Literature DB >> 23766067

Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.

Janusz Kaczorowski1, Stephen J C Hearps, Lynne Lohfeld, Ron Goeree, Faith Donald, Ken Burgess, Rolf J Sebaldt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the Provider and Patient Reminders in Ontario: Multi-Strategy Prevention Tools (P-PROMPT) reminder and recall system and pay-for-performance incentives on the delivery rates of cervical and breast cancer screening in primary care practices in Ontario, with or without deployment of nurse practitioners (NPs).
DESIGN: Before-and-after comparisons of the time-appropriate delivery rates of cervical and breast cancer screening using the automated and NP-augmented strategies of the P-PROMPT reminder and recall system.
SETTING: Southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 232 physicians from 24 primary care network or family health network groups across 110 different sites eligible for pay-for-performance incentives.
INTERVENTIONS: The P-PROMPT project combined pay-for-performance incentives with provider and patient reminders and deployment of NPs to enhance the delivery of preventive care services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean delivery rates at the practice level of time-appropriate mammograms and Papanicolaou tests completed within the previous 30 months.
RESULTS: Before-and-after comparisons of time-appropriate delivery rates (< 30 months) of cancer screening showed the rates of Pap tests and mammograms for eligible women significantly increased over a 1-year period by 6.3% (P < .001) and 5.3% (P < .001), respectively. The NP-augmented strategy achieved comparable rate increases to the automated strategy alone in the delivery rates of both services.
CONCLUSION: The use of provider and patient reminders and pay-for-performance incentives resulted in increases in the uptake of Pap tests and mammograms among eligible primary care patients over a 1-year period in family practices in Ontario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23766067      PMCID: PMC3681471     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  21 in total

1.  Views of family physicians in southwestern Ontario on preventive care services and performance incentives.

Authors:  Kelly K Anderson; Rolf J Sebaldt; Lynne Lohfeld; Ken Burgess; Faith C Donald; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 2.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Lessons from evaluations of purchaser pay-for-performance programs: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; Sheila Leatherman; Kim Sutherland
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 4.  The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: an evidence-based prevention resource for nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Tricia Trinite; Carol Loveland-Cherry; Lucy Marion
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2009-06

5.  Pay-for-performance incentives for preventive care: views of family physicians before and after participation in a reminder and recall project (P-PROMPT).

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Orli Goldberg; Verna Mai
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers a systematic review of provider reminders.

Authors:  Roy C Baron; Stephanie Melillo; Barbara K Rimer; Ralph J Coates; Jon Kerner; Nancy Habarta; Sajal Chattopadhyay; Susan A Sabatino; Randy Elder; Kimberly Jackson Leeks
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Patient views on reminder letters for influenza vaccinations in an older primary care patient population: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Kelly K Anderson; Rolf J Sebaldt; Lynne Lohfeld; Tina Karwalajtys; Afisi S Ismaila; Ron Goeree; Faith C Donald; Ken Burgess; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

8.  Acceptability of reminder letters for Papanicolaou tests: a survey of women from 23 Family Health Networks in Ontario.

Authors:  Tina Karwalajtys; Janusz Kaczorowski; Lynne Lohfeld; Stephanie Laryea; Kelly Anderson; Stefanie Roder; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2007-10

9.  Determining use of preventive health care in Ontario: comparison of rates of 3 maneuvers in administrative and survey data.

Authors:  Li Wang; X Nie Jason; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Women's views on reminder letters for screening mammography: Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks.

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Tina Karwalajtys; Lynne Lohfeld; Stephanie Laryea; Kelly Anderson; Stefanie Roder; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

View more
  4 in total

1.  Screening at any cost?

Authors:  Roger Ladouceur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Generalism: the princess and the pea.

Authors:  Martina Kelly; Lara Nixon; Laura Nixon; Wendy Tink
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Jonathan Sicsic; Carine Franc
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-12-22

4.  Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians' perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jason J Ong; Meredith Temple-Smith; Marcus Chen; Sandra Walker; Andrew Grulich; Jennifer Hoy; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.