Literature DB >> 23773139

Experimental support for a desolvation energy term in governing equations for binding equilibria.

Brian M Castellano1, Daryl K Eggers.   

Abstract

This study introduces a new thermodynamic framework for aqueous reaction equilibria that treats water as a coreactant in the development of a general binding equation. The approach features an explicit consideration for the change in hydration that occurs when two solvated surfaces come into contact. As an outcome of this framework, the standard-state free energy of binding is defined by the summation of two terms: the traditional term (-RT ln Ki) plus a desolvation free-energy term that is weighted by the number of complexes formed at equilibrium. The new formalism suggests that the equilibrium ratio, Ki, is not a constant and that the observed concentration dependence of Ki may be used to obtain the molar desolvation energy and the standard-state free energy at infinite dilution. The governing equation is supported by results from isothermal titration calorimetry using the chelation of calcium(II) by EDTA as a model binding reaction. This work may have far-reaching implications for solution thermodynamics, including an explanation for the oft-noted discrepancy between the enthalpy values obtained by calorimetry and those from the van't Hoff approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773139      PMCID: PMC3754792          DOI: 10.1021/jp402632a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  23 in total

1.  Van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies from isothermal titration calorimetry: are there significant discrepancies?

Authors:  J R Horn; D Russell; E A Lewis; K P Murphy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  The role of backlash in the "first injection anomaly" in isothermal titration calorimetry.

Authors:  Laura S Mizoue; Joel Tellinghuisen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Biophysics: More than a bystander.

Authors:  Philip Ball
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Possible origin of differences between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpy estimates.

Authors:  J B Chaires
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter.

Authors:  T Wiseman; S Williston; J F Brandts; L N Lin
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Significant discrepancies between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies. III.

Authors:  Y Liu; J M Sturtevant
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Significant discrepancies between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies.

Authors:  H Naghibi; A Tamura; J M Sturtevant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Significant discrepancies between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies. II.

Authors:  Y Liu; J M Sturtevant
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Energetics of Ca(2+)-EDTA interactions: calorimetric study.

Authors:  Y V Griko
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1999-06-07       Impact factor: 2.352

10.  Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure.

Authors:  K D Collins
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  3 in total

1.  Accounting for apparent deviations between calorimetric and van't Hoff enthalpies.

Authors:  Samuel A Kantonen; Niel M Henriksen; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.770

2.  Obtaining precise and accurate results by ITC.

Authors:  Lee D Hansen; Colette Quinn
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Estimation of non-constant variance in isothermal titration calorimetry using an ITC measurement model.

Authors:  Xiujie Ge; Lan Chen; Dexing Li; Renxiao Liu; Guanglu Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.