Literature DB >> 23764767

Spinal coronal profiles and proximal femur bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Rui-Qiang Chen1, Kota Watanabe, Naobumi Hosogane, Tomohiro Hikata, Akio Iwanami, Ken Ishii, Masaya Nakamura, Yoshiaki Toyama, Morio Matsumoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although the occurrence and progression of AIS has been linked to low bone mineral density (BMD), the relationships between spinal curvature and bilateral differences in proximal femur BMD are controversial. Few correlation studies have stratified patients by curve type. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between spinal coronal profile and bilateral differences in proximal femur BMD in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
METHODS: This study included 67 patients with AIS who underwent posterior correction and fusion surgery between January 2009 and October 2011. The mean age at the time of surgery was 17.4 ± 4.1 years. Bilateral proximal femur BMD was measured before surgery by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We compared the proximal femur BMDs by determining the bilateral BMD ratio (left proximal femur BMD divided by that of the right). We evaluated correlations between coronal parameters, obtained from preoperative radiographs, and the BMD ratio using Pearson's correlation analysis.
RESULTS: Patients with Lenke type 1 curve (48; all with a right convex curve) had a mean bilateral proximal femur BMD ratio of 1.00 ± 0.04. Patients with Lenke type 5 curve (19; all with a left convex curve) had a mean bilateral proximal femur BMD ratio of 0.94 ± 0.04, indicating that the BMD in the proximal femur on the right side (concave) was greater than that in the left (convex). Coronal balance was significantly correlated with the BMD ratio in both the Lenke type 1 and type 5 groups, with a correlation coefficient of 0.46 and 0.50, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The bilateral proximal femur BMD ratio was significantly correlated with the coronal balance in AIS patients. When the C7 plumb line was shifted toward one side, the BMD was greater in the contralateral proximal femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23764767      PMCID: PMC3886500          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2872-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Generalized low areal and volumetric bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J C Cheng; L Qin; C S Cheung; A H Sher; K M Lee; S W Ng; X Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  BMD measurement and precision: a comparison of GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA densitometers.

Authors:  Diane Krueger; Nellie Vallarta-Ast; Mary Checovich; Dessa Gemar; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R Mazess; C H Chesnut; M McClung; H Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density in idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up study.

Authors:  K A Thomas; S D Cook; T C Skalley; S V Renshaw; R S Makuch; M Gross; T S Whitecloud; J T Bennett
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Trabecular bone mineral density in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S D Cook; A F Harding; E L Morgan; R J Nicholson; K A Thomas; T S Whitecloud; E S Ratner
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H A King; J H Moe; D S Bradford; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Osteoporosis and acquired back deformities.

Authors:  W L Burner; V M Badger; F C Sherman
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Plantar weight-bearing pattern in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S Hoppenfeld; R A Lopez; G Molnar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Clinical reproducibility of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  P Williams-Russo; J H Healey; T P Szatrowski; R Schneider; S Paget; K Ales; P Schwartzberg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Ronald C Hamdy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  Global malalignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the axial deformity is the main driver.

Authors:  Mohamad Karam; Ismat Ghanem; Claudio Vergari; Nour Khalil; Maria Saadé; Céline Chaaya; Ali Rteil; Elma Ayoub; Eddy Saad; Khalil Kharrat; Wafa Skalli; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Analysis of Proximal Femoral Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Máté Burkus; Ádám T Schlégl; Kristóf József; Ian O'Sullivan; István Márkus; Miklós Tunyogi-Csapó
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.