Literature DB >> 23771015

Machine learning-based patient specific prompt-gamma dose monitoring in proton therapy.

P Gueth1, D Dauvergne, N Freud, J M Létang, C Ray, E Testa, D Sarrut.   

Abstract

Online dose monitoring in proton therapy is currently being investigated with prompt-gamma (PG) devices. PG emission was shown to be correlated with dose deposition. This relationship is mostly unknown under real conditions. We propose a machine learning approach based on simulations to create optimized treatment-specific classifiers that detect discrepancies between planned and delivered dose. Simulations were performed with the Monte-Carlo platform Gate/Geant4 for a spot-scanning proton therapy treatment and a PG camera prototype currently under investigation. The method first builds a learning set of perturbed situations corresponding to a range of patient translation. This set is then used to train a combined classifier using distal falloff and registered correlation measures. Classifier performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and maximum associated specificity and sensitivity. A leave-one-out study showed that it is possible to detect discrepancies of 5 mm with specificity and sensitivity of 85% whereas using only distal falloff decreases the sensitivity down to 77% on the same data set. The proposed method could help to evaluate performance and to optimize the design of PG monitoring devices. It is generic: other learning sets of deviations, other measures and other types of classifiers could be studied to potentially reach better performance. At the moment, the main limitation lies in the computation time needed to perform the simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771015     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Developing Predictive or Prognostic Biomarkers for Charged Particle Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael D Story; Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018

2.  Auto-Trending daily quality assurance program for a pencil beam scanning proton system aligned with TG 224.

Authors:  Chengyu Shi; Qing Chen; Francis Yu; Jingqiao Zhang; Minglei Kang; Shikui Tang; Chang Chang; Haibo Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Detecting prompt gamma emission during proton therapy: the effects of detector size and distance from the patient.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Dennis Mackin; Eunsin Lee; Stephen Avery; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paul Maggi; Steve Peterson; Rajesh Panthi; Dennis Mackin; Hao Yang; Zhong He; Sam Beddar; Jerimy Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Compton Camera and Prompt Gamma Ray Timing: Two Methods for In Vivo Range Assessment in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Fernando Hueso-González; Fine Fiedler; Christian Golnik; Thomas Kormoll; Guntram Pausch; Johannes Petzoldt; Katja E Römer; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Hardev S Grewal; Michael S Chacko; Salahuddin Ahmad; Hosang Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.