Laura Brandt1, Aimee N C Campbell1, Jermaine D Jones1, Suky Martinez1, Joanne Neale2,3,4, Stephen Parkin2, Caral Brown2, John Strang2,4, Sandra D Comer1. 1. Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 2. National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. 3. Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 4. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Camberwell, London, UK.
Abstract
Background: Our aim was to explore emotional reactions to intervening in an overdose event from the perspective of individuals who use opioids (peer responders). In addition, we were interested in the impact this experience may have on peer responders' feelings about helping in an overdose situation in the future. Methods: For this qualitative sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), data from 61 interviews were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Results: Peer responders had diverse emotional reactions to the overdose event. These ranged from a sense of pride and other positive feelings associated with their ability to help to ambivalence about being involved in situations perceived as challenging and burdensome. There were few reports of the overdose event as an exclusively negative experience. Many peer responders perceived it as their duty to use naloxone again if required. However, some had ambivalent feelings toward this responsibility, which may be related to negative experiences with previous intervention efforts. Conclusions: The capacity of people who use opioids to help reduce the harms associated with opioid overdose is experienced as empowering by some. Nonetheless, engaging peer responders in strategies to reduce opioid-related mortality should be coupled with appropriate resources to process their experiences and emotional responses.
Background: Our aim was to explore emotional reactions to intervening in an overdose event from the perspective of individuals who use opioids (peer responders). In addition, we were interested in the impact this experience may have on peer responders' feelings about helping in an overdose situation in the future. Methods: For this qualitative sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), data from 61 interviews were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Results: Peer responders had diverse emotional reactions to the overdose event. These ranged from a sense of pride and other positive feelings associated with their ability to help to ambivalence about being involved in situations perceived as challenging and burdensome. There were few reports of the overdose event as an exclusively negative experience. Many peer responders perceived it as their duty to use naloxone again if required. However, some had ambivalent feelings toward this responsibility, which may be related to negative experiences with previous intervention efforts. Conclusions: The capacity of people who use opioids to help reduce the harms associated with opioid overdose is experienced as empowering by some. Nonetheless, engaging peer responders in strategies to reduce opioid-related mortality should be coupled with appropriate resources to process their experiences and emotional responses.
Authors: Patricia R Freeman; Emily R Hankosky; Michelle R Lofwall; Jeffery C Talbert Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: John Strang; Victoria Manning; Soraya Mayet; David Best; Emily Titherington; Laura Santana; Elizabeth Offor; Claudia Semmler Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Alexandria Macmadu; Lisa Frueh; Alexandra B Collins; Roxxanne Newman; Nancy P Barnett; Josiah D Rich; Melissa A Clark; Brandon D L Marshall Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2022-07-08