Literature DB >> 23792130

Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates?

Annerleim Walton Diaz1, Anthony N Hoang1, Baris Turkbey2, Cheng William Hong3, Hong Truong1, Todd Sterling1, Soroush Rais-Bahrami1, M Minhaj Siddiqui1, Lambros Stamatakis1, Srinivas Vourganti1, Jeffrey Nix1, Jennifer Logan1, Colette Harris1, Michael Weintraub1, Celene Chua1, Maria J Merino4, Peter Choyke2, Bradford J Wood3, Peter A Pinto5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with an enlarged prostate and suspicion of prostate cancer pose a diagnostic dilemma. The prostate cancer detection rate of systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is between 30% and 40%. For prostates greater than 40 cc this decreases to 30% or less. Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy has shown superior prostate cancer detection rates. We defined the detection rate of magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy in men with an enlarged prostate gland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy at our institution. Whole prostate volumes were calculated using magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions. Detection rates were analyzed with respect to age, prostate specific antigen and whole prostate volumes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess these parameters as independent predictors of prostate cancer detection.
RESULTS: We analyzed 649 patients with a mean±SD age of 61.8±7.9 years and a median prostate specific antigen of 6.65 ng/ml (IQR 4.35-11.0). Mean whole prostate volume was 58.7±34.3 cc. The overall detection rate of the magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion platform was 55%. For prostates less than 40 cc the detection rate was 71.1% compared to 57.5%, 46.9%, 46.9% 33.3%, 36.4% and 30.4% for glands 40 to 54.9, 55 to 69.9, 70 to 84.9, 85 to 99.9, 100 to 114.9 and 115 cc or greater, respectively (p<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed a significant inverse association of magnetic resonance imaging volume with prostate cancer detection, controlling for age and prostate specific antigen.
CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal ultrasound guided and fusion biopsy cancer detection rates decreased with increasing prostate volume. However, magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy had a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to that of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in the literature. Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy represents a promising solution for patients with suspicion of prostate cancer and an enlarged prostate.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPH; MP; MR; MR imaging; MRI; PCa; TRUS; US; WP; benign prostatic hyperplasia; magnetic resonance; magnetic resonance imaging; multiparametric; prostate; prostate cancer; prostatic hyperplasia; prostatic neoplasms; transrectal US; ultrasonography; ultrasound; whole prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23792130      PMCID: PMC6301077          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

Review 1.  MR/US Fusion Technology: What Makes It Tick?

Authors:  Srinivas Vourganti; Norman Starkweather; Andrij Wojtowycz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  From novice to expert: analyzing the learning curve for MRI-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  R Mager; M P Brandt; H Borgmann; K M Gust; A Haferkamp; M Kurosch
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Optimizing Patient Population for MP-MRI and Fusion Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Thomas P Frye; Peter A Pinto; Arvin K George
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Imaging and pathology findings after an initial negative MRI-US fusion-guided and 12-core extended sextant prostate biopsy session.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Anthony N Hoang; Barış Türkbey; Lambros Stamatakis; Sheng Xu; Hayet Amalou; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Jeffrey W Nix; Srinivas Vourganti; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Authors:  Akhil Muthigi; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Michael Kongnyuy; Richard Simon; Vanessa Moreno; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Spatial Tracking of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Locations: Moving Towards Effective Focal Partial Prostate Gland Ablation with Improved Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Steven Sidelsky; Shaan Setia; Srinivas Vourganti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Serkan Guneyli; Emily Ward; Stephen Thomas; Ambereen Nehal Yousuf; Igor Trilisky; Yahui Peng; Tatjana Antic; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 8.  Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Hayet Amalou; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Pingkun Yan; Jochen Kruecker; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Kinzya B Grant; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Arvin K George; Anna M Brown; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.