Literature DB >> 32976878

The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.

Jeho Jeong1, Vicki T Taasti2, Andrew Jackson2, Joseph O Deasy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is recognized as an effective alternative treatment modality for early stage lung cancer, but a quantitative understanding of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) compared to photon therapy is lacking. In this work, a mechanistic tumor response model previously validated for lung photon radiotherapy was used to estimate the RBE of CIRT compared to photon radiotherapy, as a function of dose and the fractionation schedule.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical outcome data of 9 patient cohorts (394 patients) treated with CIRT for early stage lung cancer, representing all published data, were included. Fractional dose, number of fractions, treatment schedule, and local control rates were used for model simulations relative to standard photon outcomes. Four parameters were fitted: α, α/β, and the oxygen enhancement ratios of cells either accessing only glucose, not oxygen (OERI), or cells dying from starvation (OERH). The resulting dose-response relationship of CIRT was compared with the previously determined dose-response relationship of photon radiotherapy for lung cancer, and an RBE of CIRT was derived.
RESULTS: Best-fit CIRT parameters were: α = 1.12 Gy-1 [95%-CI: 0.97-1.26], α/β = 23.9 Gy [95%-CI: 8.9-38.9], and the oxygen induced radioresistance of hypoxic cell populations were characterized by OERI = 1.08 [95%-CI: 1.00-1.41] (cells lacking oxygen but not glucose), and OERH = 1.01 [95%-CI: 1.00-1.44] (cells lacking oxygen and glucose). Depending on dose and fractionation, the derived RBE ranges from 2.1 to 1.5, with decreasing values for larger fractional dose and fewer number of fractions.
CONCLUSION: Fitted radiobiological parameters were consistent with known carbon in vitro radiobiology, and the resulting dose-response curve well-fitted the reported data over a wide range of dose-fractionation schemes. The same model, with only a few fitted parameters of clear mechanistic meaning, thus synthesizes both photon radiotherapy and CIRT clinical experience with early stage lung tumors.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT); Early stage lung cancer; Radiobiological mechanism; Relative biological effectiveness (RBE); Tumor response model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32976878      PMCID: PMC7770609          DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  49 in total

1.  Relative biological effectiveness for cell-killing effect on various human cell lines irradiated with heavy-ion medical accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) carbon-ion beams.

Authors:  M Suzuki; Y Kase; H Yamaguchi; T Kanai; K Ando
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The inactivation of Chinese hamster cells by x rays: synchronized and exponential cell populations.

Authors:  C J Gillespie; J D Chapman; A P Reuvers; D L Dugle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP model parameters for radiation pneumonitis and xerostomia based on combined analysis of published clinical data.

Authors:  V A Semenenko; X A Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Examination of GyE system for HIMAC carbon therapy.

Authors:  Tatsuaki Kanai; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Tadaaki Miyamoto; Junetsu Mizoe; Tadashi Kamada; Hiroshi Tsuji; Hirotoshi Kato; Masayuki Baba; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The relationship between growth rate, labelling index and histological type of human solid tumours.

Authors:  E P Malaise; N Chavaudra; M Tubiana
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Carbon-ion beam irradiation effectively suppresses migration and invasion of human non-small-cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Yuichi Akino; Teruki Teshima; Ayaka Kihara; Yuko Kodera-Suzumoto; Miho Inaoka; Shigeki Higashiyama; Yoshiya Furusawa; Nariaki Matsuura
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Specification of Carbon Ion Dose at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS).

Authors:  Naruhiro Matsufuji; Tatsuaki Kanai; Nobuyuki Kanematsu; Tadaaki Miyamoto; Masayuki Baba; Tadashi Kamada; Hirotoshi Kato; Shigeru Yamada; Jun-Etsu Mizoe; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Comparison of the Methods of Specifying Carbon Ion Doses at NIRS and GSI.

Authors:  John Gueulette; André Wambersie
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 9.  RBE and related modeling in carbon-ion therapy.

Authors:  Christian P Karger; Peter Peschke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The Emerging Role of Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel K Ebner; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Carbon Ion Radiobiology.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Application of Carbon Ion and Its Sensitizing Agent in Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wang; Xiaojun Chen; Guangfei Li; Xiao Han; Tianxin Gao; Weifeng Liu; Xiaoying Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.