| Literature DB >> 23766548 |
Justin Hepler1, Dolores Albarracin, Kathleen C McCulloch, Kenji Noguchi.
Abstract
Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i.e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i.e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words "condom" and "sex". The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23766548 PMCID: PMC3678776 DOI: 10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Motiv Emot ISSN: 0146-7239