Sun Kyung Jeon1,2, Ijin Joo3,4, Dong Ho Lee1,2, Sang Min Lee5, Hyo-Jin Kang1,2, Kyoung-Bun Lee6, Jeong Min Lee1,2,7. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. hijijin@gmail.com. 4. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. hijijin@gmail.com. 5. Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea. 6. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 7. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 for combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) in the differential diagnosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and prediction of prognosis on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI). METHODS: Patients at high risk of HCC with pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCAs (n = 70) and a matched control of HCCs (n = 70) who had undergone Gd-EOB-MRI were included. LI-RADS category was assigned for each lesion by two radiologists. Imaging features and surgical outcomes were compared between cHCC-CCAs of LR-M and LR-5/4 using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: cHCC-CCAs and HCCs were categorised as LR-M, LR-5/4 and LR-TIV in 61.4% (43/70), 37.1% (26/70) and 1.4% (1/70) and 10.0% (7/70), 88.6% (62/70) and 1.4% (1/70), respectively. cHCC-CCAs of LR-5/4, in comparison to LR-M, showed significantly higher frequencies of major HCC features: arterial hyperenhancement (96.2% (25/26) vs. 58.1% (25/43), p = 0.001), washout appearance (80.8% (21/26) vs. 48.8% (21/43), p = 0.011) and enhancing capsule (34.6% (9/26) vs. 11.6% (5/43), p = 0.031). After curative surgery, patients with cHCC-CCAs of LR-M showed a higher early recurrence rate (≤ 6 months) than did those with LR-5/4 (27.8% (10/36) vs. 4.8% (1/21), p = 0.041), whereas no significant difference was observed in RFS (log-rank p = 0.084). CONCLUSIONS: By using LI-RADS on Gd-EOB-MRI, a substantial proportion of cHCC-CCAs can be categorised as non-LR-M. In addition, cHCC-CCAs mimicking HCCs on imaging (LR-5/4) may indicate better surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those of LR-M. KEY POINTS: • cHCC-CCAs can be categorised as either LR-M or non-LR-M on Gd-EOB-MRI. • cHCC-CCAs of LR-5/4 frequently demonstrate major HCC imaging features. • LI-RADS categorisation may provide prognostic information after surgery in cHCC-CCAs.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 for combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) in the differential diagnosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and prediction of prognosis on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI). METHODS:Patients at high risk of HCC with pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCAs (n = 70) and a matched control of HCCs (n = 70) who had undergone Gd-EOB-MRI were included. LI-RADS category was assigned for each lesion by two radiologists. Imaging features and surgical outcomes were compared between cHCC-CCAs of LR-M and LR-5/4 using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: cHCC-CCAs and HCCs were categorised as LR-M, LR-5/4 and LR-TIV in 61.4% (43/70), 37.1% (26/70) and 1.4% (1/70) and 10.0% (7/70), 88.6% (62/70) and 1.4% (1/70), respectively. cHCC-CCAs of LR-5/4, in comparison to LR-M, showed significantly higher frequencies of major HCC features: arterial hyperenhancement (96.2% (25/26) vs. 58.1% (25/43), p = 0.001), washout appearance (80.8% (21/26) vs. 48.8% (21/43), p = 0.011) and enhancing capsule (34.6% (9/26) vs. 11.6% (5/43), p = 0.031). After curative surgery, patients with cHCC-CCAs of LR-M showed a higher early recurrence rate (≤ 6 months) than did those with LR-5/4 (27.8% (10/36) vs. 4.8% (1/21), p = 0.041), whereas no significant difference was observed in RFS (log-rank p = 0.084). CONCLUSIONS: By using LI-RADS on Gd-EOB-MRI, a substantial proportion of cHCC-CCAs can be categorised as non-LR-M. In addition, cHCC-CCAs mimicking HCCs on imaging (LR-5/4) may indicate better surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those of LR-M. KEY POINTS: • cHCC-CCAs can be categorised as either LR-M or non-LR-M on Gd-EOB-MRI. • cHCC-CCAs of LR-5/4 frequently demonstrate major HCC imaging features. • LI-RADS categorisation may provide prognostic information after surgery in cHCC-CCAs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; Liver neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: G Sapisochin; C Rodríguez de Lope; M Gastaca; J Ortiz de Urbina; R López-Andujar; F Palacios; E Ramos; J Fabregat; J F Castroagudín; E Varo; J A Pons; P Parrilla; M L González-Diéguez; M Rodriguez; A Otero; M A Vazquez; G Zozaya; J I Herrero; G Sanchez Antolin; B Perez; R Ciria; S Rufian; Y Fundora; J A Ferron; A Guiberteau; G Blanco; M A Varona; M A Barrera; M A Suarez; J Santoyo; J Bruix; R Charco Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kathryn J Fowler; Arman Sheybani; Rex A Parker; Sean Doherty; Elizabeth M Brunt; William C Chapman; Christine O Menias Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Daniel R Ludwig; Tyler J Fraum; Roberto Cannella; David H Ballard; Richard Tsai; Muhammad Naeem; Maverick LeBlanc; Amber Salter; Allan Tsung; Anup S Shetty; Amir A Borhani; Alessandro Furlan; Kathryn J Fowler Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2019-06
Authors: Tyler J Fraum; Roberto Cannella; Daniel R Ludwig; Richard Tsai; Muhammad Naeem; Maverick LeBlanc; Amber Salter; Allan Tsung; Anup S Shetty; Amir A Borhani; Alessandro Furlan; Kathryn J Fowler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 5.315