Literature DB >> 23769660

The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients.

Philip J Hanwright1, Armando A Davila, Elliot M Hirsch, Seema A Khan, Neil A Fine, Karl Y Bilimoria, John Y S Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety of breast reconstruction in obese patients remains to be clearly defined. This study utilized multi-institutional data to characterize the effect of body mass index (BMI) on breast reconstruction outcomes.
METHODS: Utilizing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, patients undergoing tissue expander, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and free flap breast reconstruction were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified as obese (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese (BMI < 30). Overall postoperative morbidity, flap complications, non-flap complications, and reoperation rates were compared among the groups.
RESULTS: Of 12,986 patients who underwent breast reconstruction, 3636 (28.0%) were obese. Overall morbidity was significantly elevated in obese patients across all forms of reconstruction (p < 0.05). BMI was correlated with increased surgical complications for tissue expander, pedicled TRAM, and free flap reconstructions (OR = 1.09, OR = 1.05, OR = 1.10, respectively; p < 0.05). Medical complications were higher in obese patients undergoing tissue expander and pedicled TRAM reconstructions (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in latissimus and free flap reconstruction patients. Compared with obese tissue expander recipients, obese patients reconstructed using autologous tissue had higher rates of reoperations (12.8% versus 9.1%), overall morbidity (18.0% versus 9.5%), surgical (12.7% versus 8.3%), and medical complications (9.0% versus 2.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: The NSQIP database allows for evaluation and comparison of reconstructive outcomes in the obese population. Increased BMI was associated with higher morbidity in autologous reconstruction than tissue expander reconstruction. Among autologous procedures, latissimus flaps experienced the lowest captured 30 day morbidity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Body mass index; Breast reconstruction; Complication; DIEP; Deep inferior epigastric perforator; Flap; Implant; Microvascular; NSQIP; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; Pedicle; TRAM; Tissue expander; Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769660     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  18 in total

1.  Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Be Considered in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Billig; Reshma Jagsi; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edward Buchel; Edwin G Wilkins; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction in the high-risk population: current review of the literature and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Margaret S Roubaud; Joseph N Carey; Emma Vartanian; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Late Surgical-Site Infection in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Indranil Sinha; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins; Jennifer B Hamill; Xiaoxue Chen; Hyungjin M Kim; Gretchen Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Complications Related to Breast Reconstruction Using Different Skin Flaps After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jiahua Xing; Ziqi Jia; Yichi Xu; Muzi Chen; Youbai Chen; Yan Han
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

7.  Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score.

Authors:  John Y S Kim; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Keith M Hume; Christopher J Simmons; Michael J Weiss; Robert X Murphy; Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-06-05

8.  Total Single-Stage Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Free Nipple Grafts.

Authors:  Jean-Claude D Schwartz; Piotr P Skowronski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-01-07

9.  Goldilocks Mastectomy with Bilateral In Situ Nipple Preservation Via Dermal Pedicle.

Authors:  Heather Richardson; Joel A Aronowitz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-20

10.  Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?

Authors:  Christine Velazquez; Robert C Siska; Ivo A Pestana
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.