Literature DB >> 23784058

Physicochemical and biological quality of soil in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils as affected by chemical and microbial remediation.

Yingping Liao1, Xiaobo Min, Zhihui Yang, Liyuan Chai, Shujuan Zhang, Yangyang Wang.   

Abstract

Chemical and microbial methods are the main remediation technologies for chromium-contaminated soil. These technologies have progressed rapidly in recent years; however, there is still a lack of methods for evaluating the chemical and biological quality of soil after different remediation technologies have been applied. In this paper, microbial remediation with indigenous bacteria and chemical remediation with ferrous sulphate were used for the remediation of soils contaminated with Cr(VI) at two levels (80 and 1,276 mg kg(-1)) through a column leaching experiment. After microbial remediation with indigenous bacteria, the average concentration of water-soluble Cr(VI) in the soils was reduced to less than 5.0 mg kg(-1). Soil quality was evaluated based on 11 soil properties and the fuzzy comprehensive assessment method, including fuzzy mathematics and correlative analysis. The chemical fertility quality index was improved by one grade using microbial remediation with indigenous bacteria, and the biological fertility quality index increased by at least a factor of 6. Chemical remediation with ferrous sulphate, however, resulted in lower levels of available phosphorus, dehydrogenase, catalase and polyphenol oxidase. The result showed that microbial remediation with indigenous bacteria was more effective for remedying Cr(VI)-contaminated soils with high pH value than chemical remediation with ferrous sulphate. In addition, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proven to be a useful tool for monitoring the quality change in chromium-contaminated soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23784058     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1919-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  10 in total

1.  Phosphorus reduction in a shallow hypereutrophic reservoir by in-lake dosage of ferrous iron.

Authors:  Thomas Deppe; Jürgen Benndorf
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  In Situ Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium in Alkaline Soils Enriched with Chromite Ore Processing Residue.

Authors:  Thomas E Higgins; Amy R Halloran; Maribeth E Dobbins; Alex J Pittignano
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Effect of salt on survival and P-solubilization potential of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from salt affected soils.

Authors:  Ramakrishnan Srinivasan; Mahesh S Yandigeri; Sudhanshu Kashyap; Ajjanna R Alagawadi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Leaching and reduction of chromium in soil as affected by soil organic content and plants.

Authors:  M K Banks; A P Schwab; Carlos Henderson
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment.

Authors:  Dimitris Dermatas; Maria Chrysochoou; Deok Hyun Moon; Dennis G Grubb; Mahmoud Wazne; Christos Christodoulatos
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Margaret C Graham; John G Farmer; Peter Anderson; Edward Paterson; Stephen Hillier; David G Lumsdon; Richard J F Bewley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Aerobic chromate reduction by Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  C Garbisu; I Alkorta; M J Llama; J L Serra
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Effects of particle size and acid addition on the remediation of chromite ore processing residue using ferrous sulfate.

Authors:  Santhi Chandra Jagupilla; Deok Hyun Moon; Mahmoud Wazne; Christos Christodoulatos; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.588

9.  Assessment of zerovalent iron for stabilization of chromium, copper, and arsenic in soil.

Authors:  Jurate Kumpiene; Solvita Ore; Giancarlo Renella; Michel Mench; Anders Lagerkvist; Christian Maurice
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Cr (VI) remediation by indigenous bacteria in soils contaminated by chromium-containing slag.

Authors:  Liyuan Chai; Shunhong Huang; Zhihui Yang; Bing Peng; Yan Huang; Yuehui Chen
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 10.588

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Simultaneous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated soils by hybrid bio-nanocomposites of fungal hyphae and nano-hydroxyapatites.

Authors:  Zhihui Yang; Lifen Liang; Weichun Yang; Wei Shi; Yunping Tong; Liyuan Chai; Shikang Gao; Qi Liao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Insights into the role of extracellular polymeric substances in Zn2+ adsorption in different biological sludge systems.

Authors:  Yu-Xia Song; Cheng-Hai Lu; Peng Liu; Xi-Lin Chai; Xi Chen; Xiao-Bo Min; Chong-Jian Tang; Li-Yuan Chai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Production of a microcapsule agent of chromate-reducing Lysinibacillus fusiformis ZC1 and its application in remediation of chromate-spiked soil.

Authors:  Jun Huang; Jingxin Li; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.