Literature DB >> 23773182

Level 2 perspective taking entails two processes: evidence from PRP experiments.

Markus Janczyk1.   

Abstract

In many situations people need to mentally adopt the (spatial) perspective of other persons, an ability that is referred to as "Level 2 perspective taking." Its underlying processes have been ascribed to mental self-rotation that can be dissociated from mental object-rotation. Recent findings suggest that perspective taking/self-rotation may not require central capacity. By using the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm and the locus-of-slack logic, the present study scrutinized these results, ruled out alternative explanations, and extended the conclusions. In sum, the findings converge on the notion that Level 2 perspective taking entails 2 processes: a first effortless process that handles rotations of 60° or less, and a second capacity-limited process of mental self-rotation proper that is only invoked at higher degrees of required perspective taking. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773182     DOI: 10.1037/a0033336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Michael Dambacher; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-03

3.  Constrained postures and spatial S-R compatibility as measured by the Simon effect.

Authors:  Magali Kreutzfeldt; Marco Leisten; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-08-20

4.  The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Michael Dambacher; Maik Bieleke; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-12

5.  No differences in dual-task costs between forced- and free-choice tasks.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Sophie Nolden; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-20

6.  Perceived Ownership of Avatars Influences Visual Perspective Taking.

Authors:  Christian Böffel; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  No evidence for automatic response activation with target onset in the avatar-compatibility task.

Authors:  C Böffel; J Müsseler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10

8.  Test-Taking Motivation in Education Students: Task Battery Order Affected Within-Test-Taker Effort and Importance.

Authors:  Anett Wolgast; Nico Schmidt; Jochen Ranger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 9.  Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Franziska Plessow
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  Shared action spaces: a basis function framework for social re-calibration of sensorimotor representations supporting joint action.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Pierpaolo Iodice; Stefano Ferraina; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.