Literature DB >> 28233228

MR/US Fusion Technology: What Makes It Tick?

Srinivas Vourganti1, Norman Starkweather2, Andrij Wojtowycz2.   

Abstract

MR/US fusion biopsy has emerged as a significant refinement of traditional prostate cancer diagnostic techniques. Utilizing not only quantitative imaging suspicion information from mpMRI but also the spatial accuracy and three-dimensional localization allows such strategies to specifically sample areas of concern with the gland. As such, diagnostic certainty is markedly improved. In this manuscript, we aim to highlight the multidisciplinary approach (amongst urologists, radiologists, pathologists, imaging technologists, nursing staff, and patients) which is required to launch and maintain a successful prostate imaging program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; MR/US fusion biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28233228     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0671-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  29 in total

1.  Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates?

Authors:  Annerleim Walton Diaz; Anthony N Hoang; Baris Turkbey; Cheng William Hong; Hong Truong; Todd Sterling; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Lambros Stamatakis; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; Jennifer Logan; Colette Harris; Michael Weintraub; Celene Chua; Maria J Merino; Peter Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Asim Afaq; Debra Goldman; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results.

Authors:  Simon R J Bott; Alastair Henderson; James E Halls; Bruce S I Montgomery; Robert Laing; Stephen E M Langley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Nix; Baris Turkbey; Anthony Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin Yerram; Celene Chua; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  Current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography fusion software platforms for guidance of prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Jennifer K Logan; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Andrew Gomella; Hayet Amalou; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence.

Authors:  Gabriel P Haas; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Richard F Jones; Vishal Chandan; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Mary Jumbelic; Gregory Threatte; Rus Korets; Hans Lilja; Gustavo de la Roza
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  MR imaging of the prostate and adjacent anatomic structures before, during, and after ejaculation: qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Steffen Sammet; Ambereen Yousuf; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer Is More Frequently Detected by Multiparametric MRI Targeted Biopsy Compared With Standard Biopsy.

Authors:  Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value.

Authors:  Ely R Felker; Jason Wu; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Steven S Raman; Jiaoti Huang; Fred Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Versus Transperineal Mapping Prostate Biopsy: Complication Comparison.

Authors:  Vassilios M Skouteris; E David Crawford; Vladimir Mouraviev; Paul Arangua; Marios Panagiotis Metsinis; Michael Skouteris; George Zacharopoulos; Nelson N Stone
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

2.  Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rachael L Sherrer; Zachary A Glaser; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; Kristin K Porter; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.554

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.