OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive imaging plays critical roles in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis or other risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. In recognition of the critical roles played by imaging, numerous international scientific organizations and societies have, in the past 12 years, proposed diagnostic systems for the interpretation of liver imaging examinations performed of at-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Although these imaging-based diagnostic systems represent important advances, they have limitations and they are not perfectly consistent with each other. The limitations and inconsistencies potentially cause confusion and may impair the integration of the systems into clinical practice as well as their utilization in research studies. The purpose of this article is to synthesize and critically appraise the current published imaging-based diagnostic systems endorsed by major societies for the noninvasive diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma and to propose future directions that we hope may be helpful in further advancing the field.
OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive imaging plays critical roles in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis or other risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. In recognition of the critical roles played by imaging, numerous international scientific organizations and societies have, in the past 12 years, proposed diagnostic systems for the interpretation of liver imaging examinations performed of at-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Although these imaging-based diagnostic systems represent important advances, they have limitations and they are not perfectly consistent with each other. The limitations and inconsistencies potentially cause confusion and may impair the integration of the systems into clinical practice as well as their utilization in research studies. The purpose of this article is to synthesize and critically appraise the current published imaging-based diagnostic systems endorsed by major societies for the noninvasive diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma and to propose future directions that we hope may be helpful in further advancing the field.
Authors: Sun Kyung Jeon; Ijin Joo; Dong Ho Lee; Sang Min Lee; Hyo-Jin Kang; Kyoung-Bun Lee; Jeong Min Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Robert M Hicks; Judy Yee; Michael A Ohliger; Stefanie Weinstein; Jeffrey Kao; Nabia S Ikram; Thomas A Hope Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Andrea Esposito; Valentina Buscarino; Dario Raciti; Elena Casiraghi; Matteo Manini; Pietro Biondetti; Laura Forzenigo Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2019-10-05 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: An Tang; Karma Abukasm; Guilherme Moura Cunha; Bin Song; Jin Wang; Mathilde Wagner; Christoph F Dietrich; Giuseppe Brancatelli; Kazuhiko Ueda; Jin-Young Choi; Diego Aguirre; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-01
Authors: Nabia S Ikram; Judy Yee; Stefanie Weinstein; Benjamin M Yeh; Carlos U Corvera; Alexander Monto; Thomas A Hope Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2017-03
Authors: Gerd Grözinger; Michael Bitzer; Roland Syha; Dominik Ketelsen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Ulrich Lauer; Marius Horger Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2016-07-28
Authors: Hina Arif-Tiwari; Bobby Kalb; Surya Chundru; Puneet Sharma; James Costello; Rainner W Guessner; Diego R Martin Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Michael T Corwin; Irene Cruite; Christoph F Dietrich; Richard K G Do; Eric C Ehman; Kathryn J Fowler; Hero K Hussain; Reena C Jha; Adib R Karam; Adrija Mamidipalli; Robert M Marks; Donald G Mitchell; Tara A Morgan; Michael A Ohliger; Amol Shah; Kim-Nhien Vu; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 11.105