Robert M Hicks1, Judy Yee2, Michael A Ohliger3, Stefanie Weinstein2, Jeffrey Kao2, Nabia S Ikram2, Thomas A Hope4. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: Thomas.hope@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) imaging of the liver in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in reference to the LI-RADS classification system. METHODS: MR images of 40 patients with 68 LI-RADS grade 3-5 lesions were analyzed. Two readers independently reviewed sequences and characterized lesion signal intensity, followed by consensus evaluation. CE-MRI served as reference standard. Sensitivities were compared across sequences. Lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test across sequences and the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test between LI-RADS categories. Inter-reader variability was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS: Consensus sensitivities of LI-RADS 3-5 lesions using SSFSE images versus DWI were similar (0.53-0.63, p=0.089), however, the sensitivity with DWI b=700 was higher (0.63) than DWI b=0 (0.53, p=0.039). Lesion-to-liver CNRs were larger for all DWI sequences compared to SSFSE images (p<0.001 for all). ADCs of large (>2cm) LIRADS 3-5 lesions were lower than those of small lesions (1.09±0.33 vs. 1.31±0.26, p=0.02), however lesion ADCs were not different from those of adjacent hepatic parenchyma for any LI-RADS lesion. CONCLUSIONS: DWI has a similar sensitivity compared to SSFSE, but intensity on DWI likely represents intrinsic T2 signal hyper-intensity rather than restricted diffusion as the ADC values were not lower than adjacent parenchyma. Therefore it may not be appropriate to consider hyper-intensity on high b-value as a separate ancillary criteria to T2 hyper-intensity in LI-RADS. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) imaging of the liver in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in reference to the LI-RADS classification system. METHODS: MR images of 40 patients with 68 LI-RADS grade 3-5 lesions were analyzed. Two readers independently reviewed sequences and characterized lesion signal intensity, followed by consensus evaluation. CE-MRI served as reference standard. Sensitivities were compared across sequences. Lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test across sequences and the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test between LI-RADS categories. Inter-reader variability was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS: Consensus sensitivities of LI-RADS 3-5 lesions using SSFSE images versus DWI were similar (0.53-0.63, p=0.089), however, the sensitivity with DWI b=700 was higher (0.63) than DWI b=0 (0.53, p=0.039). Lesion-to-liver CNRs were larger for all DWI sequences compared to SSFSE images (p<0.001 for all). ADCs of large (>2cm) LIRADS 3-5 lesions were lower than those of small lesions (1.09±0.33 vs. 1.31±0.26, p=0.02), however lesion ADCs were not different from those of adjacent hepatic parenchyma for any LI-RADS lesion. CONCLUSIONS: DWI has a similar sensitivity compared to SSFSE, but intensity on DWI likely represents intrinsic T2 signal hyper-intensity rather than restricted diffusion as the ADC values were not lower than adjacent parenchyma. Therefore it may not be appropriate to consider hyper-intensity on high b-value as a separate ancillary criteria to T2 hyper-intensity in LI-RADS. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Shahid M Hussain; Jan De Becker; Wim C J Hop; Soendersing Dwarkasing; Piotr A Wielopolski Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Frank H Miller; Nancy Hammond; Aheed J Siddiqi; Sagar Shroff; Gaurav Khatri; Yi Wang; Laura B Merrick; Paul Nikolaidis Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tejas Parikh; Stephen J Drew; Vivian S Lee; Samson Wong; Elizabeth M Hecht; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gehad Ahmad Saleh; Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Lamiaa Galal El-Serougy; Walaa Shabana; Rihame Abd El-Wahab Journal: Pol J Radiol Date: 2022-01-17