Jermaine D Jones1, Perrine Roux2, Sharon Stancliff3, William Matthews3, Sandra D Comer4. 1. Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: JermaineDJones@gmail.com. 2. Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States; INSERM U912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France; Université Aix Marseille, IRD, UMR-S912, Marseille, France; ORS PACA, Observatoire Régional de la Santé Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France. 3. Harm Reduction Coalition, 22 West 27th Street, New York, NY 10001, United States. 4. Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In an effort to increase effective intervention following opioid overdose, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) has implemented programs where bystanders are given brief education in recognizing the signs of opioid overdose and how to provide intervention, including the use of naloxone. The current study sought to assess the ability of NYSDOH training to increase accurate identification of opioid and non-opioid overdose, and naloxone use among heroin users. METHODS: Eighty-four participants completed a test on overdose knowledge comprised of 16 putative overdose scenarios. Forty-four individuals completed the questionnaire immediately prior to and following standard overdose prevention training. A control group (n=40), who opted out of training, completed the questionnaire just once. RESULTS: Overdose training significantly increased participants' ability to accurately identify opioid overdose (p<0.05), and scenarios where naloxone administration was indicated (p<0.05). Training did not alter recognition of non-opioid overdose or non-overdose situations where naloxone should not be administered. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that overdose prevention training improves participants' knowledge of opioid overdose and naloxone use, but naloxone may be administered in some situations where it is not warranted. Training curriculum could be improved by teaching individuals to recognize symptoms of non-opioid drug over-intoxication.
BACKGROUND: In an effort to increase effective intervention following opioid overdose, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) has implemented programs where bystanders are given brief education in recognizing the signs of opioid overdose and how to provide intervention, including the use of naloxone. The current study sought to assess the ability of NYSDOH training to increase accurate identification of opioid and non-opioid overdose, and naloxone use among heroin users. METHODS: Eighty-four participants completed a test on overdose knowledge comprised of 16 putative overdose scenarios. Forty-four individuals completed the questionnaire immediately prior to and following standard overdose prevention training. A control group (n=40), who opted out of training, completed the questionnaire just once. RESULTS:Overdose training significantly increased participants' ability to accurately identify opioid overdose (p<0.05), and scenarios where naloxone administration was indicated (p<0.05). Training did not alter recognition of non-opioid overdose or non-overdose situations where naloxone should not be administered. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that overdose prevention training improves participants' knowledge of opioid overdose and naloxone use, but naloxone may be administered in some situations where it is not warranted. Training curriculum could be improved by teaching individuals to recognize symptoms of non-opioid drug over-intoxication.
Authors: John Strang; Victoria Manning; Soraya Mayet; David Best; Emily Titherington; Laura Santana; Elizabeth Offor; Claudia Semmler Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Sandra D Comer; Maria A Sullivan; Robert A Whittington; Suzanne K Vosburg; William J Kowalczyk Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-06-20 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Alexander Y Walley; Ziming Xuan; H Holly Hackman; Emily Quinn; Maya Doe-Simkins; Amy Sorensen-Alawad; Sarah Ruiz; Al Ozonoff Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-01-30
Authors: David Frank; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Honoria Guarino; Alex Bennett; Travis Wendel; Lauren Jessell; Anastasia Teper Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2014-07-31
Authors: Joanne Neale; Caral Brown; Aimee N C Campbell; Jermaine D Jones; Verena E Metz; John Strang; Sandra D Comer Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-12-28 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Laura Brandt; Aimee N C Campbell; Jermaine D Jones; Suky Martinez; Joanne Neale; Stephen Parkin; Caral Brown; John Strang; Sandra D Comer Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 3.716