Literature DB >> 23224391

Results of cemented total shoulder replacement with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Patric Raiss1, Markus Schmitt, Thomas Bruckner, Philip Kasten, Guido Pape, Markus Loew, Felix Zeifang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of patients treated with a third-generation cemented total shoulder replacement and followed for at least ten years.
METHODS: The results of thirty-nine arthroplasties were analyzed clinically with use of the Constant score and on radiographs in two projections, with special regard to glenoid component loosening, at a mean of eleven years (range, ten to fifteen years) postoperatively.
RESULTS: The mean Constant score was 27 points (range, 11 to 54 points) preoperatively and 61 points (range, 21 to 86 points) postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Mean shoulder flexion increased from 84° (range, 40° to 150°) preoperatively to 133° (range, 40° to 180°) postoperatively; mean abduction, from 77° (range, 40° to 110°) to 123° (range, 40° to 180°); and mean external rotation, from 11° (range, -20° to 40°) to 35° (range, 0° to 60°). No humeral components but 36% of the glenoid components were radiographically loose at the time of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the glenoid component was 100% after thirteen years with revision as the end point, whereas survivorship with radiographic loosening as the end point was only 48% after thirteen years. We found no correlation between glenoid loosening on radiographs and clinical findings such as the Constant score. Cranial migration of the humerus was seen in 69% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: With the implants, cementation, and surgical technique utilized in this group of patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, radiographic loosening of the glenoid component and rotator cuff deficiency were very common at the ten to fifteen-year review. The follow-up was not long enough to fully identify the clinical sequelae of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224391     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  32 in total

1.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Prospective midterm results of a new convertible glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study.

Authors:  Petra Magosch; Sven Lichtenberg; Mark Tauber; Frank Martetschläger; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  [Glenoid replacement for omarthritis : indications, technique, results and new developments].

Authors:  M Pfahler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Short stem shoulder prosthesis : concept and first results].

Authors:  M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sebastian Coda; Gilles Walch; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Results of cementless humeral head resurfacing with cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Manuela Weiter; Boris Sowa; Felix Zeifang; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Return to sports and work after partial shoulder replacement surgery.

Authors:  M Bülhoff; B Sowa; T Bruckner; F Zeifang; P Rais
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Comparison of general versus isolated regional anesthesia in total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  David Y Ding; Siddharth A Mahure; Brent Mollon; Steven D Shamah; Joseph D Zuckerman; Young W Kwon
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21

10.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.