PURPOSE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to assess the coping styles of female adolescent cancer patients regarding potential loss of fertility. Expectations and desires for the future, coping styles in typical adolescence, and coping styles when faced with potential loss of fertility due to cancer treatment are discussed. METHODS: Female adolescents diagnosed with cancer aged 12-18 years at study (N=14) were administered a 10-item values clarification tool to pilot test the readability and relevance of the items on reproductive concerns, followed by a cognitive debriefing interview asking participants how they would respond to each item. These qualitative responses were assessed for coping style type using the constant comparative approach. RESULTS: All adolescent participants reported having a strong desire for biological children in the future. Reactions to questions regarding the loss of fertility fell into two categories of coping styles: emotion-focused coping or problem-focused (engagement) coping. Within emotion-focused coping, there were three distinct styles: externalizing attribution style, internalizing attribution style, and repressive adaptation. Problem-focused coping adolescents displayed optimism. CONCLUSION: Successful interventions aimed at promoting adaptive coping styles should seek to uncover adolescents' values about future parenthood and reproduction. Development of an age-appropriate assessment to stimulate dialogue regarding fertility and initiate an adolescent's cognitive processing of potential fertility loss is warranted.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to assess the coping styles of female adolescent cancerpatients regarding potential loss of fertility. Expectations and desires for the future, coping styles in typical adolescence, and coping styles when faced with potential loss of fertility due to cancer treatment are discussed. METHODS: Female adolescents diagnosed with cancer aged 12-18 years at study (N=14) were administered a 10-item values clarification tool to pilot test the readability and relevance of the items on reproductive concerns, followed by a cognitive debriefing interview asking participants how they would respond to each item. These qualitative responses were assessed for coping style type using the constant comparative approach. RESULTS: All adolescent participants reported having a strong desire for biological children in the future. Reactions to questions regarding the loss of fertility fell into two categories of coping styles: emotion-focused coping or problem-focused (engagement) coping. Within emotion-focused coping, there were three distinct styles: externalizing attribution style, internalizing attribution style, and repressive adaptation. Problem-focused coping adolescents displayed optimism. CONCLUSION: Successful interventions aimed at promoting adaptive coping styles should seek to uncover adolescents' values about future parenthood and reproduction. Development of an age-appropriate assessment to stimulate dialogue regarding fertility and initiate an adolescent's cognitive processing of potential fertility loss is warranted.
Authors: Peter C Trask; Amber G Paterson; Christine L Trask; Cristina B Bares; JoAnn Birt; Cathy Maan Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Carrie L Nieman; Karen E Kinahan; Susan E Yount; Sarah K Rosenbloom; Kathleen J Yost; Elizabeth A Hahn; Timothy Volpe; Kimberley J Dilley; Laurie Zoloth; Teresa K Woodruff Journal: Cancer Treat Res Date: 2007
Authors: Francesca E Duncan; Mary Ellen Pavone; Alexander H Gunn; Sherif Badawy; Clarisa Gracia; Jill P Ginsberg; Barbara Lockart; Yasmin Gosiengfiao; Teresa K Woodruff Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Molly B Moravek; Leslie C Appiah; Antoinette Anazodo; Karen C Burns; Veronica Gomez-Lobo; Holly R Hoefgen; Olivia Jaworek Frias; Monica M Laronda; Jennifer Levine; Lillian R Meacham; Mary Ellen Pavone; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Erin E Rowell; Andrew C Strine; Teresa K Woodruff; Leena Nahata Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Catherine Benedict; Bridgette Thom; Danielle N Friedman; Elaine Pottenger; Nirupa Raghunathan; Joanne F Kelvin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Irit Ben-Aharon; R Abir; G Perl; J Stein; G Gilad; H Toledano; S Elitzur; G Avrahami; A Ben-Haroush; G Oron; E Freud; D Kravarusic; M Ben-Arush; G Herzel; I Yaniv; S M Stemmer; B Fisch; S Ash Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 4.430