more intensive programs including bone mineral density (BMD) testing and/or treatment being associated with better patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a more intensive version (BMD "fast track") of an existing provincial coordinator-based program. METHODS: We compared two versions of the program that screened treatment naïve fragility fracture patients (>50 years). Cases came from the BMD fast track program that included full fracture risk assessment and communication of relevant guidelines to the primary care provider (PCP). Matched controls were selected from the usual care program matching according to age, sex, fracture type, and date. Two matching techniques were used: traditional (hard) matching (TM) and propensity score matching (PS). The outcomes were treatment initiation with bone sparing medication, BMD testing rate, and the rate of returning to discuss the test results with a PCP. RESULTS: The program improvements led to a significant improvement in treatment initiation within 6 months from 16 % (controls based on PS) or 21 % (controls based on TM) to 32 % (cases). Ninety percent of patients in the BMD fast track program returned to their PCP to discuss bone health in the cases versus 60 % of the controls (for TM and PS). BMD testing occurred in 96 % of cases compared to the 66 (TM) or 65 % (PS) of the matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a full-risk assessment to a coordinator-based program significantly improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening.
We evaluated the impact of a more intensive version of an existing post-fracture coordinator-based fracture prevention program and found that the addition of a full-risk assessment improved treatment rates. These findings provide additional support for more intensive programs aimed at reducing the risk of re-fractures. INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based guidelines support coordinator-based programs to improve post-fracture osteoporosis guideline uptake, with more intensive programs including bone mineral density (BMD) testing and/or treatment being associated with better patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a more intensive version (BMD "fast track") of an existing provincial coordinator-based program. METHODS: We compared two versions of the program that screened treatment naïve fragility fracturepatients (>50 years). Cases came from the BMD fast track program that included full fracture risk assessment and communication of relevant guidelines to the primary care provider (PCP). Matched controls were selected from the usual care program matching according to age, sex, fracture type, and date. Two matching techniques were used: traditional (hard) matching (TM) and propensity score matching (PS). The outcomes were treatment initiation with bone sparing medication, BMD testing rate, and the rate of returning to discuss the test results with a PCP. RESULTS: The program improvements led to a significant improvement in treatment initiation within 6 months from 16 % (controls based on PS) or 21 % (controls based on TM) to 32 % (cases). Ninety percent of patients in the BMD fast track program returned to their PCP to discuss bone health in the cases versus 60 % of the controls (for TM and PS). BMD testing occurred in 96 % of cases compared to the 66 (TM) or 65 % (PS) of the matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a full-risk assessment to a coordinator-based program significantly improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening.
Authors: Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-10-12 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Brian Lentle; Angela M Cheung; David A Hanley; William D Leslie; David Lyons; Alexandra Papaioannou; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; Anthony B Hodsman; Abida Sophina Jamal; Robert G Josse; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Suzanne Morin; Kerry Siminoski Journal: Can Assoc Radiol J Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Beate Sander; Victoria Elliot-Gibson; Dorcas E Beaton; Earl R Bogoch; Andreas Maetzel Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: R Sujic; D E Beaton; M Mamdani; S M Cadarette; J Luo; S Jaglal; J E M Sale; R Jain; E Bogoch Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: H Ansari; D E Beaton; R Sujic; N K Rotondi; J D Cullen; M Slater; J E M Sale; R Jain; E R Bogoch Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-09-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Norbert Suhm; Alexander Egger; Christoph Zech; Henrik Eckhardt; Mario Morgenstern; Simon Gratza Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 3.067