BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of using high schools for conducting school-based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs for adolescent substance misuse, there have been very few studies of Brief Interventions (BIs) in these settings. OBJECTIVES: This multi-site, repeated measures study examined outcomes of adolescents who received SBIRT services and compared the extent of change in substance use based on the intensity of intervention received. METHODS: Participants consisted of 629 adolescents, ages 14-17, who received SBIRT services across 13 participating high schools in New Mexico. The level of service received and number of sessions were collected through administrative records, while the number of self-reported days in the past month of drinking; drinking to intoxication; and drug use were gathered at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: BI was provided to 85.1% of adolescents, while 14.9% received brief treatment or referral to treatment (BT/RT). Participants receiving any intervention reported significant reductions in frequency of drinking to intoxication (p < .05) and drug use (p < .001), but not alcohol use, from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The magnitude of these reductions did not differ based on service variables. Controlling for baseline frequency of use, a BT/RT service level was associated with more days of drinking at 6-month follow-up (p < .05), but was no longer significant when controlling for number of service sessions received. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support school-based SBIRT for adolescents, but more research is needed on this promising approach.
BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of using high schools for conducting school-based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs for adolescent substance misuse, there have been very few studies of Brief Interventions (BIs) in these settings. OBJECTIVES: This multi-site, repeated measures study examined outcomes of adolescents who received SBIRT services and compared the extent of change in substance use based on the intensity of intervention received. METHODS:Participants consisted of 629 adolescents, ages 14-17, who received SBIRT services across 13 participating high schools in New Mexico. The level of service received and number of sessions were collected through administrative records, while the number of self-reported days in the past month of drinking; drinking to intoxication; and drug use were gathered at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS:BI was provided to 85.1% of adolescents, while 14.9% received brief treatment or referral to treatment (BT/RT). Participants receiving any intervention reported significant reductions in frequency of drinking to intoxication (p < .05) and drug use (p < .001), but not alcohol use, from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The magnitude of these reductions did not differ based on service variables. Controlling for baseline frequency of use, a BT/RT service level was associated with more days of drinking at 6-month follow-up (p < .05), but was no longer significant when controlling for number of service sessions received. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support school-based SBIRT for adolescents, but more research is needed on this promising approach.
Authors: Jerry L Grenard; Susan L Ames; Reinout W Wiers; Carolien Thush; Alan W Stacy; Steve Sussman Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Ronald F Maio; Jean T Shope; Frederic C Blow; Mary Ann Gregor; Jennifer S Zakrajsek; James E Weber; Michele M Nypaver Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: John Marsden; Garry Stillwell; Helen Barlow; Annabel Boys; Colin Taylor; Neil Hunt; Michael Farrell Journal: Addiction Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: E F S Kaner; F Beyer; H O Dickinson; E Pienaar; F Campbell; C Schlesinger; N Heather; J Saunders; B Burnand Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2007-04-18
Authors: Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Robert P Schwartz; Arethusa S Kirk; Kristi Dusek; Marla Oros; Colleen Hosler; Jan Gryczynski; Carolina Barbosa; Laura Dunlap; David Lounsbury; Kevin E O'Grady; Barry S Brown Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2015-06-26
Authors: Lillian Gelberg; Ronald M Andersen; Melvin W Rico; Mani Vahidi; Guillermina Natera Rey; Steve Shoptaw; Barbara D Leake; Martin Serota; Kyle Singleton; Sebastian E Baumeister Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jordan M Braciszewski; Golfo K Tzilos Wernette; Roland S Moore; Tanya B Tran; Beth C Bock; Robert L Stout; Patricia Chamberlain; Adam Vose-O'Neal Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2018-03
Authors: Jonathan G Tubman; Alan Meca; Seth J Schwartz; Maria Rosa Velazquez; Andrew W Egbert; Mary H Soares; Timothy Regan Journal: J Sch Nurs Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Roy Wade; Brandon D Becker; Katherine B Bevans; Derek C Ford; Christopher B Forrest Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jordan M Braciszewski; Golfo K Tzilos Wernette; Roland S Moore; Beth C Bock; Robert L Stout; Patricia Chamberlain Journal: Child Youth Serv Rev Date: 2018-08-15
Authors: Robert P Schwartz; Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Arturo Gonzales; Ana Moseley; Thomas R Peterson; Steven J Ondersma; Kevin E O'Grady Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: William Theodore Robison; Mary T Soares; Alan Meca; Jennifer Jean-Jacques; Jonathan G Tubman; Seth J Schwartz Journal: Health Behav Policy Rev Date: 2019-11-01