OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping using different b-value combinations for treatment evaluation after magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) of uterine fibroids. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with 67 uterine fibroids were treated with volumetric MR-HIFU. Pre-treatment and post-treatment images were obtained using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (CE-T1WI) and DWI using b = 0, 200, 400, 600, 800 s/mm(2). ADC maps were generated using subsets of b-values to investigate the effects of tissue ablation on water diffusion and perfusion in fibroids treated with MR-HIFU. Four combinations of b-values were used: (1) all b-values; (2) b = 0, 200 s/mm(2); (3) b = 400, 600, 800 s/mm(2); and (4) b = 0, 800 s/mm(2). RESULTS: Using the lowest b-values (0 and 200 s/mm(2)), the mean ADC value in the ablated tissue reduced significantly (p < 0.001) compared with baseline. Calculating the ADC value with the highest b-values (400, 600, 800 s/mm(2)), the ADC increased significantly (p < 0.001) post-treatment. ADC maps calculated with the lowest b-values resulted in the best visual agreement of non-perfused fibroid tissue detected on CE images. Other b-value combinations and normal myometrium showed no difference in ADC after MR-HIFU treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in contrast agent uptake within the ablated region on CE-T1WI was correlated to a significantly decreased ADC when b = 0 and 200 s/mm(2) were used. KEY POINTS: DWI could be useful for treatment evaluation after MR-HIFU of uterine fibroids. The ADC in fibroid tissue is influenced by the choice of b- values. Low b-values seem the best choice to emphasise perfusion effects after MR-HIFU.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping using different b-value combinations for treatment evaluation after magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) of uterine fibroids. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with 67 uterine fibroids were treated with volumetric MR-HIFU. Pre-treatment and post-treatment images were obtained using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (CE-T1WI) and DWI using b = 0, 200, 400, 600, 800 s/mm(2). ADC maps were generated using subsets of b-values to investigate the effects of tissue ablation on water diffusion and perfusion in fibroids treated with MR-HIFU. Four combinations of b-values were used: (1) all b-values; (2) b = 0, 200 s/mm(2); (3) b = 400, 600, 800 s/mm(2); and (4) b = 0, 800 s/mm(2). RESULTS: Using the lowest b-values (0 and 200 s/mm(2)), the mean ADC value in the ablated tissue reduced significantly (p < 0.001) compared with baseline. Calculating the ADC value with the highest b-values (400, 600, 800 s/mm(2)), the ADC increased significantly (p < 0.001) post-treatment. ADC maps calculated with the lowest b-values resulted in the best visual agreement of non-perfused fibroid tissue detected on CE images. Other b-value combinations and normal myometrium showed no difference in ADC after MR-HIFU treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in contrast agent uptake within the ablated region on CE-T1WI was correlated to a significantly decreased ADC when b = 0 and 200 s/mm(2) were used. KEY POINTS: DWI could be useful for treatment evaluation after MR-HIFU of uterine fibroids. The ADC in fibroid tissue is influenced by the choice of b- values. Low b-values seem the best choice to emphasise perfusion effects after MR-HIFU.
Authors: Charles Mougenot; Bruno Quesson; Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Philippe Lourenco de Oliveira; Sara Sprinkhuizen; Jean Palussière; Nicolas Grenier; Chrit T W Moonen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Elizabeth A Stewart; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Clare M C Tempany; Bradley J Quade; Yael Inbar; Tilman Ehrenstein; Asher Shushan; Jonathan T Hindley; Robert D Goldin; Matthias David; Miri Sklair; Jaron Rabinovici Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Stephen B Solomon; Theresa L Nicol; David Y Chan; Todd Fjield; Nathaniel Fried; Louis R Kavoussi Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Juan C Plata; Andrew B Holbrook; Michael Marx; Vasant Salgaonkar; Peter Jones; Aurea Pascal-Tenorio; Donna Bouley; Chris Diederich; Graham Sommer; Kim Butts Pauly Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Sharon L Giles; Jessica M Winfield; David J Collins; Ian Rivens; John Civale; Gail R Ter Haar; Nandita M deSouza Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2018-05-10