Benjamin M Good1, Andrew I Su. 1. Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. bgood@scripps.edu
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Bioinformatics is faced with a variety of problems that require human involvement. Tasks like genome annotation, image analysis, knowledge-base population and protein structure determination all benefit from human input. In some cases, people are needed in vast quantities, whereas in others, we need just a few with rare abilities. Crowdsourcing encompasses an emerging collection of approaches for harnessing such distributed human intelligence. Recently, the bioinformatics community has begun to apply crowdsourcing in a variety of contexts, yet few resources are available that describe how these human-powered systems work and how to use them effectively in scientific domains. RESULTS: Here, we provide a framework for understanding and applying several different types of crowdsourcing. The framework considers two broad classes: systems for solving large-volume 'microtasks' and systems for solving high-difficulty 'megatasks'. Within these classes, we discuss system types, including volunteer labor, games with a purpose, microtask markets and open innovation contests. We illustrate each system type with successful examples in bioinformatics and conclude with a guide for matching problems to crowdsourcing solutions that highlights the positives and negatives of different approaches.
MOTIVATION: Bioinformatics is faced with a variety of problems that require human involvement. Tasks like genome annotation, image analysis, knowledge-base population and protein structure determination all benefit from human input. In some cases, people are needed in vast quantities, whereas in others, we need just a few with rare abilities. Crowdsourcing encompasses an emerging collection of approaches for harnessing such distributed human intelligence. Recently, the bioinformatics community has begun to apply crowdsourcing in a variety of contexts, yet few resources are available that describe how these human-powered systems work and how to use them effectively in scientific domains. RESULTS: Here, we provide a framework for understanding and applying several different types of crowdsourcing. The framework considers two broad classes: systems for solving large-volume 'microtasks' and systems for solving high-difficulty 'megatasks'. Within these classes, we discuss system types, including volunteer labor, games with a purpose, microtask markets and open innovation contests. We illustrate each system type with successful examples in bioinformatics and conclude with a guide for matching problems to crowdsourcing solutions that highlights the positives and negatives of different approaches.
Authors: Allison B McCoy; Adam Wright; Archana Laxmisan; Madelene J Ottosen; Jacob A McCoy; David Butten; Dean F Sittig Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: G Hernández-Chan; A Rodríguez-González; G Alor-Hernández; J M Gómez-Berbís; M A Mayer-Pujadas; R Posada-Gómez Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Karim R Lakhani; Kevin J Boudreau; Po-Ru Loh; Lars Backstrom; Carliss Baldwin; Eric Lonstein; Mike Lydon; Alan MacCormack; Ramy A Arnaout; Eva C Guinan Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Christopher B Eiben; Justin B Siegel; Jacob B Bale; Seth Cooper; Firas Khatib; Betty W Shen; Foldit Players; Barry L Stoddard; Zoran Popovic; David Baker Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Joyce Y Tung; Chuong B Do; David A Hinds; Amy K Kiefer; J Michael Macpherson; Arnab B Chowdry; Uta Francke; Brian T Naughton; Joanna L Mountain; Anne Wojcicki; Nicholas Eriksson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gregory W Gundersen; Matthew R Jones; Andrew D Rouillard; Yan Kou; Caroline D Monteiro; Axel S Feldmann; Kevin S Hu; Avi Ma'ayan Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Kathleen M Jagodnik; Simon Koplev; Sherry L Jenkins; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Benedict Paten; Stephan C Schurer; Michel Dumontier; Ruben Verborgh; Alex Bui; Peipei Ping; Neil J McKenna; Ravi Madduri; Ajay Pillai; Avi Ma'ayan Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 6.317