Roy Wade1, Brandon D Becker2, Katherine B Bevans3, Derek C Ford4, Christopher B Forrest3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: wader2@email.chop.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Clinicians require tools to rapidly identify individuals with significant childhood adversity as part of routine primary care. The goal of this study was to shorten the 11-item Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) measure and evaluate the feasibility and validity of this shortened measure as a screener to identify adults who have experienced significant childhood adversity. METHODS: Statistical analysis was conducted in 2015. ACE item responses obtained from 2011-2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were combined to form a sample of 71,413 adults aged ≥18 years. The 11-item Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ACE measure was subsequently reduced to a two-item screener by maintaining the two dimensions of abuse and household stressors and selecting the most prevalent item within each dimension. RESULTS: The screener included household alcohol and childhood emotional abuse items. Overall, 42% of respondents and at least 75% of the individuals with four or more ACEs endorsed one or both of these experiences. Using the 11-item ACE measure as the standard, a cut off of one or more ACEs yielded a sensitivity of 99%, but specificity was low (66%). Specificity improved to 94% when using a cut off of two ACEs, but sensitivity diminished (70%). There was no substantive difference between the 11-and two-item ACE measures in their strength of association with an array of health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A two-item ACE screener appropriate for rapid identification of adults who have experienced significant childhood adversity was developed.
INTRODUCTION: Clinicians require tools to rapidly identify individuals with significant childhood adversity as part of routine primary care. The goal of this study was to shorten the 11-item Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) measure and evaluate the feasibility and validity of this shortened measure as a screener to identify adults who have experienced significant childhood adversity. METHODS: Statistical analysis was conducted in 2015. ACE item responses obtained from 2011-2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data were combined to form a sample of 71,413 adults aged ≥18 years. The 11-item Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ACE measure was subsequently reduced to a two-item screener by maintaining the two dimensions of abuse and household stressors and selecting the most prevalent item within each dimension. RESULTS: The screener included household alcohol and childhood emotional abuse items. Overall, 42% of respondents and at least 75% of the individuals with four or more ACEs endorsed one or both of these experiences. Using the 11-item ACE measure as the standard, a cut off of one or more ACEs yielded a sensitivity of 99%, but specificity was low (66%). Specificity improved to 94% when using a cut off of two ACEs, but sensitivity diminished (70%). There was no substantive difference between the 11-and two-item ACE measures in their strength of association with an array of health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A two-item ACE screener appropriate for rapid identification of adults who have experienced significant childhood adversity was developed.
Authors: Maxia Dong; Robert F Anda; Vincent J Felitti; Shanta R Dube; David F Williamson; Theodore J Thompson; Clifton M Loo; Wayne H Giles Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2004-07
Authors: Laura P Richardson; Carol Rockhill; Joan E Russo; David C Grossman; Julie Richards; Carolyn McCarty; Elizabeth McCauley; Wayne Katon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dawn B Mautner; Hauchie Pang; Jeffrey C Brenner; Judy A Shea; Kennen S Gross; Rosemary Frasso; Carolyn C Cannuscio Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Robert F Anda; David W Brown; Shanta R Dube; J Douglas Bremner; Vincent J Felitti; Wayne H Giles Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Stephanie A Leonard; Lucia C Petito; David H Rehkopf; Lorrene D Ritchie; Barbara Abrams Journal: Child Obes Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Sydney R Aquilina; Martha J Shrubsole; Julia Butt; Maureen Sanderson; David G Schlundt; Mekeila C Cook; Meira Epplein Journal: J Nutr Sci Date: 2021-10-29